Posted on 04/02/2017 8:33:37 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell
Sunday, April 02, 2017
How Senate Dems Went Anti-Israel
Posted by Daniel Greenfield
On March 23, 2017, Senators had a simple choice to make. On one side was J Street; an anti-Israel pressure group that had hosted BDS activists and opposed Israel’s right to defend itself. On the other was Ambassador David Friedman, the first pro-Israel nominee in decades.
And the choice was made.
Every Democrat chose to stand with J Street with only two exceptions; Senator Robert Menendez, the last pro-national defense Democrat, and Senator Manchin.
There could hardly be a better demonstration of the descent into the fever swamps of anti-Israel politics then their decision to stand with an anti-Israel hate group whose Muslim-led student arm is waging war on campuses against the Zionist “occupation”.
Senator Schatz, who weaseled his way into his office when the Governor of Hawaii decided to appoint his minion to the job, was first in line. Schatz sniveled that Republicans had come out against Obama’s Iran deal which provided billions to terrorists. Schatz spent 5 minutes lying like a rug. Then he accused Ambassador Friedman of not being “objective” about whether Islamic terrorists destroy Israel or not.
“I take a back seat to no one in my personal and professional passion for the United States-Israel relationship,” he whined. There isn’t a seat far back enough on the longest bus in the world.
Schatz is backed by J Street. The Anti-Israel group’s PAC actively fundraised for him. It even solicited volunteers for him. J Street PAC was No. 2 in Schatz’s top 5 contributors. Brian Schatz sold his hardly used soul for a low six figures. And George Soros probably overpaid for a worthless product.
But Schatz rewarded the anti-Israel group with his undying loyalty. He joined the boycott of Netanyahu’s speech and vocally backed the deal that protects Iran’s nuclear program and pours billions into its terrorist machine. While Schatz bemoaned Ambassador Friedman’s criticism of the anti-Israel group that owned him, he did not utter its name. “J Street”, like Rumpelstiltskin or Voldemort, could not be voiced.
Next up was Senator Udall of New Mexico. Politics is the Udall family business. Udall’s father and uncle were congressmen. His cousin was a senator. J Street’s cash made it Udall’s third biggest donor. Udall was the second biggest recipient of J Street checks in the ’14 election cycle.
$157,310. That was what Udall got from the anti-Israel lobby. Now it was time for him to dance for J Street’s dirty money. And dance, he did.
Udall, who had voted to confirm numerous Obama ambassadors whose only qualifications had been their six figure checks, bemoaned Friedman’s lack of “diplomatic experience”. But he had voted for a soap opera producer who couldn’t name a strategic interest in Hungary as ambassador to Hungary.
The other Senator from J Street sputtered that Jews living in “settlements” on territory claimed by Islamic terrorists were an “obstacle to peace.” And then Udall did what Schatz had been too cowardly to do. The puppet named the puppeteer. The slave spoke the name of his master on the Senate floor.
“Most horrific, he said: J-Street supporters . . . are far worse than kapos,” Udall blithered.
Above all else a man who criticized Udall’s paymasters could not be tolerated. Why not? Because J Street signs the checks. And if J Street’s haters are kapos, what does that make him?
But then it was time to send in the clown. Next up in J Street’s batting order was the Senator from Saturday Night Live. Senator Franken had received no money from J Street. Not a penny. And he’s up for reelection in 2020. Minnesota’s second biggest joke on America was left-wing enough for J Street money. He was anti-Israel enough for J Street money. And doggone it, J Street ought to like him.
Schatz and Udall were bought and paid for by J Street. Al Franken was auditioning for cash. It was hard to know which of them was sadder and more despicable. Schatz and Udall were kept men of the anti-Israel lobby. Franken was flagging down Jeremy Ben-Ami's car in a trench coat and offering his services.
Franken had moved from comedy to politics because he was only unintentionally funny. The author of Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot and Lies: And the Lying Liars Who Tell Them lectured that, "Diplomacy means not resorting to insults and to name-calling when you have a disagreement."
