Posted on 10/21/2013 6:16:30 AM PDT by alexmark
excellent! rebel!
I think the problem is deeper than 7,000,000 enrollees. In order to be successful in reducing premiums—or merely to keep premiums within their current range in the private market, the enrollees can’t be an ‘adverse selection’ of applicants.
Adverse selection occurs when the only enrollees are those who have expensive prior ailments or those who don’t have to pay because they are poor.
Obamacare has to have millions of young, healthy invincibles’ who will pay premiums but won’t produce a lot of claims in order to work. If you get 7,000,000 people with either a continuing disease/illness or free coverage, then you have only burdened the system further with enrollees whose coverage will cost more than they pay for it.
Young folks who opt to pay the $95 penalty instead of paying monthly premiums won’t help the system at all.
This is fantastic! Is it possible to collect enough money to put this on a billboard somewhere? Would a company allow it? This ought to be plastered everywhere.
I wish they would be too, but most sheeple wouldn’t even get it.
My guess they'll charge you out the azz for it.
“My guess they’ll charge you out the azz for it. “
They have it price limited by some formulae. But, even if they do, it will only be until whatever problem is fixed. (Assuming they don’t go British Health Ministry on my *ss.)
You don't know much about human nature, I'm thinking. Sounds logical, but it won't happen. Most of us that have medical issues requiring periodic medical attention didn't get there by way of lifestyle.
Unfortunately you are right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.