Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Napolitano: Hillary Will Be Indicted if AG Loretta Lynch Convenes a Grand Jury
PJ Media ^ | February 29, 2016 | By Debra Heine

Posted on 03/02/2016 4:54:36 PM PST by SaveFerris

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: SaveFerris

It’s Secret Executive Order pardon time...


21 posted on 03/02/2016 5:14:06 PM PST by JJ_Folderol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus
IF grasshoppers had machine guns, there’d be a lot of dead birds.

ROFLMAO! (never heard that one before)

22 posted on 03/02/2016 5:16:21 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Loretta Lynch has no intention of pressing any charges against Hillary Clinton. The most that would come of this would be one of her former underlings laying him or herself down as a sacrificial lamb for a misdemeanor charge.

Hillary has nothing to fear.


23 posted on 03/02/2016 5:17:08 PM PST by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Hillary will be indicted by the Obama “Justice” Department when monkeys fly out of Obama’s butt.

The best that we can hope for is that career FBI agents will leak the details of their investigation after Lynch refuses the FBI’s recommendation to pursue an indictment.


24 posted on 03/02/2016 5:24:05 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
You are probably right about Loretta Lynch, but HRC shouldn't relax. If the FBI investigation concludes with a recommendation that HRC be indicted for a felony, and Lynch declines to indict, the FBI will leak the contents of the investigation. If the leaks happen before HRC is elected, Trump will hammer away about the private server and the Clinton Foundation; if the leaks happen after HRC is elected, the media, despite being in-the-tank for HRC, will not be able to resist Watergate II.
25 posted on 03/02/2016 5:26:27 PM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Hillary Clinton is destroying the Democrat Party.

In five years, you won’t be able to find anyone who will admit to being a Democrat.

Attaway Hillary! You keep fighting this! Just sneer at them! You’re better than everyone! Daddy told you so!


26 posted on 03/02/2016 5:35:07 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

I’m afraid in five years we won’t find much of what we used to know as America, either.

Thanks a lot to the DNC the last 10 years or so and their buddies, the GOP Establishment.


27 posted on 03/02/2016 5:36:50 PM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

It’s a good sign. The FBI has been working on the investigation far longer than most know. Possibly starting not long after Jan. 2014. That’s when the hacker was arrested that made them aware that Hillary had a private server.

That explains why the FBI has so many agents assigned to the investigation. There are that many criminal acts to document both as far as classified information and the other aspect involving misuse of a public office.

What we’ve heard out of Lynch recently may indicate that Hillary runs a very real chance of indictment simply because of the multitude of counts. My guess is based on the number and severity of violations she could potentially face upwards of a thousand years in prison if the sentences run consecutively.

Will that happen? I’d be surprised if it goes that far. Possibly due to national security issues she can never be brought to trial. That doesn’t mean she won’t suffer consequences. Like Petraeus she’ll be penalized. I don’t see her getting off with a misdemeanor. More than likely health issues will intervene and she’ll be out of the running for the presidency and any further public capacity.

We’re seeing history in the making. Hillary is about to become a huge liability for the Democrat party.


28 posted on 03/02/2016 5:38:52 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
" if Lynch presents their evidence to a grand jury . . . "

Yup . . . and that will occur after a land shark jumps out and bites me.

29 posted on 03/02/2016 5:42:53 PM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

And I would likely be a customer...if they made ammo too.


30 posted on 03/02/2016 5:44:45 PM PST by mcshot (The "Greatest Generation" would never have allowed the trashing of our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

IF pigs had wings, bacon would be very hard to get.....


31 posted on 03/02/2016 5:47:36 PM PST by EXCH54FE (Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

If the FBI has been investigating this for 2 years, then they may be ready to recommend an indictment before the end of Hillary’s second term.


32 posted on 03/02/2016 5:48:01 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

We’ll know the investigation is wrapping up when Hillary’s aides are subpoenaed. A judge recently said Judicial Watch could subpoena Hillary and her aides after they settled on procedure in April. I doubt the FBI will go second. If so, that means subpoenas this month or next.

Since Judicial Watch is only focused on the mishandling of classified information they are not going after the bribery that is the other part of the FBI investigation.


33 posted on 03/02/2016 5:57:51 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I’ve heard this bandied about.

Some people are making the claim that the sensitive nature of the documents will make it impossible for a GJ or a criminal jury to be seated, as even members of Congress on the Intelligence committees are not cleared to see so much as the redacted portions of some of the emails.

Hope someone here can put my mind to rest on that one.


34 posted on 03/02/2016 6:01:40 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
Judge Napolitano reported on Fox News ...

This guy is right up there with Karl Rove in prediction accuracy.

35 posted on 03/02/2016 6:04:03 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
Then the next President, Trump or Cruz, tells his new AG to convene a grand jury to indict both Hillary for her numerous felonies and ex-AG Lynch for the crimes she did in office.
36 posted on 03/02/2016 6:14:36 PM PST by MasterGunner01 ( To err is human, to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

If FYI Director Comey has any integrity he will ask that Loretta Lynch recuse herself when he makes the recommendation to pursue charges. If Lynch is actually stressing over this falling in her lap, she might actually recuse herself. We’ll never know if the request isn’t made.


37 posted on 03/02/2016 6:16:26 PM PST by Techjock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

If grasshoppers had machine guns, I’d open a factory making eency weency little cartridges.


38 posted on 03/02/2016 6:28:16 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
IF
39 posted on 03/02/2016 6:52:56 PM PST by cardinal4 (Certified Islamophobe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01; Techjock

My understanding is that Loretta Lynch is no Eric Holder.

Eric Holder was a radical first, who took part in the violent occupation of buildings while a student in Columbia University.

Lynch is less ideological, more of an ambitious climber, who leverages her Democrat Party connections to advance. She spent a lot of time as a prosecutor. Although the Party could call on her to handle cases they wanted prosecuted, she was relatively professional in handling other cases. She had a pretty positive reputation among FBI Agents who had worked in her district, when she went to her confirmation hearings.

She is much less likely to stick her neck out with a brazen abuse of office than Holder would be.


40 posted on 03/02/2016 7:01:08 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson