Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attkisson: The Inside Story of How CBS Sat on a Crucial Piece of Benghazi and Protected Obama
TheBlaze Books ^ | 2014-11-05 | Benjamin Weingarten

Posted on 11/05/2014 6:57:27 AM PST by fredericbastiat1

What if there was a crucial piece of information with potentially election-altering implications that a leading media organization sat on until the final weekend before a presidential election — information contradicting the storyline advanced by the president and parroted ad nauseam by that very same media organization for several weeks?

Emmy Award winning journalist and former CBS News correspondent and anchor Sharyl Attkisson describes just this scenario in her new book, ”Stonewalled: My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama’s Washington.”

In an episode that would “irreparably destroy any confidence in and respect…I [Attkisson] might have had for those at the network who were involved,” Attkisson explains that CBS News made an explicit effort to corroborate the Obama administration narrative that the president had referred to Benghazi as an “act of terror” on Sept. 12, 2012, while sitting on evidence from their own interview with the president on that date confirming that he would not refer to Benghazi as a terrorist attack.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: attkisson; benghazi; benghazicoverup; bias; mediabias; msm; obama; romney

1 posted on 11/05/2014 6:57:27 AM PST by fredericbastiat1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fredericbastiat1

I’ve seen nothing to indicate otherwise. øbola ran off and hid.


2 posted on 11/05/2014 7:02:25 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fredericbastiat1

The old media is our enemy. The new media busted their monopoly, but the old media needs to be exterminated. They are the enemy of freedom, the friend of the Marxist tyrant, the arm of the demrat propaganda machine. What more can by said about the old media tyrants?


3 posted on 11/05/2014 7:03:37 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fredericbastiat1

Millions sat out the election because they were disenchanted with Romney. I doubt this would’ve changed anything.


4 posted on 11/05/2014 7:05:39 AM PST by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Millions sat out the election because they were disenchanted with Romney.

During the debates, it was Romney's job to press Obama on Benghazi. Heck, Romney could have even asked Obama for a simple explanation as to why he (Obama) won't release his college records.

5 posted on 11/05/2014 7:11:06 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fredericbastiat1

Bump


6 posted on 11/05/2014 7:14:19 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fredericbastiat1

"Hello, Sheryl! We have some committee chairpersons who would just LOVE to have you come in and tell your story! Are you available, say, the first week of January?"


7 posted on 11/05/2014 7:35:28 AM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Millions sat out the election because they were disenchanted with Romney.

Yes, and look what they wrought: scandal after scandal. No way Romney could have been as bad as Obama. Almost anyone would have been better. Any of the Republican candidates surely would have been better. Now, Obama has done so much damage it may not be possible to fix it.


8 posted on 11/05/2014 7:38:40 AM PST by NotTallTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NotTallTex

My point was the Benghazi story on whether it was or wasn’t terrorism wouldn’t have changed their minds. If they sat on information as to what the ambassador’s true mission was, that may have been different.


9 posted on 11/05/2014 7:42:12 AM PST by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fredericbastiat1
This brings up a most interesting question:

Government executives, legislators and judges can be impeached, and if convicted, removed from their office.

Most professions have formal means to act against individuals who violate the sacred standards of their profession.

But NOT JOURNALISTS!

There is no way to impeach and/or remove or de-certify a "Journalist" for even the most heinous, treasonous, or corrupt behavior.

They are the ONLY group who are unchecked and they run roughshod over our Constitution.

Any suggestions to remedy this?

10 posted on 11/05/2014 7:52:58 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim ("Your apathy is their power." - Sarah Palin Jul 19, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fredericbastiat1

The American Press are just paid Democrat liars.


11 posted on 11/05/2014 8:32:15 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fredericbastiat1

Here is my personal views on the MSM and Emperor Obama.

Obama was and is the creation of the MSM. Without their active and early support Obama would never have advanced beyond the second or third 2008 Presidential primary.

As Obama’s father, in the figurative sense, the MSM has and will continue to do everything within its considerable power for Obama to succeed regardless of its legalities. No parent wants their child to fail.

IMHO when viewed from the parent-child perspective the actions of the MSM for the last several years. When applied tot eh Democratic party you can change years to decades.


12 posted on 11/05/2014 8:33:39 AM PST by Nip (BOHEICA and TANSTAAFL - both seem very appropriate today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

The truth about Benghazi would be very negative for Hillary, so expect the media to do its best to ignore the story. The first votes in the 2016 race are just 14 months away.


13 posted on 11/05/2014 9:09:58 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

“Any suggestions to remedy this?”

Buy the media; fire the leftards; hire decent people.


14 posted on 11/06/2014 11:05:45 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NotTallTex

At least Congress could e counted on to oppose a GOP POTUS if they were majority Democrat. At least a media could be counted on to criticize a GOP POTUS where they would give Obama a free pass.


15 posted on 11/08/2014 7:29:25 AM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nip

No they don’t . Never letting your child mess up spoils the kid. Never letting your child make mistakes, or not being honest to them about when they messed up, makes them less able to solve problems. The media is the equivalent of an incompetent helicopter parent.


16 posted on 11/08/2014 7:32:13 AM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson