Posted on 01/28/2014 9:27:20 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
From the widely feared global freeze alarmists from academia and media touted in the 1970’s to the global warming fear-mongering of the 21st Century by the same suspects, man’s responsibility for the earth’s climatic condition has been the subject of consternation and debate.
For those of us who believe in God and the wisdom passed down to us in the Bible, the first command of God to humankind made in His image and likeness is: “Be fertile and multiply, fill the earth and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air and all the living things that crawl on the earth.” Genesis 1:28
Given that command from our Creator, it is apparent that man is responsible for the condition and maintenance of the things of earth. If we are to have dominion over all...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
0
1
global warming is the biggest lie ever told. this is the coldest year ever :Snow in new Orleans , snow in Pensacola, snow in Egypt this year. factories have been emitting C02 for the past 200 years. This CO2 is what democrats say is trapping heat in the atmosphere causing global warming. if that were true then sea levels would have risen 60 feet in those 200 years. They haven’t .there is MORE ice than ever in Antarctica( google it) not less. It’s hasn’t warmed. there is no sea level rise, ice caps have not melted.global warming is a big lie democrats push to grow government and control us (socialism).
democrats are pure evil
democrats are pure evil
I will always continue to fight for freedom and for smaller, almost nonexistent just constitutional government: I am a Republican
There’s gold in them thar clouds, son. Money to be made and domination to be achieved.
Congress knows it
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/109/s517/text
Wall Street knows it
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/optioninvestor/05/052505.asp
Some writers and readers know it
http://www.newswithviews.com/Peterson/rosalind8.htm
Taxpayers? Not so much
the mission of the EPA cannot be one exclusively limited to restriction of actions at all costs; it must also be supportive of actions to mitigate, as opposed to merely opposing, some action that might require mitigation of its affects while remaining an action it is good and right that we permit
many kinds of “environmental” damage are things we can help nature accomodate or adjust for and where needed recover from, without terminal harm to the entire biosphere
nature and the natural world (LIFE writ large) are extremely adaptive and resilient, and even within the actions of nature itself there are species losses and species gains, as befits LIFE’s adaptation AND survival to change
as befits our own nature we are capable of being responsible for our actions and their impact on the environment BUT that responsibility MUST be mixed with
all the other responsibilities we have to ourselves and each other
that means WE CAN make responsible compromises and still SUFFICIENTLY protect our environment
Don’t tell me global warming is false.
It was 248 Kelvin here this morning.
Was that in the sun or in the shade? It really does make a difference! :)
yes and idiot democrat sheep believe in the global warming hoax
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.