Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin's aggressive policies cost Russia 180,000 new births in 2017 alone
Window on Eurasia ^ | Mar 2018 | Andrey Illarionov

Posted on 03/22/2018 12:54:12 PM PDT by GoldenState_Rose

Russia has had to pay a demographic price for Vladimir Putin’s aggression in Ukraine and Syria amounting to 180,000 children who would have been born save for Kremlin policies.

According to Rosstat, Russian mothers gave birth to 203,000 babies fewer in 2017 than they had the year before, a decline of 10.7 percent. This year, they are on pace to give birth to 360,000 fewer than in 2017, a decline that matches those in the first post-Soviet years.

Given that marriages did not decline in number but in fact rose last year, one has to ask: What has happened with the birthrate? Why has such a sharp decline occurred?

Putin has an answer: he says it is because of the demographic waves that Russia has had to live with since the massive losses in World War II.

A longstanding staple of his regime is that the capitalism of “the wild 1990s,” by driving down birthrates, led to a more dramatic decline in the population of the Russian Federation than did even the repressions of the Stalin period.

If Putin were right, then the birthrate should have fallen in the early 2000s when the number of women began to decline rather than in 2017 when that decline began to level off.

But in 2017, the fertility rate plunged by “a catastrophic 10 percent."

Some demographers suggest that it reflects in the first instance the end of government subsidies to stimulate the birthrate; others point to the impact of the deepening socio-economic crisis in which Russia finds itself.

“Besides this,” “the social catastrophe of 2014-2016 was probably deepened by the especially aggressive foreign policy of the Kremlin carried out since the annexation of Crimea.

(Excerpt) Read more at windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: birthrates; demographics; putin; russia; russianpropagandists; russianpuppets; russianstooges; russiasucks; sanctions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2018 12:54:13 PM PDT by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

And abortion in the U.S. cost 900,000.


2 posted on 03/22/2018 12:58:27 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

“Russian mothers gave birth to 203,000 babies fewer in 2017”
The US produced about 360,000 fewer babies that year thanks to Planned Parenthood.


3 posted on 03/22/2018 1:00:18 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

The current US birth rates are not high enough to maintain the size of the U.S. population


4 posted on 03/22/2018 1:06:55 PM PDT by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

When baby bonuses stop, it is hardly surprising the birth rate falls.


5 posted on 03/22/2018 1:07:44 PM PDT by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose
This is interesting but, in my ignorance, I don't quite grasp what it means.

Russia's military take-over of Crimea and the incursions into Donbass -- curtailed Russian fertility how?

Was it because the number of Russian military men who were actively engaged or on standby, means less husband-wife togetherness at home: the men were simply away and unable to sire children?

Or is it becuse military expenditures caused the Russian government to cut back on social spending, such as, as I understand it, bonuses and extra services directed to childbearing families?

Or a kind of psychological malaise, a depletion of confidence in the future, which makes people no-so-eager to bring children into this world?

What's going on here?

6 posted on 03/22/2018 1:07:59 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts." - Sgt. Joe Friday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“Russia’s military take-over of Crimea and the incursions into Donbass — curtailed Russian fertility how?”

Exactly! The statistics in the article are interesting, but the causes the author claims? Make no sense. I think the writers ideological biases caused them to totally miss what is going on.


7 posted on 03/22/2018 1:10:49 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

“Some demographers suggest that it reflects in the first instance the end of government subsidies to stimulate the birthrate; others point to the impact of the deepening socio-economic crisis in which Russia finds itself.”

Sounds a lot more plausible than foreign policy.


8 posted on 03/22/2018 1:10:53 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

The only explanation that makes sense is Putin’s foreign policy caused the West to slap sanctions on Russia which caused or at least exacerbated the slumping economy in Russia. I suppose you could make a decent argument for that but the author never spelled that out. Sloppy writing.


9 posted on 03/22/2018 1:20:22 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

Pooty-poo is no Genghis Khan.


10 posted on 03/22/2018 1:40:18 PM PDT by rfp1234 (I have already previewed this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234
Pooty-poo is no Genghis Khan.

Are you referring to the oft-heard assertion that Genghis is related to something like 1/4 of the Chinese population? And Putin is stuck with just this:

Or, perhaps this:


11 posted on 03/22/2018 2:18:45 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

Roflol... that is a stupid article


12 posted on 03/22/2018 3:04:49 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

yes, but who says we have to ‘maintain the size’ ?


13 posted on 03/22/2018 3:18:50 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

Putin should support banning abortion.


14 posted on 03/22/2018 3:19:25 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Former USSR has the highest abortion rates in the world. 900,000 abortions is Russia’s current abortion rate (not counting illegal ones) - and their overall population is half that of USA. 900,000 is also a marked improvement from prior decade when abortions in Russia outnumbered births by half at times...


15 posted on 03/22/2018 3:38:56 PM PDT by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ; Mrs. Don-o

Yes the article is a translation of one intended for Russian audiences which already grasp the impact economic sanctions had had, and also the recession Russia was already in by the time Crimea was annexed.


16 posted on 03/22/2018 3:41:24 PM PDT by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

The stats speak for themselves regardless about the debate over causes. Putin has had to address demographics quite often.

The was intended for a Russian audience or those already aware of the economic conditions of the country pre-Crimea and the impact sanctions have had post-Crimea.


17 posted on 03/22/2018 3:43:51 PM PDT by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I’m surprised that there has not yet been a veritable tsunami of Freeper males offering to travel to Russia at their own expense and do their part to help ameliorate or rectify this enormous demogaphic situation of beautiful young nubile Russian women tragically left without a bun in the oven...


18 posted on 03/22/2018 4:51:05 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldenState_Rose
Low birth rates?

Would you want to live in this pile and try to raise children?

One of the nicer apartment rooms

In the rural areas, living can be hell......

Third world country, third world problems. Welcome to Russia -still today.

19 posted on 03/22/2018 4:55:51 PM PDT by ASOC (Having humility really means one is rarely humiliated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

And what’s the point in posting the picture of a estate bulding being demolished? Especially with the one being constructed in the backstage.


20 posted on 03/23/2018 2:24:00 AM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson