Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breonna Taylor Settlement: What it means for No-knock Warrants
Gun Watch ^ | 22 September, 2020 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 09/22/2020 5:17:21 AM PDT by marktwain


image from flickr.com U.S. Army Material Command John B. Snyder, Watervliet Arsenal, N.Y.   CC 2.0  12 January, 2012.


In Louisville, Kentucky, the City has reached a settlement in the wrongful death lawsuit rising from the no-knock raid on Breonna Taylor's apartment. Breonna's boyfriend thought the raid was a home invasion.  An exchange of gunfire through the door resulted in Breonna being killed on 13 March of this year. 

(edit) the shots which killed Breonna were fired inside the apartment. Only one shot was fired by Breonna's boyfriend. Several shots were fired from outside the apartment to inside, but did not hit anyone)

The City will pay 12 million dollars and require reforms of police procedure. 

Promiscuous use of no-knock warrants is incompatible with a legally armed society and the Second Amendment.

Louisville has  mandated the use of body cameras in police raids, in response to Breonna's death. 

8.1.18 ENTRY PROCEDURES All members of the search team will wear body armor and will be equipped with a Wearable Video System (WVS). Pursuant to Louisville Metro Code of Ordinances (LMCO) 39.069, no later than five (5) minutes prior to all search warrant executions, members will activate their WVS in recording mode and will not deactivate their WVS any sooner than five (5) minutes following the completion of the execution of the warrant (i.e. once all occupants are secured and the scene has been declared safe).

More search warrant reforms were required of the Louisville police.  From the News Release from louisvilleky.gov:

Search Warrant Reforms

The settlement includes reforms on involving the police in local communities and to insure greater accountability for forfeiture of currency, drug testing, and accountability for misconduct by police officers. 

Section 8.1 of Louisville police procedures has been revised twice in recent months. It requires copies of warrants be provided at the beginning of a warrant service, and inventories of items seized left at the end of the search. Damages which occurred to property during service are to be photographed and documented. These have been common practices for a long period of time, and may already have been in effect in Louisville. Section 8.1 contains a requirement for at least one uniformed officer and one marked car at warrant service.

The  12 million dollar payment in the Louisville settlement should make cities and police departments across the country pay attention to no-knock warrants and the potential for bad outcomes. 

The family of the Houston couple who were killed in a no knock raid last year, where police lied to obtain the warrant, and where several police face felony charges, have not reached a settlement yet. Both cases have received national attention. 

Mayors, city council members, and police chiefs are not personally accountable for the funds. Taxpayers will pick up the tab.

Senator Rand Paul has proposed a federal ban on no-knock raids. From congress.gov:

This Act may be cited as the “Justice for Breonna Taylor Act”.

SEC. 2. Prohibition on no-knock warrants.

(b) State and local law enforcement agencies.—Beginning in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, and each fiscal year thereafter, a State or local law enforcement agency that receive funds from the Department of Justice during the fiscal year may not execute a warrant that does not require the law enforcement officer serving the warrant to provide notice of his or her authority and purpose before forcibly entering a premises.

It is the bare skeleton of a law. It is not serious legislation. Some form of no-knock warrant has been in effect since the nation's founding. There needs, at minimum, to be definitions of what "provide notice" means in this context. There needs to be exceptions for the rare circumstances when a no-knock raid is reasonably justified. No-knock raids need to be rare, as they used to be, not completely banned.

For his championship of eliminating no-knock raids, Senator Paul was vilified and threatened by an angry mob as he and a few others walked from the White House to their hotel. From heartlanddailynews.com:

As Paul explained, “They were shouting threats to us, to kill us, to hurt us, but also threats saying shout, shouting ‘say her name,’ Breonna Taylor, and it’s like you couldn’t reason with this mob, but I’m actually the author of the Breonna Taylor law to end no-knock raids, so the irony is lost on these idiots that they’re trying to kill the person who’s actually trying to get rid of no-knock raids.”

Paul added, “I truly believe this with every fiber of my being, had they gotten at us they would have gotten us to the ground, we might not have been killed, might just have been injured by being kicked in the head, or kicked in the stomach until we were senseless.”

The riots and destruction of property across the nation are the exact opposite of a return to the rule of law which Ron Paul champions.

The widespread use of digital recording devices will accelerate the risk of no-knock raids for cities and police administrators. Police agencies have lost much of the ability to cover up and paper over problems and corruption.

The reforms forced on Louisville and Houston police departments set examples for pro-active departments. Departments which do not reform will face greater scrutiny if and when no-knock warrants are involved in future tragedies. No-knock warrants may start to go out of style, as they came into style. 

The current Antifa/BLM mob tactics to de-legitimize and defund the police have the opposite effect. The more police are de-legitimized, the less likely they are to adopt no-knock reforms.

Senator Rand Paul was credibly threatened, even though he has been the foremost champion of no-knock raid reform legislation in Congress. 

If the mob had a clue, they would have praised Paul for his strong support of the very law they want passed. However, the throng of imbeciles who tried to do harm to Paul have little knowledge about such things. They are, in general, all about sowing chaos and division—not solutions and unity.