And Ambassador Friedman had insulted the nice men and women whom Franken hoped would write him a nice big check so he could go on being Senator Franken instead of having to play Stuart Smalley on a nostalgia cruise where he would be sharing equal billing with Legionnaire’s Disease. “Mr. Friedman,” Franken lisped, “called supporters of the American Jewish Organization J Street ’far worse than kapos.’''
Schatz and Udall had been satisfied with noting the grave insult to their paymaster and moving on. But Franken was auditioning and so he went all out singing the praises of J Street.
"J Street is a pro-Israel organization dedicated to the two-state solution," Franken flattered. Insulting J Street members was a "calumny” and should be a "disqualifier". It was "profoundly insensitive". If J Street doesn’t send Franken a check after this, its terrorist supporters have hearts like stones.
"Mr. Friedman's offensive remarks don't stop there," Senator Franken huffed. "He even called me a clown and a moron."
There’s no doubt that Ambassador Friedman’s remarks were deeply offensive to clowns and morons. The clown and moron community deserves an apology for being compared to Senator Franken.
But why did Friedman call Franken a clown and a moron? It was over Franken’s attacks on a Trump ad critical of George Soros. Soros helped fund J Street.
After Franken had made his appeal for J Street money, it was back to those senators lucky enough to already be riding the anti-Israel lobby’s gravy train.
Senator Leahy (J Street PAC - $44,588) got up to denounce the insult to J Street without actually naming his 3rd biggest donor. “We all want what is best for the American people,” he sniveled.
Leahy’s definition of the “American people” is a left-wing Hungarian billionaire.
Senator Van Hollen (J Street PAC - $66,506) took a more unique approach by objecting to Friedman’s description of our Islamic “allies” as “cowards”, “hypocrites” and “freeloaders”. It could just as easily have been a description of Van Hollen and his cowardly, hypocritical, freeloading colleagues.
And then it was finally over. Every Democrat, but one, who had spoken against Friedman, was owned by J Street. And every Democrat, but two voted for J Street. And why not? It’s good money.
Senator Schumer betrayed his Jewish constituents. He sided with J Street. So did Senator Cardin. So did almost all of the rest. But this was what the Dems had become.
The contentious vote to confirm an ambassador is highly unusual.
Senate Dems had no objection when Obama sold the ambassadorships of the UK, Japan, France, Canada, Italy and Germany to the highest bidder. ($3.5 mil for the UK, $2.5 mil France, $2 mil Japan, $1.7 mil Switzerland, $1.5 mil Belgium, Canada $1 mil and Germany $1.5 mil.)
Obama appointed his campaign finance manager, John Kerry’s cousin, married to the heiress of the Jack Daniel’s liquor empire, ambassador to the UK. The Senate confirmed him by unanimous consent. The wife of the former CEO of eBay, who kicked in $2 mil, was named Ambassador to the United Nations Human Rights Council. He made a soap opera producer who raised over $500K, the ambassador to Hungary and the producer of Dr. Dolittle 2, who raised millions for him, the ambassador to Denmark.
This grotesque parade of hideous corruption was approved with unanimous consent when in a more honest time everyone involved in this would be sitting under spotlights in an interrogation room.
Senator McCain put up a fight over the soap opera ambassador. McCain asked her, “What are our strategic interests in Hungary?” The Bold and the Beautiful producer spewed gibberish. The vote came to the Senate floor. The Democrats who voted against Friedman voted for her. Franken, Schumer, Gillibrand, Udall, Schatz; the whole miserable gang of liars, scoundrels and hypocrites.
But it’s not our Ambassador to Hungary who matters, but the Hungarian who owns the Democrats.
Senate Dems ought to be made to answer why the choice of Ambassador to Israel should be determined by an anti-Israel pressure group funded by George Soros, a Hungarian billionaire who described his role in the Holocaust as “the most exciting time of my life”, and Consolacion Esdicul who works for a Hong Kong gambler? They ought to be made to answer why they stand with Soros and the PLO over Israel.
Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center
Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.
I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.
I recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.
FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought.
Lou
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fiGVhiSe7Es/UC2iXPZr6dI/AAAAAAAAIBo/dnH7JqKKqVQ/s1600/sidepicture.jpg"left")
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post.
The dimoKKKRATS could go 100% against Israel and 65-70% of the Jews will still vote for them.
Greenfield is right on target. The Democrats are now the drug-addled (money addled) prostitutes of George Soros, the Pritzkers, and other leftist Jewish donors who are KAPOS in every sense of the word.
I’m Jewish. My European family was exterminated in Austria/Hungary/Poland.
I grew up a few blocks from Ben Cardin’s house. Never knew him but his mother and father were honorable people and big supporters of Israel and many charities.
Ben Cardin is an intellectual (I use the word disparagingly) lightweight, just like Rep. Von Hallen and former Sen. Mikulski (D-Md).
Schatz is a Marxist fool and from what I read in Hawaiian newspapers, possibly ethical and maybe a criminal, but I’ll leave that to the new Dept. of Justice to uncover.
Al Franken. Won a crooked election with the help of the Minnesota Secy of State, Mark Ritchie, who was uncovered in Communist Party documents to be viewed as one of their own. See his page at www.keywiki.org, under Mark Ritchie. I think there might be a photo to go with the article.
Remember, Sen. Norman Coleman (R-Minn) lost by only 600 votes or so, discovered after the initial counting. Minnesota not only has Islamic jihadists up the ying-yang, but also a good bunch of mixed reds posing as Democrats.
Leahy - should have been jailed for leaking classified information many years ago. The man is insane and mumbles like the village drunk.
As for the rest, they are Democrats (except Menendez and Manchin show some important independence and should become Republicans).
Today’s Democrat is tomorrow’s Marxist, but hey, it’s just about tomorrow re the clock so they will become “tomorrow’s Marxists”.
And the rest of the Jewish Democrats in Congress aren’t worth a damned either. I can say it, they are “treif” - dirty, stupid, lockstep marching neo-Marxists/fascists, and enemies of America.
They are a disgrace to those honorable Jewish politicians who went before them, esp. Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn), Sam Steiger (R-Ariz), and others.
It has some very good articles, well thought out and not sensationalized, at least a number of them.
I would think that most wealthy Conservative Jews would come from liberal cities/states and therefore wouldn’t have a chance of winning on a ticket.
I’m thinking the same goes for wealthy NYers of any ilk.
And as there are a large number of Jews in NYC, the conservatives among them have little chance for higher office.
It’s a shame.
I have plenty of middle class conservative Jewish friends. But middle class money combined with integrity make it hard to run for office.
I think that’s pretty much already happened. Only the percentage of American Jews voting for Dems is probably higher.
The integrity issue - and the viciousness of politics - keep *most* decent people out of the game now.
I’m still amazed - though grateful - that people like Trump and Pence would put themselves and their families through this.
Un-masking horrible democrats... great post. Thanks.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
To call them democrats anymore is ridiculous. Full of nothing but perverts, commies, enemy islamists and their facilitators.
And only slightly less feces slimy are their their so-called “conservative” republican counterparts.
No doubt Trump has integrity, but he also has a vicious streak.
Good.
No doubt Trump has integrity, but he also has a vicious streak.
Good.
I think there’s a difference between ‘vicious’ and simply ‘aware and smart’.
Business doesn’t necessarily teach viciousness, unless one is inclined that way. But it definitely teaches smarts.
Listen I love Trump, but comparing carson’s behavior to that of a serial rapist is vicious, not “aware and smart”
Trump can be and is vicious at time. Like I said, good.
People on here try so hard to make him a saint.
He’s a man. A good man. And a very good American.
He ain’t a saint.
Trump runs off at the mouth sometimes - he’s not an accomplished speaker, or drilled in the ways of political mealy-mouth speak.
I don’t believe that it is evidence of his true nature or heart, and I don’t think Carson believes that, either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.