Posted on 08/18/2013 9:37:05 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
The fine print of Obamacare says “The 4th Amendment be damned, we’re coming into your house when we feel like it.” There is no other way to interpret what the allowable government raids of otherwise law abiding American homes will be.
Under the provisions of the healthcare law given to Barack Obama by the Democrats and Chief Justice John Roberts, government thugs will have the right to kick in doors and search homes in a number of circumstances.
These are by no means situations that would cause the average low information voter to shrug and acknowledge that “Maybe that’s not a bad idea,” either.
If some jerk in a government office hundreds, even thousands of miles away, decides your household is “at high risk,” he or she can green light Obama’s Gestapo troopers to...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Claymores in the shrubbery on each side of the porch would be an appropriate response.
GraceG:" It’s not like they actually believe in the constitution and always bitch about the constitution being a charter of “negative liberties”.... "
Why , the next thing they will demand to be quartered in our homes ; and we will be required to offer them food and drink ,
Didn't we fight a war over certain injustices an imperialistic leader imposed on citizens a while ago ?
Right .. thats just what I feel about ROBERTS RAIDS .." so warm and fuzzy all over..."
Roberts - he approved it ! .. He OWNS IT!
and Roberts is concerned about his legacy ? /s Private propterty ..is now passe !
Personal privacy ...is now passe !
See the "Purpose" paragraph:
You have overlooked the paragraph in the Obamacare law that says that participation by families is “voluntary.”
And, the visits will be conducted by states and non-government entities, not by the FedGov, although FedGov is supply grant money to support the programs.
It’s a bad idea and states should refuse to participate, but it’s not as bad as has been made out in the original article.
My earlier post on this topic has a link to the relevant Obamacare law.
You have overlooked the paragraph in the Obamacare law that says that participation by families is “voluntary.”
And, the visits will be conducted by states and non-government entities, not by the FedGov, although FedGov is supply grant money to support the programs.
It’s a bad idea and states should refuse to participate, but it’s not as bad as has been made out in the original article.
My earlier post on this topic has a link to the relevant Obamacare law.
Thank you. Unless somebody posts evidence to the contrary, I will assume, contrary to the article, that these criteria don’t even justify search with warrant, much less without one.
You know, conservatives do themselves no good when they hyperventilate over such easily disproven injustices. Boy Who Cried Wolf and all that.
There are more than enough legitimate intrusion on our liberties to protest instead of making phony ones up.
Are you truly not aware of how the ‘game’ is played with child services?
So, a ‘voluntary’ inspection team shows up at your house at 6:30pm one evening. S’ok though, it’s voluntary, you can refuse. And you do.
So, next morning at 6am child services (the real government agency) is there with sheriff’s deputies with a warrant. Based on an ‘anonymous’ tip. What do you do then? Remember, your kids are there and they’ll probably take them no matter what. For observation and study. They can’t be too safe in these cases so your kids will be in foster care until you prove your worthiness in parenting...
Yeah, it’s voluntary. ‘Voluntary’. LOL.
It’s voluntary in the same way OSHA inspections are voluntary. You have the right to refuse entry, in which case they will return with a warrant and a bad attitude.
However, as I understand this law, what is voluntary is signing up. There does not appear to be any mechanism to add people to the list without their requesting it.
Yeah. I’m suspicious of that too. It’s like the seatbelt laws that were ‘voluntary’ and you’d only get written up IF you were stopped for something else.
That lasted exactly 5 years in my homestate.
I don’t give this ‘voluntary’ inspection even that long. It’s way too tempting to use it to persecute political enemies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.