Posted on 10/31/2019 9:11:00 AM PDT by Heartlander
”This Charade MUST STOP NOW!”
It will not stop unless it is stopped by force.
Many criminals never stop until incarcerated or eliminated. Witness events of these days.
Dan does a nice job of connecting the dots. He has it all figured out.
Many criminals never stop until incarcerated or eliminated. Witness events of these days.
Verified account
@IvankaTrump
2h2 hours ago
More
“…surrounded by enemies and spies catching and perverting every word that falls from my lips or flows from my pen, and inventing where facts fail them.” -Thomas Jefferson’s reflections on Washington, D.C. in a letter to his daughter Martha.
Some things never change, dad!
“It will not stop unless it is stopped by force.”
Exactly so.
Good on Rush and others for reporting his name. It’s Hannity’s turn now.
Who's going to force it? No one, I suspect.
It is interesting that the Democrats took their vote on Halloween. Halloween has been compared to the feast of Esther in some ways. Have you thought about how similar Adam Schiff is to Haman? Also, the Torah portion this week is Noach, which is Genesis 6:9-11:32. Remember “Noah, the man of the earth, drank of the wine, became drunk, and uncovered himself within his tent. Ham, the father of Canaan, saw his father’s nakedness and told his two brothers outside.” (Genesis 9:20-22).
The Democrats in the US House are drunk with power, and they are exposing themselves. Noah was castrated by Ham, so the significance that Noah’s nakedness was exposed and his future progeny was determined after he was exposed by eliminating any considerations for future additonal siblings. The fact that it occurred on Halloween, which has been compared with Esther, is another point of interest. The whole story of Esther is palace intrigue, where the Jewish People were to be murdered because of taking advantage of drunken power. It boomeranged on Haman, who was killed and left with a negative legacy that will last for.
Adam Schiff, Haman? And what happened to Haman?
It will not stop unless it is stopped by force.
And who legally has that authority? And by force means what?
I would love it if One America News would just officially name Eric Cinderella as the whistle leaker, citing his bias and coordination with Congress in violation of true whistleblower rules as disqualifications for anonymity protections.
What is Schiff going to due? Spank them?
What a joke. Holdovers should all have gotten the pink slip day one.
1701 16th ST NW #748 Washington DC 20009
His phone is (203) 217-0131
This matter has moved far, far beyond questions of “legal authority”.
Congress has legal authority to remove the President under certain circumstances.
When they remove THIS President, it will be most unclear whether or not those circumstances have been proven or even alleged in a coherent way.
This will cause dissension among the men with the guns, and then, who knows what happens.
So no one has the legal authority to kibosh a rogue and criminal congress
except for “a well armed militia?” Im hoping we’re not yet at that point, for if so, the nukes of all countries will end up being tested.
Wow. I wonder how many press people are going to be outside his residence.
Call hearings and subpoena everyone who appears on the house side. Subpoena Shifty for a list of witnesses.
Why is this guy still on the government payroll? Trump shoulda had him fired.
Same with Pompey... he has leakers and all sorts of slime in the State Department, but does nothing about them
Don’t forget, “The Stupid Party.” Republicans have no guts and no common sense.
Don’t forget, “The Warren Court.”Did you ever wonder why the laws against pornography and libel survived the ratification of the First Amendment? Antonin Scalia explained.
As Freepers generally know, ratification of the Constitution was a close-run thing. The opposition of the Antifederalists focused on the absence from the document of a bill of rights. So as a price of getting the Constitution itself ratified, the Federalists promised what became the first ten amendments, which we know of as the Bill of Rights.
The Federalists were on their mettle to compose a bill of rights which
So the Bill of Rights contains eight Amendments stipulation rights which were noncontroversial, and which very little opposition could be raised against them. The listed (“enumerated”) rights refer to the kinds of abuses historical tyrants had committed. That still left all manner of traditional rights - like raising your own children, etc - which were not enumerated. Those, the Federalists covered by
- would satisfy the demands of the Antifederalists,
- would satisfy their own objections that listing some rights would inevitably leave other rights unmentioned and, in principle, denigrated. And,
- would actually be ratified. The Federalists couldn’t afford to be seen to be putting poison pills in the proposed amendments which would prevent the actual adoption of the amendments.
The right to sue for libel is an unenumerated right. And the right to prosecute pornography is, as well.
- Amendment 9
- The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
- Amendment 10
- The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
If 1A has simply said, “freedom of the press,” that would be the meaning that people ignorantly assume. But instead 1A refers to the freedom of the press - that is, freedom of the press within understood limits recognized before the adoption of the Constitution. Scalia explains
But in Times v. Sullivan, Scalia said the Supreme Court, under Justice Earl Warren, “… simply decided, ‘Yes, it used to be that … George Washington could sue somebody that libeled him, but we don’t think that’s a good idea anymore.’”It is time, and past time, for the Republicans to consign the Times v. Sullivan decision to the nether regions, and sue the journalism cartel for libel - and for antitrust violations.JUSTICE SCALIA: THE 45 WORDS — AND ORIGINAL MEANING — OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.