Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sodomy-based marriage "legalized" in all 50 states by a bureaucratic tyrant
Renew America ^ | September 21, 2013 | Bryan Fischer

Posted on 09/21/2013 7:35:00 AM PDT by WXRGina

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last
To: AKinAK

“Eventually, their procreation abilities will come up short and there will be fewer and fewer with the “innate desire toward homosexuality.”

That’s the thing, you see: there is no “innate desire.” Homosexuality in males propagates by traumatizing as many pre-adults as possible, in the knowledge that some of the victims will develop SSAD as a result.

Male homosexuality will propagate for as long as any homosexual has access to pre-adults. Or until God says otherwise.

“My sister was raped at 14 and went lesbian.”

A trauma in the pre-adult years. The etiology seems to be a little different for women.

“Love her just the same.”

Of course. I would point out, though, that SSAD is treatable. Just because she “went,” doesn’t mean she can’t come back.


61 posted on 09/23/2013 7:59:02 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ConstantSkeptic

“But so far both the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Labor have said that they will follow the Supreme Court’s ruling.”

They are in the executive branch. People who care more about themselves than the country, or God, or liberty will carry out the wishes of the vile demon who wallows in the White Hut.


62 posted on 09/23/2013 8:02:02 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fwdude; All
The prop 8 case was remanded back to a lower court for lack of standing, ...

I think that the decision of pro-gay activist justices to send the Prop. 8 case back to the lower court was unconstitutional. More specifically, the Constitution's Clause 2 of Section 2 of Article III says that the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases where a state is a party.

In fact, I know of two amendments to the Constitution, the 11th and 19th Amendments, that were ratified in response to the Supreme Court's decision in cases where individuals sued a state.

And it so happens that one of the cases, Minor v. Happersett, is very applicable to the Prop. 8 case imo. This is because the Supreme Court clarified in Minor that sex was not a constitutionally protected voting rights criterion regardless of the 14th Amendment's equal protections clause, activists pushing to legalize gay marriage with PC interpretations of that clause.

63 posted on 09/23/2013 9:58:23 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson