Posted on 08/02/2021 8:53:47 AM PDT by JV3MRC
A close associate of liberal billionaire George Soros has found himself in hot water. Six women have accused former Soros money manager Howard Rubin of taking kinky hobbies too far.
The Daily Mail reported that Rubin, “is being accused by six women of beating them during sadomasochistic sex sessions at a specially constructed 'sex dungeon' in his Manhattan apartment.” The “right-hand man” of Soros, was “blamed for incurring $377 million of losses at Merrill Lynch in 1987,” is now being “accused of paying women up to $5,000 in order to take part in BDSM sex,” the Daily Mail said. Several of the women have accused Rubin of abuse, “ignoring safe words, going beyond the BDSM boundaries and agreements they set before sex, and physically hurt[ing] them.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Sounds like they deserve each other.
Should be a nearly impossible case to prove, since it’s a “he said/she said”, and any physical evidence can’t be proven to not be the result of the activities the plaintiffs already conceded that they consented to.
Of course that’s how it should be... but we live in a post-Cosby world where if you just get enough accusers you can “prove” anything, absent any evidence at all.
They want more.
So many powerful elites with their sex dungeons and pseudo rape rooms.
Ed buck was sick enough to video his rape play sadist attacks on people he incapacitated.
Eyes Wide Shut is a documentary.
Such degeneracy goes back to the days of Benjamin Franklin
Ironic how some movies are more accurate as reality.
Godfather III seems pretty close to financial affairs by the Vatican financiers.
I'm sick of my gender screaming every time they experience something vile that was self induced to begin with.
Women that Weinstein molested were with him voluntarily. What did they expect when they were 'invited' into him home at 1:00AM? "Oh, I thought I would be 'reading' for him" comes their reply through their crocodile tears. Or Bill Cosby...a prolific (according to all accounts) sexual assaulter.
No one ever points out that almost 100% of the 'victims' were with the perpetrator of their own free-will. And their is no way, imho, that victims didn't 'hear' about them prior to being with them.
Planned Parenthood was caught on tape teaching teenage minors about BDSM, rape fantasy, and “safe words” thus teaching young girls “no doesn’t always mean NO”.
Evil has gone unabated in America for decades and we are living with the results. Unconstrained sexuality and depravity destroys nations.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3200158/posts
Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives
Frontpagemag.com ^ | 9-2-2014 | Mallory Millett
During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, “Why?” She answered, “That means you’ll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!”
What a giggle we girls had over that. “How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are,” we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.
Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, “Come to New York. We’re making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it.”
I hadn’t seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, “Sexual Politics.”
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.
To me, this sounded silly. I was enduring culture shock after having been cut-off from my homeland, living in Third-World countries for years with not one trip back to the United States. I was one of those people who, upon returning to American soil, fell out of the plane blubbering with ecstasy at being home in the USA. I knelt on the ground covering it with kisses. I had learned just exactly how delicious was the land of my birth and didn’t care what anyone thought because they just hadn’t seen what I had or been where I had been. I had seen factory workers and sex-slaves chained to walls.
How could they know? Asia is beyond our ken and, as they say, utterly inscrutable, and a kind of hell I never intended to revisit. I lived there, not junketed, not visited like sweet little tourists — I’d conducted households and tried to raise a child. I had outgrown the communism of my university days and was clumsily groping my way back to God.
How could twelve American women who were the most respectable types imaginable — clean and privileged graduates of esteemed institutions: Columbia, Radcliffe, Smith, Wellesley, Vassar; the uncle of one was Secretary of War under Franklin Roosevelt — plot such a thing? Most had advanced degrees and appeared cogent, bright, reasonable and good. How did these people rationally believe they could succeed with such vicious grandiosity? And why?
I dismissed it as academic-lounge air-castle-building. I continued with my new life in New York while my sister became famous publishing her books, featured on the cover of “Time Magazine.” “Time” called her “the Karl Marx of the Women’s Movement.” This was because her book laid out a course in Marxism 101 for women. Her thesis: The family is a den of slavery with the man as the Bourgeoisie and the woman and children as the Proletariat. The only hope for women’s “liberation” (communism’s favorite word for leading minions into inextricable slavery; “liberation,” and much like “collective” – please run from it, run for your life) was this new “Women’s Movement.” Her books captivated the academic classes and soon “Women’s Studies” courses were installed in colleges in a steady wave across the nation with Kate Millett books as required reading.
Imagine this: a girl of seventeen or eighteen at the kitchen table with Mom studying the syllabus for her first year of college and there’s a class called “Women’s Studies.” “Hmmm, this could be interesting,” says Mom. “Maybe you could get something out of this.”...
Yeah, right? “After being payed to be bound in a dungeon and get the freak on with a grizzled old coot, I am appalled by his manners and dare I say boorish behavior!”
The complaints of dirty whores ring hollow.
Yes, I remember reading this a few weeks ago. All the militant witches, who had “issues” with men i.e. daddy issues, couldn’t get a date issues, authority issues etc etc are the women who destroyed our traditional family culture. They had (have) mental issues and it has spread like a cancer. We are seeing a collective ‘madness’ and I believe the end of America.
Kate Millet was the author of Sexual Politics (in the 1960s) and the founder of NOW. She was certifiably mental, urged revolutionary overthrow of the status quo, and promoted relations between adult women and minor girls (it is covered in her Wikipedia profile). The account I posted came from her sister Mallory.
Back in the 80s I went to one of these 'group' meetings believing it was going to be about domestic abuse i.e. husbands beating their wives and how to become involved in 'helping' women in the situation (I was from such a marriage). Anyway, it turned into a white male bashing session. Nothing about domestic violence. That pretty well quelched any other 'group' meetings with females for me.
Most Americans didn't even know about this type of activity back then and if they did, they, me included, thought that there were so few in number, it would just 'go away' at some point.
There is also domestic abuse in relationships between two women (or two men) and this doesn’t get the same “movie of the week” treatment.
These are admitted prostitutes saying that the guy didn't abide by the deal, not innocents kidnapped for debauchery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.