Skip to comments.Alabama Democratic Party Submits Different Obama Birth Certificate In Ballot Challenge Appeal
Posted on 04/25/2013 11:21:53 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
In a unusual rare move, the Alabama Democratic Party has submitted a amicus brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. The reason being is most likely because the Alabama Supreme Court has Chief Justice Roy Moore presiding over it. He supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin during his court martial. Another worry for them is another justice named Tom Parker. He once opined in a prior McInnish case:
"McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the short form and the long form birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public."
This has reasons for the Alabama Democratic Party to be alarmed. In the amicus brief, the Alabama Democratic Party attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence submitted by McInnish inadmissible and not worthy of belief and stated:
"A county sheriff from Arizona is not an official source of anything in Alabama."
One thing that stands out in the amicus brief filed, specifically on page 33 is something new. It's a Barack Obama long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something not seen before. It's not the normal security paper backing that the Hawaii Dept. Of Health has been using. It is raising a lot of questions that even has Obama supporters baffled. Click on the link and scroll to page 33 of the brief to see the birth certificate.
He was elected. He was reelected. At this point, it doesn’t matter if he was born on Mars. What do these people think is going to happen. If they couldn’t find any proof in the last 6 years, what are the chances they could now? If the Clintons’ couldn’t find anything, what makes you think rank amateurs could?
It annoys him.
It appears to load in layers with the “safety paper” background loading last.
Altho in Black&White, it looks no different than what I’ve seen before.
Here is also the Alabama Secretary Of State Beth Chapman’s amicus brief against the plaintiffs.
Maybe the craopla meter has finally gotten high enough that even some Democrats have started to figure it out.
Raised seal and everything? /s
“If the Clintons couldnt find anything, what makes you think rank amateurs could?”
The Clintons know. How do you think Hillary ended up Sec of State? On her qualifications?
The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Cold Case Posse are not amateurs Nick. They have found proof that Obama’s long form birth certificate and selective service registration has been forged.
If Hillary had any proof, you don’t she would have pulled the trigger early in the primary?
They may be great at law enforcement, but at digging up dirt on people, they are amateurs compared to the Clintons.
He could rule the Country from a jail cell just fine as long as he promises to keep giving stuff away to all the leechs.
Those documents being forged do not prove he was born outside the U.S. There are many possible reasons for that. If the President was born somewhere else, shouldn't all these people searching for it, found some tangible proof by now? It's hard for me to imagine they wouldn't have by now.
First, there is no dispute that Presient Obama's birth was publicly announced in the local Honolulu newspaper in 1961.
No, it appeared on the questionable microfilm roll that magically disappeared.
I think the Clinton’s know everything about 0bama, but just like the rest of this country, are afraid to do anything that may actually get rid of this cancer.
Of course proof of that has been found, along with a phony Social Security number. But it doesn't matter a whit unless the gonads are found to press forward with impeachment and removal of the UIC (Usurper in Chief).
Is it legal for a presidential candidate to present false documentation of his/her eligibility to run for and hold the office of POTUS?
At some point Justice Moore will receive an offer he really can’t refuse. The case will suddenly end with a peremptory dismissal and harsh words from the judge for the plaintiffs.
Mutually Assured Destruction. The Chicago Mob had plenty on the Clintons too.
It all depends on whose threats of physical and financial harm were more credible.
“Those documents being forged do not prove he was born outside the U.S.”
The documents being forged do not prove he was born ‘inside’ the U.S. either.
There is such a person BTW, anxiously awaiting an early Spring vacation in Arizona ~ none of that summer time stuff!
Her popularity with their base.
“Is it legal for a presidential candidate to present false documentation of his/her eligibility to run for and hold the office of POTUS?”
Some Democrats in my circles are beginning to say things to distance Obama from the fraudulent long form document. The White House will play it out as long as possible and find someone to take the blame.
At this point, they can legally stall the clock until 2016.
Once they’re gone, it will all be revealed.
That looks like a moiré pattern which safety paper was designed to produce when copied. It does that so one can distinguish a copy from the original.
