Posted on 06/04/2017 3:26:14 PM PDT by impetrio1
If you ever want to know who may be behind a crime or terror attack, listen to the words of most of the PC media.
They will come right out and identify a suspect if that person is white and has an Anglo-sounding name. However if you don't get that identifier (or heaven forbid, "profile"), it's either a minority or in the case of a terror attack, you'll have to wait a few hours or more into their coverage before you hear the words "Islam" or "Muslim", if at all.
(Excerpt) Read more at blackandblondemedia.com ...
I just watched an NBC correspondent report from London. She said they were still trying to establish a motive! WTF? The motive is Islam, you dirty witch!
So how's that fund raising going over at your blog?
I sure hope you are able to draw a lot of traffic from Free Republic.
You're awesome.
I am sure that cnn reported that out of control London cops shot 3 undocumented immigrants to death after they commited a traffic offense onsome bridge. The headlines make the story.
What is their reasoning for protecting these muslim terrorists? Over here it’s a variety... from obama is a muslim... to wanting their votes.. But the main basic reason is they take the opposite side from conservatives. They throw away all the cautions and safety, ...to be politically correct... to step all over the ones who are trying to right this ship of fools that obama has wrought.
In the UK, and Germany and France, they ignore all the things they see happening and what do they gain? They elected a muslim for mayor of London and that had to be accomplished by the numbers of muslims that live there. What do they think they are accomplishing to ignore the terrorists elephants in the room and put everyone in jeopardy? I guess the public could just stay within their doors and not go anywhere except to maybe work, but that’s giving in and letting the other side control.
But these terrorists do not deserve anything but the firing squad. And if the Supreme Court decides in favor of the lower courts, that will just give the terrorists living here, the green light.. and more to come. If they do decide in favor of more to come, it’s time to rebel.. in fact it’s over time.
I can’t stand anything to be decided in favor of anything obama had anything to do with! His crowing makes me ill!
Barnum & Bailey midget performers are responsible. They are unemployed with extra time on their hands.
Why radical Islam is a dirty word:
My opinion- it isn’t the term radical or Islam, it is what follows after uttering the term - and that is: Defining who they are and what they believe.
If politicians define what ‘group’ they all belong to (radical Islam), then they must define ‘what are the goals of said group’ besides killing people. That’s the part they don’t want to be widely known. And it isn’t because they don’t want to offend Islam, they don’t want the public to know what percentage of Muslims agree with radicals and their goals. It is cultural divide that cannot be bridged.
The responsibility for the London attacks lies with the British government who allowed these barbarians in even after they saw the handwriting on the wall when muslims demanded sharia law in Britain.
The British government owe their citizens an apology just as the US government owe their citizenry apologies for the many muzzies that are presently making this country an unsafe country to reside in.
But politician and accountability is an oxymoron.
PC media loves murderous muslims!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.