DEATH OF FEMINISM

Coach is Right ^ | 11/23/14 | Suzanne Eovaldi

[Oldpuppymax]

When TIME magazine recently banned the word Feminism because of its overuse, a deluge of libfems pounded the editor so roundly that he/she took down the word from the no go list. This is the topic of the great blog piece by Kevin Jackson, an astute observer-writer of the American cultural scene. (1) “A lot of us just don’t want to be associated with a supposed movement that has no unifying theme except being ANTI-MAN!” says one commenter. The libfems may finally be getting the notion that being anti-man represents the basic discomfort rabid feminists have with their own personhood. In short, that it is an inability to succeed on their own merits without reliance on being a victim.

Whining like little children, feminists gained nationwide attention to such an extent they were eventually provided Women’s History classes in academic syllabuses. These offerings so devolved into idiocy that course titles now are laughable. Sexual intercourse was re-named PIV by one libfem professor who surely must have been struggling to fill up class time with something other than silly discussions about anatomy being destiny!

When a movement’s timing has come and gone, its end stages do just that, devolve. When those libfems got their way in the workplace, they put on their high heels and strode off to do a man’s job for which many were very unprepared. The nuanced atmosphere of high stake negotiations devolved into 15″ discussions of one’s female feelings, another’s lateness, another’s total absence “because my car wouldn’t start.” These unspoken clues about total inadequacy transmitted to bosses, opponents, challengers for positions. Part of being employable used to be getting the job done in spite of recalcitrant cars, an overnight snow storm, or a headache that resulted because of whatever.

When the feminists started stuffing those spike...

[hinckley buzzard]

To a very real extent, this is true. "equity feminism," the movement for equal treatment under the law, has basically completed its program and has been successful. The residue of hate known as "movement feminism," has not flourished so well, but its operatives are more determined than ever to --do what-- tear down the family and the community, replacing these levels of society with police state authoritarianism. These are the totalitarians in pant suits who are a true enemy of the people.

[matt04]

Femanists are some if the most miserable people Ingave ever met. The demand equal treatment, but when assigned tasks they don’t like, immideatley demand a man do that job for them.

[Slyfox]