The 100% fact is people who spent 2012 talking about Obama's birth certificate, were HELPING Obama. They were distracting from the story of the economy etc. under Obama. The latter is what could have kicked him out of office.
My question to you, is would you rather pursue and be right about your pet theory, and Obama have MORE power, or would you rather defeat Obama's agenda, but have to let him "get away" with certain things? It seems like a lot of people are in the former camp, which I think is crazy.
Nothing can destroy the Clintons.
“If Hillary had any proof, you dont she would have pulled the trigger early in the primary?”
She couldn’t afford to do it for fear of the media labeling her a racist and for fear of losing the black vote. She was in a catch-22 situation.
Don’t think it is a question of what the Clinton’s had on Obama. It is a question of what Obama had on the Clntons.
So “people who spent 2012 talking about Obama’s birth certificate” distracted you “from the story of the economy etc, under Obama.”
I hope your day job doesn’t require multitasking.
“The 100% fact is people who spent 2012 talking about Obama’s birth certificate, were HELPING Obama. They were distracting from the story of the economy etc. under Obama. The latter is what could have kicked him out of office.”
Romney went to the public and hammered Obama on the terrible economy under his belt and Obama still won.
It didn’t distract me, but it did a lot of people. Actions are louder than words, why would these people even say anything until they had their smoking gun.
Mutually Assured Destruction. The Clintoons have a long trail to keep covered.
LOL. What were you watching? Romney pulled every punch there was. I think Romney actually said Obama was doing a good job a few times. (Which McCain did the time before)
Maybe it just makes the rest of us "little people" (also known as the mass unwashed to some) to know that:
(1) we were lied to for 9+ years by the President and
(2) we were lied to for 9+ years by the Democrat Party and
(3) we were lied to for 9+ years by the main-stream media and
(4) follow me on this one, we were right all along.
And if the rest of the country doesn't care that they all lied then the country is certainly doomed. Call me old fashioned like that.
To paraphrase Mulder: The Proof is out there.
The person who signed this is guilty of perjury. They said that Onaka twice verified that the image on the White House website is a “true and correct copy” of the original paper record on file at the HDOH.
That is what Onaka was twice asked to verify AND WOULDN’T. IOW, he verified the exact opposite: to Bennett he verified that it is NOT a “true and correct representation of the original record on file, and to Kobach he verified that the information contained in the White House image is NOT “identical to” the information contained in the original record on file.
Furthermore, the chair of the Alabama Democratic Party (Mark Kenneday) was informed of what Onaka’s letter of verification to Ken Bennett really meant, by Larry Klayman on or around Sept 10, 2012 (The signer of the certified mail receipt, Teresa Smiley, didn’t put a “date received” on it).
“Her popularity with their base”
Maybe. If so, that right there shows, as well as anything, what is so wrong with this administration. You have the face of the nation in the Sec of State. Dealing with, how many nations? Very complex, things always changing. Thousands of people, all who think they are very important. Day to day crisis around the world. Etc.
And so, you hire Hillary Clinton? Hell, if I lived outside the US, I’d probably be bombing us too...I’M JOKING.
What a load of BS. The posse showed other pieces of mail from that exact post office, and Obama’s was the ONLY ONE that had a date stamp like that.
We know with certainty it is not a scan of an official document as is claimed. That means this document is a forgery and fraud, both felonies.
Only a fool would fall for this obvious fake.
So who was distracted?
Who was so bamboozled by this matter in 2012 that they didn’t the economy was in a death spiral?
Are you suggesting if everyone had just kept Obama’s forged documents a secret, then Romney would’ve won?
I'm a conservative, to me actions speak louder than words. So far, birthers have done a lot of talking, but they haven't done any damage to Obama. So for me, they are all hat no cattle. Anyone who does that much talking with 0 results, loses a lot of respect with me. So, until they actually have results they should shut up, or face ridicule.
I don't know what you do for a living, but can you just get by on cheap talk and promises, and never deliver? Because I can't? Maybe you are a therapist or a social worker, and it's all about yammering, and tears, and feelings. But I'm not going to apologize for being a conservative and results oriented. Life is not like the "no winner," "no keeping track of goals," soccer game like the ones you take your kids to.