Posted on 09/17/2014 6:48:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The movement descends into litigation. We can either go and beat him up or we can go to court.
WASHINGTON Activists who organized the dormant Occupy Wall Street movement are suing another activist for control of the main Twitter account, and one of the plaintiffs says there was no other option but to turn to litigation to solve the dispute.
The conflict centers around @OccupyWallStNYC, one of the main Twitter feeds that distributed information during the movements heyday in 2011. The OWS Media Group filed a lawsuit against organizer Justin Wedes on Wednesday, which is also the third anniversary of the beginning of Occupy Wall Street. The group, led by activist Marisa Holmes, is seeking control of the Twitter account as well as $500,000 in damages.
The Twitter account, which used to be shared among several activists, is now under the control of Wedes, who explained his decision to take over the Twitter feed in a blog post in August:
A thread about self-promotion became just another shaming session. If we start from a place of assuming bad intentions i.e. discouraging self-promotion over encouraging solid, relevant content we will end up with rules that shame rather than empower. Group members took on the task of limiting others to 1 to 2 tweets per day (or week) on a topic, a form of censorship that would never have been allowed in the earlier days of the boat. I had to say enough!
We can either go and beat him up or we can go to court, Holmes, a video editor who was part of the core organizing team of Occupy, told BuzzFeed News. And quite frankly if we go and beat him up then we could end up with countersuits against us, and that puts us in a more damaging position and we dont really want to do that anyway.
So this is actually the least harmful for ourselves and him given the fact that he wont give up the account without any kind of punitive measure, Holmes said.
Holmes said that there had been numerous attempts to get control of the Twitter feed from Wedes, and that suing him was a last resort.
Ive given him many many chances and so have a lot of other people, she said. For the last six weeks there have been conversations online, mainly on Facebook and through intermediaries.
There has been conversation about it and Justin knew he was going to get sued.
She accused him of using the feed for his own projects, especially his activism surrounding water rights in Detroit.
His taking control of the account is equivalent to someone running off with a bunch of money or selling off assets, she said.
This is the second time in the past year that there have been major fights over control of Occupys still-extant social media accounts, though the movement has for all intents and purposes died. Activists clashed in February over the @OccupyWallSt Twitter account, which was wrested away from other activists by Google engineer Justine Tunney, who claimed to have founded the account.
Wedes did not return requests for comment.
Down twinkles and a frowny face
I doubt they realize that the only winners from litigation are the ONE PERCENT, the lawyers...or, more likely, they never cared in the first place.
“occupy” HAD to go under, because their main protest, Wall St. is the only piece of the economy doing well, and it just wouldnt do to protest the one bright spot in this obammunism.
Just like almost all other protest outfits, they are only interested in protesting IF it hurts Republicans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.