Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/09/2014 4:55:12 AM PDT by RealityAlwaysWins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RealityAlwaysWins

” SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED “


2 posted on 07/09/2014 5:04:52 AM PDT by Lionheartusa1 (-: 0bamanomics is the equal distribution of misery :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

This would be a clear violation of the Heller decision.


3 posted on 07/09/2014 5:13:15 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is the well-armed lamb contesting the vote. – Benjamin Franklin


4 posted on 07/09/2014 5:14:54 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

CCW permits in CA are discretionary, but you don’t need a license to own a gun. Long guns and handguns do require registration. All firearms must be sold thru a dealer. CA is looking at permits to buy ammo.


6 posted on 07/09/2014 5:18:19 AM PDT by umgud (I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins
"What in bleeping Hell are you people doing?"


7 posted on 07/09/2014 5:18:36 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins
With the 9th Circuit ruling in Peruta v. San Diego saying that the state must allow either concealed carry or open carry and the 7th circuit ruling in Moore V. Madigan that forced Illinois to adopt shall issue concealed carry, vs. the 3rd Circuit ruling in Drake v. Filko where "justifiable need" was upheld, the entire issue is eventually going to wind up in the Supreme Court.

Let the Massachusetts legislature pass this law which will also be challenged all the way to the Supremes.

8 posted on 07/09/2014 5:23:01 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

Our founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.


10 posted on 07/09/2014 5:35:42 AM PDT by Virginian3127
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins
Bad as this is it isn't anything that the massholes don't deserve.
13 posted on 07/09/2014 5:50:43 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

Whomever votes for this should be shot. This is what the second amendment is for.


14 posted on 07/09/2014 5:53:19 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

Constitutions Supremacy Clause and Bill of Rights trump state laws.


17 posted on 07/09/2014 6:41:55 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

I don’t want to break it to you, but this has been the case for years.

The local police chief “May” issue. It varies town to town. In the cities, you face a tougher battle. My town generally does not issue conceal carry, but I can own handguns.

I don’t agree with the “May” issue part of it. But that’s the way it is.


18 posted on 07/09/2014 6:48:18 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

Hard to believe that the laws in MASS used to REQUIRE people to carry guns while on a journey and to church. But that was back in the day when you could be murdered real fast.

OH WAIT! The only difference is that back then the murderers would also scalp you!


20 posted on 07/09/2014 7:10:19 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need more than seven rounds, Much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

In New Jersey carry permits are based upon your “proving a need” to carry. Unless you are “connected” the proof is never sufficient. What do they fail to comprehend about “shall not be infringed”?


22 posted on 07/09/2014 7:21:22 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

SCOTUS shot down (no pun intended) a very similar law just a couple of years ago.


27 posted on 07/09/2014 5:40:08 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RealityAlwaysWins

The issuance of either Class A or Class B LTC is ALREADY totally discretionary.

It’s the FID card - which you need for a BB gun, or mace, as well as any (not banned) long gun - that is now “shall issue”, this law would put the FID card under the same regime as the LTC.

By the way, I have a non-resident Class A LTC and the people at the Firearms Records Bureau have been nothing but pleasant and helpful to deal with.


28 posted on 07/09/2014 5:45:30 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson