Posted on 02/05/2014 10:57:21 AM PST by butterdezillion
This gives perspective on the casket images for the casket at Loretta Fuddy's funeral, showing how the body matches the casket's dimensions, using a casket's standard length as the basis to set the scale and then setting Fuddy's photo and the casket image to scale.
Fuddy would barely have fit into that casket, and only with her arms squished in above her body. Her hands would have had to be up on her chest to be clasped as they were, and the image of the hands cannot be Fuddy in this casket. If they had intended to show Fuddy's body they would have used an oversized casket. The lid of this casket shows it is not an oversized casket.
I need to find out what happened. Microsoft Word changed an image that was 20x31 to 25x26 when I rotated it. Twice, this evening when I was checking out what a poster at my blog had said and trying to figure out what went wrong. My methodology was fine; it’s just that Word butchered the image. sigh.
I’d still like to find out how Fuddy’s body would line up in the casket. But how do you do that when the images are on the computer and your computer butchers images when they’re rotated? What else is Word going to butcher? It’s a fantastic technique to try to discredit somebody because they don’t expect sabotage. Or maybe it’s just a glitch and this has been going on for the past 25 years and it just never made a difference to anybody until now - like the Xerox glitch that was suddenly noticed when it was thought it might explain Obama’s BC anomalies...
Microsoft Word changed a 20x31 image to 25x26 when I rotated it. Somebody on my blog told me to do the analysis on the full image and I had to keep the image vertical in order to get it on the page. Without the rotation the image was not butchered so I was able to get the right proportions which then reversed my conclusion on Fuddy fitting in the casket.
Now I have to find out why Microsoft Word butchered the images.
Over the years, I've followed much of the work you and many others have done, leading me to believe that the thing being hidden was the likely adoption by Soetoro. (if you can forgive the possible over-simplification, as to the complexities)
Fuddy may have fudged the records -- I don't know. She would likely been the one. But be careful. You could crawl onto limbs that may not support, thus discredit that investigative work you've been a part of previously.
The Founding Fathers built a system based on their knowledge of human nature - that absolute power corrupts absolutely. The way to curb corruption is through scrutiny and accountability. The same thing holds true to keep honest mistakes in check as well. That’s why I show my work/documentation and think out loud a lot on my blog or here. If I lay it all out there and nobody is able to find my error and correct me then when the error IS made known I’m no less credible than all the others who couldn’t figure out what was wrong. All I’ve ever asked of any of my adversaries is that they give me reasons that make sense. “You’re just insane and need to get help” doesn’t make sense out of any of the evidence. Sadly, the typical no-brainer Obot response is also alive and well here at FR among folks who claim to not be that. It’s ugly.
If my computer is being messed with again, it’s not a discredit to me. It’s exposure of the desperation of the people who have those capabilities. I have no fear of the truth. None. If I’ve made a mistake I want to know it and don’t care if anybody else knows it too.
And because that’s the way I operate and because the evidence stands or falls in its own right regardless of anything that happens with me, they’re not going to embarrass or “discredit” me into silence.
And with that, I’ll just go on and say this: I don’t see how that image of Fuddy in the casket or of the casket that the mourners were looking at during the “visitation” can show the same casket as was at the funeral according to the Diocese’s photo. The end side by where the head goes doesn’t go straight across on the Diocese photo, like it does in those other images. I’ve been trying to figure out how the hinge works and why there’s that elbow in the shape of that end piece. I don’t know exactly how it works, but I know that when the casket lid was open that shape was there, and those other images show an open lid but no elbow in the shape. So it doesn’t seem like those can be the same caskets.
Now if somebody comes up with an explanation that makes sense, I’ll change my mind. But if somebody wants to call me stupid or discredit me for thinking as I do, then they better come up with the explanation, because if they can’t give an explanation then they’re just as messed up as I am, only they don’t have the integrity to try to sort it all out until they get answers that make sense. And that’s much, much worse than simply being mistaken in the course of wrestling with the evidence.
So far the “explanations” for the photoshopped image (of the casket showing hands crossed inside) have been to deny that the visible evidence even exists. That doesn’t work. Answers have to be real and true, not a denial of what actually exists.
Exactly.. grasping for anything at it’s worse.
Reminds me of the time I did a facial recognition comparison of Obama in two photos and discovered a three mole cluster .05” below his right ear lobe in the first photo. In the other the cluster was gone so it was obviously a body double. The Cold Posse took my report but within 6 months informed me that my method was flawed. They did a side by side comparison and noted Photo One was of the right ear, Photo Two was of the left ear.
Sorry delusional rant....
Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls.
It's true, I rarely worry.
If you ever void it will sound like a BOMB!
I fart in your general direction.
The smell of fear is in everything you write
That's your upper lip you're smelling.
that is why you try so desperately to smear those telling the truth
What with mocking those who make up fantasies, I haven't the time.
If it didn’t bother you, you would go off somewhere and do something useful.
Jeering at the unbalanced may not be useful, but it gets me my ya-yas.
Everything and everyone will be exposed!
So.. you run a TSA scanner?
You cannot escape judgment.
Clearly.
“Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls.”
With your permission, I may have finally found a tag line.
Use Gimp to process your images.
It is free. And is an excellent photo editor. It is available in Windows and Linux formats.
There are other good image viewing programs if you want something lighter and quicker. If interested I will look up the options for you. I have used a couple of them.
If you do mass image manipulation there is a great command line tool called Image Magic. A super fast powerful program.
See post 83. I told you your proportions were in error.
Word is not meant for image manipulation.
Clumsy tradecraft kills your credibility.
Junior may be an engineering whiz, but he ain't gonna prove it using mud and sticks.
Luckily for Rooster, he is a continual state of Redux (due to the Lord's diligence).
Irrepressibly light-hearted for the official FR blogophobe.;-)
;-{)
Butter’s blog is the exception to your rules. It is well worth following because she is a relentless detective. I would put her up against Miss Marple or Poirot any day.
It was one of the best comments I’ve ever seen. I never aspired to a tagline before, but now I’ve got one.
Thanks.
Btw, where did those strange capital ‘A’s come from?
It's a conspiracy.
They obviously would not fit into a standard tagline.
The Bilderbergers and the Illuminati put them there using photoshop.
Your tired lines got stale long ago.
Hi, lj! It’s nice to see you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.