Posted on 04/07/2014 5:18:44 AM PDT by servo1969
One of the things Ive tried to drill into my children is the truism that the single biggest indicator of poverty is single motherhood. That data, incidentally, does not reflect the old-fashioned kind of single motherhood, which was the result of widowhood or abandonment. Instead, were talking about modern single motherhood, the kind that sees women who are deluged with birth control choices nevertheless get pregnant with boyfriends or hook-ups who feel no emotional connection or sense of economic obligation to either mother or baby.
One of my children has a part-time job at a cafe and is, for the first time, meeting adults who have full-time jobs but who arent middle-class professionals living in single family homes in solidly upper middle class neighborhoods. One of these adults is pregnant and is unhappy about the fact that the cafe, where shes been working for only five months, will not give her maternity leave.
Inquiry revealed that the pregnant woman is not married; that shes living with a boyfriend who may or may not be the father of her child (my kid doesnt know), and that the boyfriend doesnt work. Except for getting regular nooky at night (assuming that the pregnant woman still wants that kind of attention), the mother-to-be will be, for all practical purposes, a single mother.
My child found it concerning that the boss wont pay this single mother not to work for him. My child was therefore stymied when I asked this question: Why should he pay for her foolish choices?
I noted that, while its entirely possible that this woman was using enough birth control to protect six woman, and nevertheless still managed to get pregnant, the greater likelihood was that she was careless. Indeed, if she really wanted to protect against single motherhood, she could have abstained from sex until she had a ring on her finger and some economic prospects.
I threw in the fact that its incredibly costly to do business in California, especially in the food service industry, which have extremely low profit margins. Employers generally are drowning in regulations, which makes businesses very expensive to run. Add in taxes and all the other costs of business (rent, insurance, salaries, benefits, supplies, etc.), and its guaranteed that the employer is clearing just enough money for his personal expenses (mortgage, insurance, food, etc.). This owner is almost certainly not living extravagantly but is, instead, living a very temperate life.
Much of the money that the federal and state government are taking away from this man, both from his business and from him personally, is going to welfare programs for single mothers, something this employer must know. Since hes already paying for the welfare this young woman will inevitably end up using, why should he pay twice by carrying her on the books even though shes contributing nothing to his business? Even if he was feeling charitable, the government has left him nothing with which to be charitable, not to mention the fact that the government, by snatching money from his pockets, has already decided on his behalf which charities he should support including economically foolish single motherhood.
Such a simple question: Why should he pay for her foolish choices, when the government is already taxing him heavily in advance to pay for all the foolish choices of intentionally single mothers across America?
I believe ‘daddy’ would be whomever is looking at the logo.
So, ‘Hi, Daddy!’
Not even slightly similar. If I know the consequences of an action and go ahead and do it anyway, that is willful disregard. If I don't know the consequences that is ignorance.
Ignorance by definition is "lack of knowledge" Most of these people don't lack the knowledge of the consequences of their actions, they just don't care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.