Cardinal Dolan says "Bravo!" (to Gay Football Player Michael Sam)

Rorate Caeli ^

[ClaytonP]

"Who am I to judge?" makes a triumphant entry in the American subset of the College of Cardinals, in an interview granted to the highest-rated political debate program on US television, to be broadcast tomorrow:

Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York praised University of Missouri football star Michael Sam for coming out as gay, saying he would not judge the athlete for his sexual orientation. "Good for him," Dolan said in an interview with NBC's "Meet the Press" airing Sunday.

"I would have no sense of judgment on him," Dolan continued. "God bless ya. I don't think, look, the same Bible that tells us, that teaches us well about the virtues of chastity and the virtue of fidelity and marriage also tells us not to judge people. So I would say, 'Bravo.'" [Source]

OK, then. Naturally, the Cardinal did not have to say anything at all regarding a specific individual, even if asked. But silence and discretion are one thing, explicitly refusing moral discernment is another, and raising such refusal to the status of "good" and "bravo" is quite noteworthy for a Prince of the Church, because it is in itself a moral judgment, a positive moral judgment.

It is quite easy to see that no moral debate in which the Catholic Church takes part, of any kind and on any level, can ever anymore advance even one inch if the parameters become simply an isolated reading of "not judging" - and much less if "not judging" is elevated to the positive judgment of "good" and "bravo." Politicians quote a pontiff when casting immoral votes, and what can the Church say, from now on, on any legal matter (that presupposes a moral order)? It can always be used to stop any social debate. What can poor pastors and vicars say regarding any sin, even personally to a parishioner, when the isolated presentation of "no sense of judgment" becomes normative? Or even regarding, for instance, an inclination that our judgmental Catechism of the Catholic Church defines as "objectively disordered" (regardless of the practice or not of the "intrinsically disordered" acts attached to it)?

And if you do not like this post, who are you to judge us?...

[Op-ed update: Cardinal Dolan, in this age, it is keeping the faith that deserves a "Bravo".] 

[Heart-Rest]

EWTN is currently running video programs with Cardinal Dolan for Lent.    Catholics may want to consider contacting EWTN (website "http://www.ewtn.com/"), and strongly urging them to remove those video programs from their lineup.

[fwdude]

My “gadar” pegs into the red whenever I see a picture of Dolan.

[redleghunter]

This Cardinal is doing no favors for Catholics.

[ourworldawry]

The same bible also tells us that homosexuals are going to be destroyed by God Himself.

This is not ABOUT liking or not liking the post, hence passing “judgement”. Our Lord compels us to discern the spirits, to ‘test’ these things to see whether they are from God, or if they are of the Devil. If we do not acknowledge sin when we see it, then there is nothing stopping God from destroying us either, as He will judge us as an accessory to evil. Doesn’t matter who you are.

Then again, why we continue to be surprised by the Catholic church is beyond me, as history has allowed us to be enlightened by it’s atrocities and rebellion against God’s Laws.

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.” Isaiah 5:20

“He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the LORD”. Proverbs 17:15.