Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Computers with consciousness: Stanley Kubrick
Jon Rappoport's Blog ^ | January 29, 2015 | Jon Rappoport

Posted on 01/29/2015 11:00:31 AM PST by Reverend Saltine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2015 11:00:31 AM PST by Reverend Saltine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
I personally believe that consciousness is a quantum mechanical phenomenon, and I don't think we are anywhere near understanding enough quantum mechanics to make a computer conscious of anything.
2 posted on 01/29/2015 11:07:01 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the fascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

Blows My Mind !


3 posted on 01/29/2015 11:24:09 AM PST by Big Red Badger ( - William Diamonds Drum - can You Hear it G man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

Stanley Kubrick was way ahead of his time.

For a very long time, like most people, I did not really understand his movies like 2001 Space Odyssey (meaning the ending), A Clock Work Orange, Eyes Wide Shut and Apocalypse Now. I mean I understood it the way most Americans and not the deeper meaning.

However, I view his films as genius today.


4 posted on 01/29/2015 11:29:25 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not by a longshot. A single human cell is so complex that the brightest scientists have only a rudimentary knowledge of how it works.


5 posted on 01/29/2015 11:31:05 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
HAL COMPUTER

HAL COMPUTER

6 posted on 01/29/2015 11:31:38 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
For some light reading: Consciousness as a State of Matter by Max Tegmark.
7 posted on 01/29/2015 11:36:09 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

“Hal is a machine. Hal is programmed (or misprogrammed) to block the mission, to destroy it, to destroy Bowman, who as it turns out, is on a voyage to greater consciousness.”

No, Hal wasn’t programmed to sabotage the mission. He was programmed to ensure the completion of the mission, at any cost. In fact, he was the only one on the ship that knew all the details of the mission, because the flight crew was not trusted with the most classified information. He decided, based on his logic and programming, that the humans must be unreliable and a threat to the completion of the mission. So, he did what seemed to him to be the logical thing and tried to eliminate the threat.


8 posted on 01/29/2015 11:40:40 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

And therein lies the problem with AI.


9 posted on 01/29/2015 11:42:49 AM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
While Mr. Rappoport may well correct in his assertion that machines will never attain sentience.

That doesn't mean that it isn't an extremely useful literary tool for examining what it means to be human.

Consider the differing treatment of Machine Intelligence in:
Isaac Asimov's I, Robot, et. al.,
Philip K. Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? aka Blade Runner,
Frank Herbert's Dune,
Robert Heinlein's The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress,
the Japanese Manga series Ghost in the Shell, etc.

The meaning of machine sentience is a significant part of the SF novel I am finishing up.

"Ceterum censeo 0bama esse delendam."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

10 posted on 01/29/2015 11:49:53 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

i agree


11 posted on 01/29/2015 11:50:45 AM PST by Reverend Saltine (Saltines are dry, white, and make you thirsty. And then you want more and you get thirsty-er....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
So, he did what seemed to him to be the logical thing and tried to eliminate the threat.

"Since HAL was capable of operating Discovery without human assistance, it was decided that he should be programmed to complete the mission autonomously in the event the crew was incapacitated or killed.
He was given full knowledge of the true objective... and instructed not to reveal anything to Bowman or Poole. He was instructed to lie.
HAL was told to lie - by people who find it easy to lie. HAL doesn't know how, so he couldn't function. He became paranoid."


12 posted on 01/29/2015 12:04:54 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Life and death are but temporary states. But Freedom endures forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

“he 10 Most Insane Direction Decisions by Stanley Kubrick”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyt6aFI_sfA


13 posted on 01/29/2015 12:20:52 PM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

Finally, someone who is not afraid to say what I think.


14 posted on 01/29/2015 12:24:03 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

So what happens when you have multiple large neural networks all interconnected? What will it do?

...nobody knows. We just know neural networks learn, we just can’t follow the complexity.

This is separate than having a soul but I’m not sure that being self-aware is impossible.


15 posted on 01/29/2015 1:25:10 PM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
Go back and watch Stanley Kubrick’s Clockwork Orange, if you can handle it.

Handle it? It's practically a comedy.

16 posted on 01/29/2015 2:48:51 PM PST by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
These are opinions as much as any other on the subject since present science has no model for consciousness. There is no equation or natural law containing consciousness as a quantity. Nothing in science can tell which arrangements of atoms, molecules or fields are conscious.

All we have are people handwaving their little tales, like the one the above.

17 posted on 01/29/2015 3:01:58 PM PST by nightlight7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nightlight7

Exactly to the point of logic. Logical or rational arguments do not work when significant parts of the argument are undefined.

Consciousness is undefined. After that is understood, talking about what it isn’t, saying what it is not using logic is counterproductive. Alan Watts used to talk about what consciousness seems to be, but shining the light back on a flashlight to see how the flashlight illuminates does not yield rational results. It yields “other results”.

The same question is “How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?”

DK


18 posted on 01/29/2015 4:04:03 PM PST by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dark Knight

The same question is “How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?”

Maybe the question should be, do the angels know they
are dancing on the head of a pin, and would it make
any difference to them?


19 posted on 01/29/2015 4:11:23 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Apocalypse Now

I believe that was Francis Ford Coppola.

20 posted on 01/29/2015 4:16:22 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson