Think it’s time to fight for real yet?
His return is coming soon!
It’s a 100% bad.
And it seems pretty predictable to me that if any supporter of a non-Democrat cause were to gather in Washington for some demonstration, then that “insurrectionist” would have all of their correspondence immediately laid bare and published in an unflattering light.
But, on the other hand, if some proper court were to request details of the communications of, say, Hunter Biden ... well, [shrug] ... sadly, those items seem to have been misplaced. Nowhere to be found.
Facebook already scans every private message.
Let me guess. The justification to spy is CP and terrorism.
NOPE.
Not allowed.
Has Linda Graham responded yet about when Trump called him out for being a RINO?
The concept of private communications has been greatly exaggerated.
I am glad that the Electronic Frontier Foundation is publicizing this.
I am counting on Senator Rand Paul to stop it.
Violating the First Amendment by letting private business do the dirty work. Not the first time, of course. As far as I am concerned, every effort to erode the First Amendment is another step toward voiding the contract between the government and the people. (Do you think "they" are reading this message? Let them. Live Free or Die!)
Lindsay:::::knucklehead
This theoretically attacks child sexual abuse and Internet porn using children…it’s like when people used to take their photos to be developed and the store could report them if the photos showed child abuse.
I know people who have worked in the investigation of cybercrimes against minors - which ranges from grooming to sending dick pix to torture and snuff pictures - and the reach of this is horrifying.
So in theory this is not a bad thing. But the problem is that once you give the government the power to do this, it never stops there.
In fact, it never even stops at crime, and becomes political at once and then the state can legally pursue its enemies - who have nothing to do with child abuse.
I’d say a big thumbs down. It’s like the “War on Terror” and the TSA, which theoretically were supposed to protect us from attacks by Muslim terrorists but immediately turned into domestic surveillance of political enemies and now, with the TSA, into enforcement of unconstitutional government “mandates.”
So I’d say it’s a no, regardless of how well intentioned.
But it will keep us safe from the terrorists! You don’t want the terrorists to WIN, do you? /s
Sounds like they just want to let the NSA program doing this come out into the open.
Something like this just might, oh i dunno, getting somebody injected with a high speed piece of metal?
Blue Menthol knows the law. He knows that it is illegal for the government to surveil messages, and JUST AS ILLEGAL for the government to pay a “private company” to do it.
The government can’t say that it doesn’t snoop in your checking account when it mandates that the banks snoop and report what the government tells it to report.
The government does not have the right to do this, but that won’t stop it - it never has. Think ECHELON.
But it’s all to keep us safe, so it must be good. Right? (s)
One would think they almost don’t trust the citizenry. Weird huh. And I see linda “shoot ‘em you got guns’ graham is right up in it. What’s the matter linda, constituents starting to get fed up with you? Finally?
“Re-introduce” legislation? Heck it’s been in practice illegally for years