Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Double Standard: NY Judge Rules That Restaurants, Bars Can Refuse Service to Trump Supporters
IWB ^ | Chris Black

Posted on 04/26/2018 2:38:27 PM PDT by davikkm

Motto: All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others – Animal Farm, George Orwell

Speaking of activist judges who legislate from the bench, and the immense hypocrisy and double measure which is the main feature of the “left side of the force”, today’s news is about a New York judge who ruled on Wednesday that, let me quote, “supporting Trump is not a religion”, henceforth bars and restaurants can refuse to serve people wearing MAGA hats, i.e. Trump supporters. But no one else? How does this work exactly? This strange ruling comes in the aftermath of some “normie” looking dude’s claim that he was denied service and also asked to leave a NY bar, back in January 2017, just because he was wearing a MAGA hat, which probably triggered “liberals” in the area.

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 1moretime; discrimination; doublestandard; nyjudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2018 2:38:28 PM PDT by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davikkm

The argument being made was on religious grounds. Political beliefs are not religious beliefs. I’m no lawyer but The judge probably made the right decision. The suit should have been brought on grounds that he was discriminated against based on political beliefs.


2 posted on 04/26/2018 2:43:06 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (If we disarmed democrats gun violence would decrease by 90%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Brick

Window

Some assembly required


3 posted on 04/26/2018 2:45:45 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

So much for our system of injustice.

Let’s ban judges from our places (we don’t like their immigration and sanctuary city ideas).
And anyone we know has been a talking head on CNN or MSNBC can’t get in (on general prejudice grounds plus denial of ugly people getting in).

That’s all okay now, or just bias against Trump people?Yeah, just against Trump people. That’s what I thought.


4 posted on 04/26/2018 2:47:18 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we're finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

This “judge” might have opened a can of worms in setting a precedent for businesses to have the right to “discriminate”, for ANY reason.

This should translate to “I didn’t refuse to bake the wedding cake because they were gay, I refused because they were Hillary and Obama supporters.”

A business, is a business, is a business...and if they have live “customers”, the same rules should apply to them all.

So, businesses...feel free to post signs that say, “ATTENTION - WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE AND PRODUCTS TO LIBERALS/DEMOCRATS, INCLUDING SUPPORTERS OF HILLARY CLINTON AND BARACK OBAMA”.

See how that goes over.

Fight fire with fire.


5 posted on 04/26/2018 2:48:13 PM PDT by FrankR (An armed society is a polite society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Related: NY Post article posted earlier with 131 replies:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3650359/posts


6 posted on 04/26/2018 2:48:26 PM PDT by upchuck (Keep a sharp lookout. The best is yet to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Its a common-sense decision

So don’t me bake a cake for homosexuals.


7 posted on 04/26/2018 2:49:12 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

That means that anyone of us could open up a bar in the the West Village and post a sign that says “Trump Supporters Only! No Democrats, RINOS, Liberals, Socialists or Advocates of the LGBTQ Agenda Allowed.”


8 posted on 04/26/2018 2:49:58 PM PDT by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Send in overtly gay Trump supporters wearing MAGA caps or T-shirts.


9 posted on 04/26/2018 2:51:26 PM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

If a political stance is grounds for being refused public accommodation at a restaurant or a bar, is it also okay to refuse to hire or to rent housing to somebody whose politics offend the owner?


10 posted on 04/26/2018 2:51:36 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Find a Trump friendly place to spend your money


11 posted on 04/26/2018 2:53:16 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

So... you can also then refuse to serve “gay supporters?”


12 posted on 04/26/2018 2:53:31 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue
That means that anyone of us could open up a bar in the the West Village and post a sign that says “Trump Supporters Only! No Democrats, RINOS, Liberals, Socialists or Advocates of the LGBTQ Agenda Allowed.”

The caveat, if I understand the ruling, is that you have to discriminate politically, because that is not protected. You can't discriminate based on race or gender orientation.

"Sorry, get lost--it's not personal, it's political."

Or, the case was poorly pleaded technically, so there was an absurd result from following the details of the law rather than the intent. Pick one.

13 posted on 04/26/2018 2:54:25 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

This would, hypothetically, enable discrimination against blacks on the grounds that any person could reasonably assume they voted for Hillary.


14 posted on 04/26/2018 2:55:17 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Homosexual activism is a political issue, by ANY standard. That means that wedding merchants can deny them service on politically ideological grounds.

Glad that’s cleared up.


15 posted on 04/26/2018 2:56:09 PM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

I wish, with all my heart, that I could purchase a beautiful red MAGA hat and wear it proudly in public!!!

I live in the Baltimore suburbs, and while my county voted for President Trump, I am apprehensive about causing trouble!!!

Finally, it’s so hard for me to understand why virtually every American citizen wouldn’t want to show their support for our magnificent POTUS!!! We ought to be grateful GOD for blessing us with such a superb leader at this pivotal juncture in history!!!


16 posted on 04/26/2018 2:56:57 PM PDT by edie1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Yet bakeries are forced to make wedding cakes for queer “marriages.”

It’s time to purge the courts by impeachments and convictions.


17 posted on 04/26/2018 3:02:28 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Yet bakeries are forced to make wedding cakes for queer “marriages.”

It’s time to purge the courts by impeachments and convictions.


18 posted on 04/26/2018 3:03:24 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Being that the judge cannot render impartial decisions, the judge needs to be removed from the bench.


19 posted on 04/26/2018 3:04:18 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Chivalry is not dead. It is a warriors code and only practiced by warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Especially political for the baker who gladly sold any baked goods or would bake a cake for homosexuals, just not a WEDDING cake.


20 posted on 04/26/2018 3:12:13 PM PDT by Anima Mundi (Socialism is theft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson