Bradley Heard
The first 2 lines: Is it true that someone is taking the side of allowing ONLY noncitizens to register to vote? I am confused.
We have lost our Country. Time for revolution!
If it looks like treason, walks like treason, and sounds like treason, there’s a fairly good chance it’s treason.
Considering the things which have already come to pass when Holder’s DOJ backs it up, I won’t take this one lightly.
WHAT ???
It sounds like Mrs. Heard’s little Bradley should be in prison for advocating for voter fraud. I know that everyone in the world would have liked to vote for “the child of the Earth” and his follow up buffoon, Slick Willie’s wife but this is BS.
These are the days that were predicted where truth would be counted as a lie and a lie would be counted for the truth.
Prince George’s Urbanist... Sounds like we should bomb his blog with a little FRee advice?
When we get to a Con Con, we need to add an amendment that states only US citizens are allowed to vote and that children born to illegal aliens in the US are NOT granted automatic citizenship.
Hey, why NOT let foreigners vote? Convicted Felons, too! Illegal Aliens? No problemo!
I think that DOJ should fix it where everybody and anybody can vote 2, 3, 4 or 6 times!
At the same time, make it ILLEGAL for White Men and Women, especially Veterans, Active duty and those who attended a TEA Party rally to be able to vote.
That should fix it, right?
Why are these jokers bother going to some Commission? Stop the non citizens from voting and tell FedGov to jump in a lake. Force Obama to send the military to Kansas to ensure all the illegal aliens can get to vote.
The original article said:
"Justice Department lawyer Bradley Heard was in court today trying to stop Kansas from ensuring that only citizens register to vote. Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, relying on a United States Supreme Court opinion of last year, asked the federal Election Assistance Commission to permit him to ensure that only citizens were registering to vote.
Why was it changed and by whom?
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-e8hoAeaKJQk/T0j3dgOHqmI/AAAAAAAAA08/Hn1xzWQeRxM/s220-h/Brad_May2011.jpg
Introduction: I’m an attorney and citizen activist who resides in the Capitol Heights area of Prince George’s County, Maryland. I grew up in Virginia Beach, Virginia, and spent most of my adult life in Atlanta, Georgia, before moving to Prince George’s County in 2007. Twitter: @BradleyHeard
Bradley Heard
A federal judge had some tough questions for us in this important #NVRA #votingrights case brought by #KS & #AZ. tinyurl.com/l5jqwgl
https://mobile.twitter.com/BradleyHeard
First, note that the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, Clause 2 of Article VI, means that only those federal laws which are reasonably based on the limited powers which the states have expressly delegated to Congress via the Constitution take precedence over state laws.
And with respect to constitutonally delegated power for the feds to regulate voting, the states have granted Congress the specific powers only to protect such privileges on the basis of race, sex, tax status, and age as evidenced by the 15th, 19th, 24th and 26th Amendments respectively.
Regarding the so-called right for non-citizens to vote, the Supreme Court clarified in Minor v. Happersett that citizenship does not automatically confer the right to vote.
However, the problem with state officials fighting federal power grabs, such as with this voting rights issue, is the following. I'd be willing to bet money, because I'd probably win most of the time, that state officials, including state lawmakers, are low-information citizens who don't know how to argue issues like this voting rights issue.
Finally, remember that the reason that DC policy-makers have been using the Supremacy Clause to successfully usurp state powers is the following imo. Federal bureaucrats have been taking advantage of the fact that multitudes of low-information voters don't understand that the feds don't have the constitutional authority to do most of the things that they are doing these days. This is because generations of parents have not been making sure that their children are being taught the federal government's constitutinally limited powers, particularly the 18 clause of Section 8 of Article I, as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood.
In fact, Judge Andrew Napolitano will read Section 8 to you in three minutes.
Judge Napolitano & the Constitution
D***! They are so determined to destroy the US ASAP. The “man of lawlessness” indeed.
Not only politicans, lawyers need “rope” as well, got rope?
Illegals, criminals, rapists - dems want them all to have a vote: