Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Do "won't support Trump" "conservatives" want Hillary naming Supreme Court justices?

Posted on 02/22/2016 11:24:38 AM PST by WilliamIII

Seems like we're hearing from "conservative" pundits who vow never to vote for Trump.

You'd think Scalia's passing would make them less rash. We can't be totally sure who Donald would nominate - but we KNOW Hillary's judges will be "feel the Bern" types!


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: yes; yesofcoursetheydo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

1 posted on 02/22/2016 11:24:38 AM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

The Uniparty at work.

Hillary is part of the Uniparty.

Trump is the threat to the status quo. He must be stopped at all costs. Fox is in full anti Trump / pimp Rubio mode.


2 posted on 02/22/2016 11:25:40 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII; Admin Moderator

Vanities should be labeled as such.


3 posted on 02/22/2016 11:26:55 AM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Poll internals suggest it is Trump at work.


4 posted on 02/22/2016 11:27:01 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Do “support Trump” pseudo-conservatives want Hillary appointing Supreme Court justices? Because you’d think all of the polls showing Hillary beating Trump handily would make them less rash...


5 posted on 02/22/2016 11:28:13 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Trump is exposing many within the republican party for who they really are. We’ve seen several people, including Erik Erikson proudly proclaim that he won’t vote for Trump under any circumstances. Lindsey Graham has said the same, and I’m betting the Bushes won’t vote for him either. These people would much rather see Hillary win, and also see the country swirl down the 3rd World drain, than risk seeing the gop establishment defeated.


6 posted on 02/22/2016 11:28:49 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Obviously yes


7 posted on 02/22/2016 11:30:48 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I do not want any Dem appointing any Justice, and will accordingly vote for any Republican, even Trump.


8 posted on 02/22/2016 11:31:21 AM PST by theoilpainter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Probably. The “No candidate is good enough for me” types have gotten us two ASSociate justices so far...


9 posted on 02/22/2016 11:31:27 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

There are simply not enough Uniparty pundits to make a different. If low voter turnout is a factor, it is because of voters.


10 posted on 02/22/2016 11:32:14 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I love how it was a big deal that, in the beginning, Trump was harangued for not stating he wouldn’t run 3rd party and forced by the establishment to say he would support the eventual nominee. Now pissant, so-called “Conservatives” are backing out of the deal. Chickensh!t4, every one. I hope they get what they deserve.


11 posted on 02/22/2016 11:33:23 AM PST by dware (Everybody wants to be a patriot, until it's time to do patriot stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

There are conservative pundits that would vote for a third term for Obama before they would vote for Trump...


12 posted on 02/22/2016 11:36:14 AM PST by usmcobra (Happiness is a belt fed weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dware

Why would anyone believe Trump’s nominees to the Supreme Court would be anymore conservative than Hillary Clinton’s nominees?

Trump historically has been a liberal Democrat. There is no reason to think once he has played the GOP for the suckers that sadly a lot of you seem to be that he want govern far to the left.


13 posted on 02/22/2016 11:36:30 AM PST by brandon craig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

They do. They want to have him loose.


14 posted on 02/22/2016 11:39:06 AM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brandon craig

“why believe Trump’s nominees to the Supreme Court would be anymore conservative than Hillary Clinton’s nominees?”

The two people he named in the recent debate are both Republican judges with conservative records. How many people with the same background has Hillary mentioned?


15 posted on 02/22/2016 11:39:12 AM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Because of Trumps dirty dealings with the mafia, he'll have no choice but to nominate Laretta Lynch. If it weren't for her looking the other way, they'd all be in prison.
The mafia boys will make sure trump puts her on the bench - or else he'll find more than a hourses head in his bed in the morning..

In 2013, former federal judge Paul Cassell testified before the House Judiciary Committee, and encouraged them to look at how Lynchs office had handled a stock fraud case. That case involved Felix Sater, a convicted fraudster with ties to the mafia (and senior adviser to Donald Trump.). Senator Orrin Hatch (Senate Judiciary Committee) asked Lynch to respond to Cassells testimony. He also asked whether Lynch had complied with federal laws that ensure restitution is provided to crime victims.

She has Trump by the boys.

(Thank u Dana!)

16 posted on 02/22/2016 11:40:25 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

They do. They want to have him loose.”

Yes I know they want him to lose, even in the general election. But by definition, that means turning the Supreme Court over to Hillary. How can a genuine “conservative” be OK with that?


17 posted on 02/22/2016 11:41:13 AM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

But there is no evidence that Trump won’t say one thing today and do something different tomorrow.

The man has no history of espousing constitutional or conservative principles so who knows what kind of nominee he would give us once in office.


18 posted on 02/22/2016 11:41:54 AM PST by brandon craig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

No we don’t. We also don’t want Trump to pick. So don’t nominate him. I promise I won’t...


19 posted on 02/22/2016 11:42:55 AM PST by carjic (Media and GOPe are making the only people I trust not electable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

NO!! I voted Cruz in primary. However, I will crawl over
rough gravel to get to the voting booth to vote NO! on
Hitler-y Clinton in the November election, and YES! on
Trump or anyone running against Hitler-y.


20 posted on 02/22/2016 11:43:30 AM PST by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson