Posted on 01/22/2018 6:04:07 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
The good news is that everyone in America will reap the rewards of an improved economy and tax reform
The latest women’s march is more proof that these leftists—and they all are leftists—are empty-headed imbeciles. Billed as demonstrations in support of “female empowerment,” this march of ugly, angry leftists doesn’t understand that the rest of us are laughing at them. They are having an annual emotional flare-up, a temper tantrum, but they can’t articulate what they are upset about.
“People are realizing we can’t just march, we have to vote,” said Regina Bateson, a leftist candidate for Congress running against Republican Rep. Tom McClintock, the Sacramento Bee reported. Does Ms. Bateson and her fellow marchers not know that the 19th amendment, which granted women the right to vote, was passed by Congress June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920?
These ugly women are pink-hatted haters. When interviewed by Rachel Campos-Duffy of Fox News on Saturday, they bragged about hating the President.
My provider told me that she was going to DC last November for a conference. She said that she was going to have to break her own rule to not go to DC unless she was going to kill Donald Trump.
She thought that what she was saying was amusing and bold.
Yes, I am looking for a new provider.
empty-headed imbeciles , WOW, hit it right on the head ,LOL
Women who wear likenesses of their genitals atop their heads. I’m happy to be married to a woman who thinks it’s ridiculous and embarrassing.
“granted women the right to vote”
Part of the problem.
Was the march paid for by Abortion Clinics or George Soros? Signs don’t print themselves...
Who paid for the party... who bought the speakers? Who rented the buses?
AND yeah, it matters. Maybe Katy Grimes can look into it.
...this march of ugly, angry leftists doesn’t understand that the rest of us are laughing at them. They are having an annual emotional flare-up, a temper tantrum, but they can’t articulate what they are upset about.
“protesting” isn’t enough to change anything. They have no actual arguments or data or facts - there is no substance.
I love her, bless her heart, but she bought into the feminist lie that "she could have it all" - career, kids, marriage when it became convenient.
The plan was to pursue her career (she's an architect, and she spent her junior year studying in Florence, Italy - she's hardly some poor, oppressed victim) until she was a financial success, at which point she would marry a rich, handsome, never-married before bachelor (somebody who made more than she did) and then she'd have children.
Only problem is, now that she's in her late 30's, the rich, handsome bachelors aren't available to her anymore.
The rich, handsome bachelors are with hot women 10 - 15 years younger than her. All that's left are "leftovers" - Divorced men paying half of all they owned for child support and alimony, or losers she would never considered when she was 21.
And as the realization crept in, in turn she became a rather bitter feminist. (She was already a feminist, but now she is a BITTER feminist.) And as time passes on, I don't see things getting any better.
She's turned into a Trump-hating left winger, and she's just kind of swirling around the toilet bowl, watching the bottom get closer and closer.
And she has feminism to thank for that.
““protesting” isn’t enough to change anything. They have no actual arguments or data or facts - there is no substance.”
When did that matter to democrats?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.