"But major party candidates for president don't often venture there." "It's pretty rare for a presidential candidate to support the right of the people to revolt against the government."
Susie doesn't know that it was Ted Cruz who won Heller? LOL
"But major party candidates for president don't often venture there." "It's pretty rare for a presidential candidate to support the right of the people to revolt against the government."
Susie doesn't know that it was Ted Cruz who won Heller? LOL
>> you think you and your buddies are going to play Red Dawn against the full might of the U.S. government?
Of course not, Susie. We’ll be going full asymmetrical. For example, leftie journos and other tyranny enablers may want to take a different route to work each day... just sayin’.
The website is called “Crooks and Liars.”
Which is Susie Madrak? A crook or a liar? Or, more likely, both?
The thing that always irks me about their "government can do no wrong" types is their sheer naivete. Do they seriously believe that the United States military works for a bunch of communist-loving, America-hating, fag-embracing, godless pukes? And that all the lefties have to do is snap their fingers and the troops are going to bomb, shoot, and blast their fellow citizens -- most of whom believe as they do -- into oblivion?
When the war comes, we won't be fighting the military. YOU will.
I guess he disapproves of the quote “Live free or die” too.
I can see the author put a GREAT DEAL OF THOUGHT into this statement. Here is Aleksander Soyzinetsian for the rebuttal.
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat.”
Not true.
The person with no conscience is the person who would support unleashing the full power and might of the United States military against the People.
Ask Russia how well the "full might of the.. government" went against the Muslim guerrillas, with far less-accurate weaponry than is deployed afield BY THE MILLIONS during any given deer season in any US state.
To answer your question, you panty-wetting nitwit, we don't have to. Just OWNING weaponry scares the hell out of the US government, and lily-livered state-worshippers like you.
The more I read the emotional rantings of sexually deprived, morally bankrupt, and just plain ignorant women the more I question their right to VOTE!
There appears to be more and more emotionally challenged women spouting off about their own ignorance everyday.
Susie Madrak - Another pinko scumbag for the to-do list...
No article that opens with “The thing that always irks me...” can ever, under any circumstances, be worth reading.
I don’t know who you are, sweetie. Therefore, knowing what does and does not *irk* you is of absolutely no value or consequence.
“The ultimate authority … resides in the people alone. [T]he advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation … forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any.” —James Madison (1788)This quote was included in today's Patriot Post email.
Ted answered the hand-wringing liberals on this. He simply deferred to what the founding fathers thought about an armed populace and government tyranny.
Also, the federal government is prohibited by law from using the military against civilians by the Posse Comitatus Act. The National Guard is your neighbors and your friends. They aren’t going to take up arms for the government. The local police want to go home at night to their families.
Must be little Susie was no where near the “hood” in Baltimore on Monday? Most likely hidden behind some H.O.A. gated commune, guarded by “well armed” security.
>>The thing that always irks me about their “water the tree of liberty” types is their sheer stupidity. Seriously, you think you and your buddies are going to play Red Dawn against the full might of the U.S. government? Where do you suppose all that defense budget money went, folks?
The citizens outnumber the military + law enforcement by about 100 to 1 (and that assumes that everyone in uniform fights for the gummint, which is unlikely).
Most of the defense budget can’t really be used to put down insurrection because the gummint doesn’t want to destroy the infrastructure. (They need a functional economy during and after the rebellion to pay those troops.)
Those people who “play Red Dawn” can do pretty well. Just look at every guerrilla war that we’ve ever fought in.
Cruz is rocking it!
“The thing that always irks me about their “water the tree of liberty” types is their sheer stupidity. Seriously, you think you and your buddies are going to play Red Dawn against the full might of the U.S. government?”
The thing that irks me about pants-wetting government worshipers is that they seem to conveniently forget how much difficulty the U.S. military has had fighting unconventional forces over the last century. Do they really think that only Vietnamese farmers and Iraqi truck drivers are able to successfully conduct a guerrilla war on their home turf?