VANITY: Liberal college pal going nuts about Kavanaugh asks the following...

Self ^ | 10-9-18 | Self

[scottiemom]

I scratch my head as to why Kavanaugh is considered by the masses as a far right conservative. (Please don't misunderstand.I am one of his biggest fans.) He's only slightly right of moderate. Further, he is a staunch proponent of precedence in law. He has used the term quot;established law" on numerous occasions. I take this to mean he's not out to change the nation by changing past law. In time, when laws are challenged, I feel certain he will fairly and dutifully assess them. Having said that, I wish the court would issue a reiteration of states rights with regard to public safety and community standards regarding the right to protest. I fear what is surely coming from what I have seen so far. We have rules and laws not being followed. Will it tie the deaths of innocent citizens to reexamine and restrict these low life ruffians?

Just an opinion: The "blowhard" doesn't qualify as a "friend" in my thinking. (Just because you have common acquaintances and have known him for years.) I'd look for an ulterior motive in seeking to get information from someone diametrically opposed to my political beliefs. I really sense he's just setting you up so he can "zing" you.

[SuperLuminal]

Advice: Go to Walmart and buy yourself some balls!

[Deaf Smith]

Dual Citizenship.

That the oath of US Citizenship is binding, all foreign allegiance is renounced. Violate and you're deported.

[Sapwolf]

Threadwinner

[sauropod]

bump

[piasa]

I just want to insure that new judges never utter something along the lines of : “...before I rule on this case, I want to see what the Cuban high court ruled in a similar...”

[LexBaird]

Overturn Wickard v. Filburn.

This.

[missthethunder]

One of the questions you could ask him is....

Do you believe Gov should control their people or
should people control their Gov?

[Jimmy Valentine]

Yes! Keli was bad law

[TIElniff]

No responses offered until your friend answers three questions:

1. Define what you mean by “adult-type responses.”
2. Who is going to decide what an “adult-type response” is?
3. Is there any amount of fact or logic that will cause you to change your mind on any of these issues?

[Sans-Culotte]

You must be bored to be bothered with something like this. I will go out of my way to avoid people such as that and they go back a lot further than the ‘80’s...more like the ‘50’s. Life is too short to put up with non thinkers. Try corresponding with someone who still lives in Ithaca, NY - with the exception of FReeper Behind Liberal Lines.

That is my take as well. I no longer keep up with my college friends form the 70's. They are either stupid or willfully blind to reality. I have no time for such people, and I do not want to be friends with people who would destroy the Republic.

A few years ago, when I still had a Fakebook account, I received a friend request from a college classmate. I looked at his profile, and his favorite TV show was Rachel Maddow. Only a leftist loon would list that as his favorite show. Needless to say, I did not respond to his request.

[N. Theknow]

Declare Obamacare unconstitutional as it was previously ruled a tax which did not originate in the House but originated in the Senate.

[Thank You Rush]

Fakebook - I like that.... One of the friends I mentioned in Ithaca, NY told me recently the only news shows she watches are: Rachel Maddow and NBC. Since I didn’t feel like getting into IT with her, I let it slide..I wanted so bad to tell her that she’s not getting anywhere near the truth doing that but there’s no sense in trying to talk common sense to people like that.

We have friends out in the state of WA who don’t have cable so she is pretty much at the mercy of network news so I let her know what’s really going on in politics. She appreciates it. Amazing when we compare what she hears with what is carried on cable or the internet. Oh! - she doesn’t have internet either...her husband is too paranoid to sign up...I tell her she needs a new husband but after 60+ years - why bother? Too much work training them.

[seawolf101]

Women are, in all too many cases, totally unfair to women who play by the rules in a moral and ethical manner. Multiply a few crazy women in politics and they have demonstrated they are too crazy in general to have the power of the vote.

The same holds true for racial minorities in this country. The moment they want to get out of the Democratic plantation they are ridiculed.