Posted on 01/10/2022 3:42:49 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
As a kid growing up, I would watch as my parents watched Walter Cronkite on CBS Evening News, and listen to his calm, steady and measured cadence when reading the news. Cronkite was a welcomed and reassuring figure during times of war, presidential assassinations and other crisis. They called him the ‘most trusted man in America’, but there’s more to that story. Walter Cronkite was also a One World Government globalist who desired to be under the yoke of the United Nations and…well, in his own words when he said, “join me, I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan”. But don’t take my word for it, watch the video at the bottom of this article and see it for yourself.
“He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers’ fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.” Daniel 11:24 (KJB)
The world we see exploding into chaos at Day 666 of 15 Days To Flatten The Curve, didn’t come into bloom over the past two years only, the seeds that were planted to bring about this bitter fruit took place in the immediate aftermath of WWII. The Bilderbergers, George Soros, David Rockefeller, Bill Gates Sr, and yes, Anthony Fauci, have all been planting in this garden for many decades. The events of the past 666 days are intentional, carefully planned and prepared offerings to the one who is soon to come on the scene.
Walter Cronkite knew who this man is, and he did his part to prepare the world to receive him.
One World Government Walter Cronkite: ‘I’m glad to sit at the right hand of Satan’ On October 19, 1999, Walter Cronkite accepted the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award from the World Federalists Association at a ceremony at the United Nations in what WND reported as a “total media blackout”.
In his speech, Cronkite declared his support and allegiance to a one-world government. He blamed the refusal of the U.S. Congress to ratify one-world-government treaties on “a handful” of obdurate senators who “pander” to the Christian Coalition and the “religious right wing”.
Identifying Pat Robertson as the leader of the Christian Coalition, Cronkite quoted Robertson, that “any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the Devil.” Cronkite then mocked Robertson by declaring, “I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan.”
Introduced by a speaker declaring that a one “world government is the structure necessary for global justice,” Cronkite said:
I’M IN A POSITION TO SPEAK MY MIND AND, BY GOD, I’M GOING TO DO IT. (AUDIENCE LAUGH UPROARIOUSLY) FIRST, WE AMERICANS ARE GOING TO HAVE TO YIELD UP SOME OF OUR SOVEREIGNTY. THAT’S GOING TO BE FOR MANY A BITTER PILL.
Today, we must develop federal structures on a global level to deal with world problems. We need a system of enforceable world law, a democratic federal world government. Most important, we should sign and ratify the treaty for a permanent international criminal court. That is now at the core of the world federalist movement’s drive. That court will enable the world to hold individuals accountable for their crimes against humanity.
And the third point: Just consider if you will, after 55 years, the possibility of a more representative and democratic system of decision-making at the UN. This should include both revision of the veto in the Security Council and adoption of a weighted voting system in the General Assembly. Some of you may ask, although I think most of you know the answer, why the Senate is not ratifying these important treaties, and why the Congress is not even paying UN dues, even as with the American rejection, so many years now, the League of Nations after World War I.
Our failure to live up to our obligations to the United Nations is led by a handful of willful senators who choose to pursue their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our nation’s conscience. They pander to and are supported by the Christian Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing. Their leader, Pat Robertson, has written in a book a few years ago that we should have a world government but only when the Messiah arrives. (Derisive laughs from the audience.) He (Robertson) wrote, “Any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the devil.”
Well, join me. I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan. (Audience applause)
Obama pined for the days when all Americans received their news from the same three channels reporting the same stories; what a bizarre thing to admit publicly.
I remember his nick name being Walter C0ckbite.
When spent several days in Saigon before going up country he was extensively breifed by Westmoreland, Rosson, and Mike Davison, MACV G2. While I never particular larly liked Cronkite he was no patsy and seen a good bit of WW2 in western Europe. He made several critical remarks on US complacency as before Bulge but said the enemy had been been administered a crushing defeat. In Hue the same thing. Marine officer’s breifed him and C didn’t buy the holding the lily and called it a ‘close thing’ and once again US artillery and air dominance secured the victory but there was no doubt the enemy was throughly beaten. So who pulled his chai and told him ty ditch the ‘tpugh fight and not without significant US errors but a solid defeat of the enemy’ and replace it with ‘the is in a stalemate with no way out’. People at the top of CBS who to topple LBJ and bring the war to end as a defeat is my quess.
“Yep. He helped keep the war going. Ho Chi Minh and General Giap were discussing how to salvage the Tet disaster with a peace treaty. Then they turned on the Evening News and saw Croonkite. They knew then that they would win because of the USA’s traitorous media.“
Yes this is factual.
North Vietnam may very well have folded had Cronkite not spouted his garbage.
+1
That was the deep state propaganda. The Military set the communists back by about 4 years. It was about 1972 when the commies started gaining enough people and equipment for a big fight again. There were about 17 commies killed for each American. TET backfired big time on the commies. The war was being won but riots at home and Crinkite convinced LBJ to pull out
I believe the problem was that Americans had been led to believe that such an attack by the VC was impossible because we’d licked them so badly; the images of the embassy being attacked supposedly hit hard.
I’d think I’d been lied to as well if I watched the news from 1965 through 1968 and saw that; the inflated body counts and lack of real progress came home to roost with the Tet Offensive. If nothing else, it was clear that the ARVN couldn’t defend South Vietnam without massive US intervention/boots on the ground.
1972 was a different matter altogether, as it pitted conventional North Vietnamese forces against the ARVN with heavy US air support but no boots on the ground. While it was rebuffed, it did leave North Vietnam holding about a tenth of South Vietnam - and we agreed to leave them there as we signed our peace treaty. Thieu was furious, and understandably claimed the US had betrayed South Vietnam; I guess he just didn’t understand that political changes in the US would doom his country.
More grist for the end times fear porn mill.
The news media relayed the military line that we were winning, and the enemy was on the ropes; the Tet Offensive shouldn’t have been possible. The enemy from Tet (the VC) never really recovered; in 1972 and 1975 it was the North Vietnamese Army, not South Vietnamese communists, who fought against the ARVN. The VC were reduced to support roles.
This damn auto correct changes words constantly. I apologise for the crap garbled product. It is particularly bad about military events The people building. the algorithm clearly don’t know anything about the military
As dad said.
South Vietnam had plenty of communists; they were armed by Red China and North Vietnam, had their own units (and flag), and attacked within South Vietnam. The North Vietnam Army itself wore their own uniforms/helmets, and generally attacked from outside South Vietnam (crossing borders to do so).
Our response to Tet left the former in tatters (as the popular uprising they hoped would generate mass support for them failed to materialize), leaving the only hope for victory/unification in the hands of “foreign” (North Vietnamese) troops. That is why in 1972 and 1975 the enemy wasn’t wearing black pajamas, but NVA uniforms - and they rode in tanks.
Walter Cronkite was a member of Bohemian Grove and the voice of the owl. This is one weird group and I believe it is Satanic.
Well, he knows the truth now.
Hope he likes it as he’s set for eternity with it now.
The Tet Offensive had almost completely wiped out the Vietcong soldiers...
I agree, and have been stressing that point; it turned the war into a conventional one between North and South Vietnam (rather than a communist South Vietnamese insurgency supplied by North Vietnam and Red China). I pointed out that they never recovered, playing little role in the events of 1972 or 1975.
The press was staying in Saigon with plenty of booze and hookers. The vast majority of the press simply rewrote Army press releases and sent them on. After Tet they realized that the Army was leading them on and they turned on the Army.
No one is innocent in the Vietnam debacle, except those of us who put our boots on the ground.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.