Posted on 02/07/2022 5:19:40 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
WASHINGTON — A little over a week ago, The Liberty Loft reported on the shocking data presented by attorney Thomas Renz at Senator Ron Johnson’s (R-Wisconsin) panel discussion titled COVID-19: A Second Opinion.
Among the numbers were a 1,000% rise in neurological issues and 300% increases in cancer cases and miscarriages from the five-year average ever since the COVID-19 jabs have been used in the military.
The numbers came from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) while three whistleblower doctors from the Department of Defense (DOD) provided the info the Renz.
Now, allegations are emerging that the DOD is wiping data from the system to cover up this alarming rise.
Johnson sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin in which he gave Senate whistleblower protection to the DOD doctors writing: “Any retaliatory actions taken against these individuals will not be tolerated and will be investigated immediately.”
“Renz also informed me that some DMED data showing registered diagnoses of myocarditis had been removed from the database,” Johnson wrote. “Following the allegation that DMED data had been doctored, I immediately wrote to you on January 24 requesting that you preserve all records referring, relating, or reported to DMED. I have yet to hear whether you have complied with this request.”
Johnson asked for information on the DOD’s knowledge of the rise in medical conditions that are linked to “vaccine” injuries and their actions to investigate the rise, and he asked if myocarditis information has been removed from the DMED database and, if so, why and by whom.
Beyond the myocarditis data, Dr. Robert Malone said the DOD’s “data management is going in and actively deleting cases, manipulating the database.”
The reason such a cover up may be taking place is clear, according to Steve Kirsch.
(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertyloft.com ...
The vaccines weren't available to military age Americans until May yet the reports are based on the first 10 months of the year. If vaccine related the increases should only be seen in the last 6 months.
Why would they compare year-over-year when there were no vaccines in the first 4 months of 2021?
We've given over half a billion Covid vaccine shots in the US. Why aren't we seeing this rise in cancer, birth defects, hypertension, infertility, etc. in the general population?
Look! A troll!
Well hi there, been a while!
Like clockwork!
Yeah... these guys are no bueno.
“Why aren’t we seeing this rise...?”
We are not seeing it because reporting a relation of any illness connected to the vaxxine is discouraged by the government controlled medical community.
First hand knowledge.
Pretty quick to attack us. Nice!
Who is "us"?
Feeling the victim?
Oh, right. I forgot.
The Conspiracy.
Did you ignore my last comment or are you just really really stupid.
No. You claimed the “government controlled medical community” was discouraging reporting of a 3X to 50X increase in disease, infertility and birth defects in the general population.
I think that’s a paranoid conspiracy fantasy.
Sorry.
3X to 50X is right in line with the lack of reporting to VAERS according to studies by Harvard.
Reporting or acknowledging any relation of the Vaxxine to any illness is officially discouraged in Oregon.
That is first hand knowledge.
You have been fooled and no one can convince you otherwise.
How many VAERS reports get verified?
But we’re not talking about VAERS. We’re talking about infertility, birth defects, cancers, etc. These are all things that are monitored by multiple organizations having nothing to do with vaccines.
Huge increases in these conditions in the general population would be noticed regardless of the cause.
All of the deaths are. I don't know about the others.
“All of the deaths are. I don’t know about the others.”
VAERS includes mandatory reporting by medical personnel of serious events that occur within a certain time frame. And they are encouraged to report others even when it’s not clear the vaccine had a connection.
But VAERS also contains self-reports by people with no medical knowledge at all. It invites these reports:
“(VAERS) is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences. Anyone can submit a report to VAERS, including parents and patients.”
I have a friend who manages a VAERS program for Africa. Some of the self reporting there can be pretty entertaining. VAERS and its twins around the world are looking for patterns to identify possible real problems. Statistics. The fact that the self-reporting isn’t verified isn’t a big concern for their purposes, but it’s not hard data like some want to pretend it is.
It's the single most misrepresented data source in this debate. And usually misrepresented by people who know better.
“It’s the single most misrepresented data source in this debate. And usually misrepresented by people who know better.”
Some surely know but they aren’t about to tell their followers. That would put an end to their little game of treating VAERS data like it’s hard evidence of actual problems. Keeping the grift alive depends on fear porn, and misrepresenting VAERS serves that end well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.