Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PANTSUIT ON FIRE: PolitiFact Debunks Hillary’s Voter Suppression Lies
Liberty Headlines ^ | September 21, 2019 | Joshua Paladino

Posted on 09/21/2019 8:30:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Clinton learned the inaccurate figure from a partisan voter suppression analysis…

(Joshua Paladino, Liberty Headlines) Hillary Clinton continued her excuses tour on Sept. 17, claiming that she lost the 2016 presidential election due to “voter suppression,” but PolitiFact Wisconsin struck down her claim, rating it “mostly false.”

“The best estimate is that 200,000 people in Wisconsin were either denied or chilled in their efforts to vote,” Clinton said without evidence. “I don’t think we believed at the time, before the election, that it would be anything like that, anything as big as that.”

Clinton learned the inaccurate figure from a partisan voter suppression analysis conducted by Priorities USA Action, a PAC “that supported Clinton and Barack Obama,” PolitiFact reported.

Wisconsin passed a law that requires citizens to present photo identification before voting, and the law took effect in time for the 2016 elections.

Priorities USA Action’s report found that voter turnout between the 2012 and 2016 elections “increased 1.3 percent in states in which there was no change to voter ID laws, but decreased 3.3 percent in Wisconsin.”

PolitiFact said the report attributes the fall in voter turnout solely to the voter ID law, whereas a “lack of enthusiasm for Clinton or Trump, or perhaps a belief that Trump couldn’t win Wisconsin” could have contributed to the decline.

(Excerpt) Read more at libertyheadlines.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; politifact; prioritiesusaaction; shesjustaliar; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2019 8:30:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She’s running AGAIN!


2 posted on 09/21/2019 8:35:49 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

3 posted on 09/21/2019 8:42:39 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The sorest loser ever.


4 posted on 09/21/2019 8:44:17 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
At this point, what difference does it make?
5 posted on 09/21/2019 8:45:03 PM PDT by atc23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
She’s running AGAIN!

We can only hope!


6 posted on 09/21/2019 8:47:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
She’s running AGAIN!

3 gets you 5 that’s an accurate prediction. Warren is a one trick pony, with her wal mart greeter like hand waving and vulgar promises of free giveaways to democrat protected victim class supporters. Parasites. Biden will likely stroke out long before the convention as well. I could see Mrs Clinton Scalia any front runner in her way to get a nomination where she loses again to the Trump Curse.

7 posted on 09/21/2019 8:52:18 PM PDT by atc23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


8 posted on 09/21/2019 8:54:31 PM PDT by bitt (Trump stole pancakes from his distant cousin. Huh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atc23

Agreed. She’s running.
A Foxnews poll found a significant number of Biden supporters wish someone else would enter the RAT race.
The only reason they support Biden is because everyone else in the RAT party who is running is just too ridiculous to consider.


9 posted on 09/21/2019 9:20:01 PM PDT by Senormechanico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: atc23

Agreed. She’s running.
A Foxnews poll found a significant number of Biden supporters wish someone else would enter the RAT race.
The only reason they support Biden is because everyone else in the RAT party who is running is just too ridiculous to consider.


10 posted on 09/21/2019 9:20:01 PM PDT by Senormechanico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Paladin2
My instinct is she is she is trying to have some influence over the DNC. All of those suppressed votes were Democrats who stayed home. She is a political kiss of death right now. The only reason for her to draw attention to herself is to try to influence the DNC somehow.
11 posted on 09/21/2019 9:43:51 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

She is up to something for damn sure. And whatever it is[unless she falls over dead] is not going to be good for us.


12 posted on 09/21/2019 9:45:55 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Senormechanico

I agree that she’d love to run, and I imagine that she spends a lot of time these days fantasizing about some kind of brokered convention next summer at which the Dems turn to her say, “Help us, Obi Wan, you’re our only hope.”

I just don’t see that happening, though. No one has even voted yet, and it already seems to be down to a three-person race, Biden, Bernie and Beth. I think Biden is destined to fade, as voters are exposed to more of his early-stage dementia personality. So then it’s down to Warren and Sanders. And even though their platforms are very similar, at some point, the powers that be are going consolidate behind Warren as the more presentable, less overtly insane candidate.


13 posted on 09/21/2019 9:46:46 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

https://dailytruthreport.com/gambling-website-says-2020-candidate-for-dems-will-be-hillary-clinton/

Gambling Website Says 2020 Candidate For Dems Will Be….Hillary Clinton!


14 posted on 09/21/2019 10:15:46 PM PDT by bitt (Trump stole pancakes from his distant cousin. Huh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

She may be thinking that the best way to avoid jail is to run for president.


15 posted on 09/21/2019 10:30:10 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bitt

https://dailytruthreport.com/gambling-website-says-2020-candidate-for-dems-will-be-hillary-clinton/

Gambling Website Says 2020 Candidate For Dems Will Be….Hillary Clinton

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Are the Dems planning a stealth “write-in” candidate? They always said she should have been crowned in 2016.

I think at this point they could have a “write-in” for “anyone other than those running.”


16 posted on 09/21/2019 10:50:51 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Senormechanico

“She’s running’’. Running? This train wreck of an old broad can’t even walk.


17 posted on 09/21/2019 10:57:04 PM PDT by jmacusa ("If wisdom is not the Lord, what is wisdom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If Politifact is saying this about Hillary, it’s because the DNC says it is OK to say so. She’s Toast.


18 posted on 09/21/2019 11:57:54 PM PDT by CptnObvious (Question her now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"PANTSUIT ON FIRE"

______________________


19 posted on 09/22/2019 3:09:05 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it divine ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Showing ID is SUPPRESSION?? LOL!! The Dems think that all Black People are too STUPID to know how to get a picture ID!! THEY ARE THE RACISTS!


20 posted on 09/22/2019 4:21:53 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson