Posted on 07/30/2014 10:07:03 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Two published studies coming from locations as diverse as Montana and Duke University have reinforced conservatives’ intuitive understanding that socialists and Democrats–being members of a Party dedicated to socialism–are likely to be cheaters.
With its disdain for rules, honesty and ethics, socialism finds a home in the Democrat Party. Many of its most prominent members are regularly elected and re-elected by voter fraud and have been tried and convicted of serious crimes.
It is not uncommon for those who have worked in political campaigns at any level of government to experience some form of Democrat cheating. It will start with pulling down opponents’ signs (a favorite Democrat sport engaged in after a night of drinking) and continue on to voter intimidation, illegal voting and cheating in the final vote count.
In collaboration with The University of Munich, Duke University has released a study quantifying what has been part of the socialist/Democrat nexus for the past 200 years. The Duke study showed that the more saturated with socialism an individual is, the more likely that person is to cheat. The connection to the Democrat Party is blindingly obvious; they are socialists therefore they are cheaters.
Halfway across the county from Duke University, a companion to the “Democrats-are-socialists-and-therefore-cheaters” story has surfaced.
In Montana, John Walsh, the Democrat candidate for U.S. Senate who is the incumbent by appointment, has been exposed by the New York Times as having plagiarized...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
So what’s the surprise? These people say there is no such thing as absolute morality or truth. If one thinks that, then there is absolutely no reason not to lie or cheat. Never, ever trust somebody who says there is no absolute truth and everything is relative.
Bttt
Play simple poker or board games with these schmucks.
It’s the only way they can win and usually I get bored and feign some other interest.
I hate playing with people who don’t play Hoyle.
Believe me, I’ve been listening to a certain amount of drivel this week.
It’s all relative, justified and equivalence.
Walsh is a liar and a cheater and a thief. Obviously, his character has been on display before he went to The War College. How could anyone in the Montana National Guard have promoted this liar and cheater and thief? It must have been people just like Walsh.
THIS Coach is right also;)
Email received today - don’t know the date, or if it has already been posted - even if so, it’s worth reposting.
Did not know Lou Holtz was so articulate. Absolutely powerful, insightful and truthful.
Subject: Two Americas - Lou Holtz Nails it
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas . The America that works, and the America that doesn’t. The America that contributes, and the America that doesn’t. It’s not the haves and the have not’s, it’s the dos and the don’ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don’t. That’s the divide in America . It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility. It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country.
That’s not invective, that’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it. The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.” He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he say that’s not just. That is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote Democrat. That is the philosophy that produced Detroit . It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America . It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal.
The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victim-hood and anger instead of ability and hope. The president’ premise –that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful –seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices. Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.
You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college – and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course; you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course. Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take. My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an in equality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine. Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth? No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure. The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and short sighted decisions.
Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort. The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get.” Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.
He and his party speak of two Americas , and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization. What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That’s what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow. Two Americas , coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln ’s maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand. “Life is ten percent what happens to you and ninety percent how you respond to it.”
Lou Holtz
Leo “Lou” Holtz (born January 6, 1937) is a retired American football coach, and active sportscaster, author, and motivational speaker.
Today, Walsh is begging people to look at his entire record. That means that he’s admitting to being a liar and a cheater and a thief.
What about all the people who didn’t lie and cheat and steal? This throws a pall over the entire War College.
And Walsh has proven himself to not be very bright. Does the Governor of Montana have any standards at all? Any?
A democrat and a republican playing a chess game:
The democrat would win most matches.
Not because the democrat is smarter, but because he would know how to cheat, and get away with it. And the republican would be left wondering how it was possible for the democrat to win when he (the republican), was much smarter. Problem for the republican was that, he had more scruples and didn’t want to raise a stink about the cheating.
I wonder what Al Frankin thinks of this??
Or obama? No one gets more then 100% of the vote but obama did in many counties.
TruthOrFiction.Com contacted Bob Lonsberry and he confirmed that he is the author of “Two Americas”, a commentary which he published on his website on December 9, 2013.
No matter who wrote it, its good.
What’s the use of being a leftist if you can’t lie, cheat, and steal?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.