Posted on 06/03/2022 7:59:28 AM PDT by Starman417
I told my wife that I was going to write an article about getting rid of all guns. She looked at me, rolled her eyes and said, "You're just going to be sarcastic!" I told her, "You know I am." The Second Amendment of the Constitution seems pretty clear the topic of gun ownership: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." However, I am a reasonable man and would consider getting rid of all guns under certain conditions.
Condition 1: Someone must take the nuclear codes away from Biden. Seriously, "Darth" Biden is suddenly concerned about gun violence and yet he has the means to accidentally nuke North Korea into oblivion with the push of a button. Apparently, no one sees a problem with a senile, cognitively impaired, octogenarian (80 this November) with anger issues wandering around a fake Oval Office. Biden reads instructions from a teleprompter the size of an aircraft carrier, sincerely believes that 81 million people voted for him in 2020 and yells profanity at his staff because his poll numbers are lower than whale sh*t at the bottom of the ocean. What is wrong with that dude?
Condition 2: All of the bad guys must give up their guns. Seriously, bad guys are gunning down people at a rapid pace. Over Memorial Day weekend (2022) 51 people were shot and 9 were killed in the city of Chicago alone. (crickets from the lamestream media) Chicago's new motto is: "Come to Chicago for the pizza. Stay because you were murdered!"
We used to rely on the police to protect us but unbridled crime is outpacing even their heroic efforts. Unfortunately, our thin blue line of defenders is getting even thinner. The police have been defunded, demoralized, defamed, humiliated, and killed in the line of duty. Who you gonna call when the police are gone? As long as the bad guys have Uzis, a lust to kill and nothing to lose, citizens must step up and do whatever is needed to protect their own families.
Condition 3: Politicians must give up their guns. It doesn't seem fair that politicians in Washington DC demand that we give up our weapons and yet they are protected by guns and exempt themselves from the laws that they pass. They consider their lives valuable and some live in gated communities protected by armed security guards. They construct barricades around the Capital, hide themselves behind concertina wire and then throw rocks at us peons for legally owning guns to protect our loved ones. They are hypocrites.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
When are they gonna go after “assault cars” and “vehicles of war” like hummers? If we just had sensible vehicle laws, folks wouldn’t die, so let’s ban all vehicles, just to be sure.
No! I will keep my guns and my Hummer, thank you.
So like, there has been a liberal assault on the 2nd Amendment for at least 40 or 50 years, did some people just wake up to it?
Agreed.
Common scents? Like branDUNs grampers? 💩
Hey let’s get rid of radical leftists.
Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, and Commies in general SHOULD get rid of their guns.
After all, they are mentally ill!
Hollywood’s been noticeably silent this time around.
Wasn’t there an event recently that cause all the “stars” to buy guns ?
My cat has induced from empirical data and newspaper headlines at paw, that if Democrats pass a feline declaw law, they will kill her kittens first then her, in that order. But under the declaw law, all the Democrats will be allowed to have cats who have all their teeth and claws intact. My cat ain`t stupoiud. My cat told me she would attack, claw, bite, and defur all the Democrats in a pre-emptive strike. She ain`t stupoid. She just told me this after I served her breakfast. by her window. She can read too. I taught her. My cat is unafraid of racoons and coyotes, much less DemoRats.
It started in earnest in 1934.
When politicians defund police departments, then citizens must step up and do whatever is needed to protect their own families. What ever is needed.
Screw the disarm types.
I have tried for decades to point out to non-believers that the benefits of firearm ownership outweigh the risks. But the overly emotional and unimaginative sheeple who comprise the bulk of the Rat/Rino crowd are not going to understand this until their candy-arses are in a sling.
The article is good food for thought, but I would also condition a ban on the assurance that a sane gun owner could never flip out and go berserk with a rod. And that is also impossible to ensure.
A curious thing - we don’t have a militia anymore. That would appear to be a right that we’re not allowed to exercise? Or at least be taken seriously.
And National Guard isn’t ‘the militia’.
Ping
In fairness, if you stay in Chicago because you were murdered, you do get to vote (straight Democrat ticket) for the rest of time.
right of self defense is a natural right
so yes it is absolute
FJB
So only street gangs and cops can have them.
I believe Commierado is going after vehicles of war by denying licences for all surplus military vehicles like those used by reenactors. I think their claim is to suppress “white supremisists “. Owners would have to tailor their surplus jeeps instead of driving them. Idiots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.