Posted on 05/16/2013 1:25:21 AM PDT by LibWhacker
I agree. Let them live according to their customs in their land and let us have our culture here. Unfortunately the elites who govern us do not share this point of view.
I’ve lived in a mid size southern city for most of the last 40 years. When I arrived here to take my first job the county population was about 68% white, 30% black and 2% all other. Today the county is 58% white/non Hispanic, 12% Hispanic, 2% Asian, 27% Black, 1% other.
It was rare to see a Hispanic person before the mid 1990’s. Now the Hispanic community, primarily Mexican and Central American, is well established, fast growing and very visible. Over the last 3-4 years I’ve observed a rapid increase in the number of Muslims in the area. In my small community of 32 homes we have 2 houses occupied by Muslims. It is no long rare to see women wearing hijabs at restaurants, shopping centers, and other public places. A mosque and islamic center have been constructed in the past 5 years. The local county library is putting on Islamic themed programs, paid for by grants from the federal government, with the alleged purpose of promoting better understanding. Over the past year the local news media has suddenly become filled with stories about alleged discrimination against Islamic residents, demands for the school system to accommodate the special needs of Muslim children (i.e. more Muslim cultural and historical teaching), or the general intolerance of Christians for Muslims.
Where are these people coming from? What is their source of income? Why are they choosing to settle in the heartland? One of my Islamic neighbors, who has a large and very nice home, owns an oriental rug shop. However there are never any cars at his place of business and I do not know anyone who has purchased anything at his shop.
Just as there was a flood of immigration into this country from Mexico and Central America in the 1990’s and 2000’s it appears we are experiencing a flood of Muslim immigrants in this decade. Based on their behavior they have no intention of assimilating and their presence is encouraged by our government and institutions.
So our troops who go to muslim countries are to blame for what happens to them?
Our embassy workers are to blame?
So how long have you supported sharia?
But remember, the UAE is presented as ‘moderate’ and in fact, is touted to turn a ‘blind eye’ to the partying done by Christians. IMO, it’s like the spider and the fly.
>>>So our troops who go to muslim countries are to blame for what happens to them?
Our embassy workers are to blame?
So how long have you supported sharia?<<<
You are certainly trolling me turning everything upside down.
Why are you dragging troops and embassy into it?
What makes me a Sharia supporter?
You are claiming it just to make me look bad.
IMHO, Sharia is among the worst and most subhuman set of social rules ever and I made my position clear since the very beginning. That is exactly why I find a woman who willingly puts her into a Sharia environment as the one asking for worst trouble.
Are you the one who blame guns or tall buildings for suicides and claim suicidal maniacs a victims?
It is a pretty fair comparison following your own logic.
>>>But remember, the UAE is presented as ‘moderate’ and in fact, is touted to turn a ‘blind eye’ to the partying done by Christians. IMO, it’s like the spider and the fly.<<<
UAE is only pretends to be ‘moderate’ bacause it is good for business. Prada shoes and Benz won’t change a savage who lives by the same laws as their less advanced friends elsewhere.
Everyone who expects any civilized behavior from them, especially woman, is just plain naive or simply stupid.
Some of those countries have the appearance of being civilized, but they are really just savage subhumans with savagery written into law.
I’m disappointed with Australia on this... The basic facts should have brought on the wrath of the Australian government, not hiding behind diplomatic procedure.
This reminds me of a story that got a lot of play on talk radio a few years ago. It involved an American woman who was married to a Muslim from Saudi Arabia, and she was involved in a major legal/diplomatic battle after her husband left her, took their children, and moved back to Saudi Arabia.
Sean Hannity had her on his radio show as a guest, to explain her plight and tell his listeners the steps she was taking with the help of her Congressman to get the kids back. When he opened the phone lines to the callers, I couldn't believe what I was hearing. There wasn't a single caller who would sympathize with here. The typical response from a caller was some variation of the following: "What the hell did you get married to a Muslim from Saudi Arabia for in the first place, lady?"
LOL.
Something about this story seems kind of strange. She was working for Starwood and was allegedly drugged — by three of her co-workers — in the employee lounge of the hotel where she worked. Why wasn’t Starwood involved in any of the legal aftermath of this?
>>Starwood<<
Any civil dispute involving a crime like that has to be based on some ruling about a crime itself. Australian authorities has no criminal jurisdiction on UAE case so she has to bring UAE decision which is most likely says she was drank and had an orgy with three guys (wasn’t raped). She can sue Starwood from Australia if there is a branch but what are her chance?
Which part are you disagree with? All of the above is about dangers of Islam and stupidity of it’s sympathizers or other useful idiots who thinks it’s not hurt or funny.
Expecting savages to act like anything other than a savage defies logic.
I disagree with your assessment that the rape is somehow the woman’s fault. You need to keep in mind that not everyone reads FreeRepublic and not everyone is enlightened enough to recognize that the world is not the Kumbaya place the liberal indoctrination plan advertises.
Expecting savages to act like anything other than a savage defies logic.
_______________________
Exactly.
“Why wasn’t Starwood involved in any of the legal aftermath of this?”
I think that is her point. Starwood put her there and then apparently abandoned her when this occurred. Those decisions were probably made by local managers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.