No-knock warrants are likely to be reduced and restricted. They will not be completely outlawed. Reforms which mandate strict requirements for the issuance of no knock warrants are the most likely outcome, on a city by city basis.

©2020 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; breonna; noknock; settlement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
No-knock warrants are being issued promiscuously in some locations, far more than is necessary.

The use of no-knock warrants should be severely curtailed. It is incompatible with the Second Amendment.

1 posted on 09/22/2020 5:17:21 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Even if they are useful in some situations, the abuse of these shows that police can’t be trusted with them.


2 posted on 09/22/2020 5:20:21 AM PDT by Fido969 (In)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Her drug dealing boyfriend shouldn’t have been hiding his money in her place and then talking about it over prison telephones.


3 posted on 09/22/2020 5:23:19 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

We have seen too many mistakes with no-knock warrants.

They serve no useful purpose.


4 posted on 09/22/2020 5:30:39 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party is communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle
Her drug dealing boyfriend shouldn’t have been hiding his money in her place and then talking about it over prison telephones.

What does that have to do with no-knock warrants?

5 posted on 09/22/2020 5:33:48 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: struggle

From what my kids that live over there say, there is a lot more to the story. They didn’t have the wrong apartment for one


6 posted on 09/22/2020 5:35:11 AM PDT by southernindymom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

“Even if they are useful in some situations, the abuse of these shows that police can’t be trusted with them.”

One “mistake” is too many.


7 posted on 09/22/2020 5:36:06 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie (Wht then small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“Mayors, city council members, and police chiefs are not personally accountable for the funds. Taxpayers will pick up the tab.”

While the mayors, city council members, police chiefs and the 10-12 officers kicking in the door probably couldn’t personally scrape up the financial settlements awarded in these cases...it wouldn’t take too many cases where these folks ARE required to pay those settlements...to stop no-knock raids.


8 posted on 09/22/2020 5:37:16 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
While the police had obtained a No-knock warrant in this case, they did not rely on it. The police did knock, and did identify themselves as police before entering. A witness in the apartment complex confirms this.

This entire article begins with a false premise.

9 posted on 09/22/2020 5:43:17 AM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It’s too easy for no-knock raids to end in tragedy like this one. Of course the people inside think it’s a home invasion and may start to shoot and the police shoot back. (Of course, it could happen the other way around too.) And for what? A few drugs.


10 posted on 09/22/2020 5:47:18 AM PDT by libertylover (Election 2020: Make America Great Again or Burn it to the Ground. Choose one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernindymom

THE REPORT:

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/63943132/breonna-taylor-summary-redacted1

PASS IT ON ...


11 posted on 09/22/2020 5:49:33 AM PDT by Patriot_MP (Of the Troops, For the Troops - US of A Always. Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The police did announce who they were — they stated it before they knocked down the door... this is a useful event for the left - so certain details were LEFT out of the article....


12 posted on 09/22/2020 5:50:49 AM PDT by Patriot_MP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
' Some form of no-knock warrant has been in effect since the nation's founding.'

That goes against common law and defeated the point of having a 4th amendment. Any link to the claim of a no knock history at the time of the founding. Knock and announce has/was always the given in our history.

13 posted on 09/22/2020 5:55:58 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot_MP

Says the police? You trust .gov? They also said they didn’t have body cams. That was a lie, they did. Other citizens said they didn’t announce.


14 posted on 09/22/2020 5:57:56 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: moovova

virtually anyone who has a gun who gets startled in the middle of the night will respond with pulling a weapon. I can’t imagine why this was ever an option for law enforcement. Hopefully this will rid everyone of this over reach. guilty or not this just seems unconstitutional to me.


15 posted on 09/22/2020 6:01:50 AM PDT by russdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
(1) No-knock warrants should be strictly limited

(2) The officers should NOT be prosecuted, since the boyfriend initiated a firefight, and they returned fire.

(3) The REAL TRUTH of who "EMS worker" Ms. Taylor was and her criminal activities for a major drug dealer and murderer is NOT being told to the public.

16 posted on 09/22/2020 6:15:26 AM PDT by montag813 (Nonsenze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

For a White killed in a raid there would not be any riots, and the settlement would be $10,000 5 years later.


17 posted on 09/22/2020 6:34:25 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Journalists Take Bits of Reality and Slot them into the Existing Script. -Friedman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

>What does that have to do with no-knock warrants?

They knocked and announced


18 posted on 09/22/2020 6:42:53 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Louisville paid the Danegeld.

But the Danes aren’t leaving.


19 posted on 09/22/2020 6:51:07 AM PDT by Old Sarge (We are seeing the birth of the Socialist Putsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Police “announcing themselves” means nothing if they are at the wrong house breaking down the door. While the owner believes they have no reason to be there.

Criminals often will yell “police” during home invasions to get people’s guard down.

The standard for even a “knock” warrant needs to be MUCH higher since the wrong house in a 2A state is very likely to get someone random killed.

EVERY step of the warrant process must be recorded and reviewed along the way. There must be greater oversight and very serious consequences for botched raids. Murder charges and seizure of all assets for any police/judges that did not follow procedure. Followed by the death penalty


20 posted on 09/22/2020 6:54:42 AM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson