Posted on 09/15/2022 2:26:36 AM PDT by iontheball
Ever since I wrote the substack article on human augmentation and the UK Ministry of Defence and the German Military Complex , discussing that these two organizations advocate for human augmentation in a report entitled "Human Augmentation – The Dawn of a New Paradigm", I have been wondering if the US government, that is to say the US Department of Defense (DoD) and the Administrative State which controls it, has developed similar plans.
This week I did a little research starting with the key words - “human augmentation” and “DoD” and there “it” is. The “it” being the strategy playbook and battlefield field plan for creating human cyborgs…
(Excerpt) Read more at rwmalonemd.substack.com ...
Not a new concept at all, not a good idea either. The vaxx is change of human dna and rna. Where that takes us is unknown.
Because, if it can be done, some scientist somewhere in the world is going to do it.
That's just human nature.
Read later.
We’ve been creating cyborgs for decades, artificial joints,heart valves ,artificial limbs.🤔
He/We are behind. The time for conversation has passed. There were attempts, but we seemed to be so invested in rabbit holes that nobody paid attention. Cyborg/transhumanism already had its own sub-culture. Artificial wombs and the first virgin birth in a mammal have been accessable for 6-7 years. Read ‘Re-Genesis: How synthetic biology
will reinvent nature and ourselves’ which came out in 2014 and active, again, for about 6-7 years.
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/transhuman-biohacker-implanted-magnets
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216961/
As it happens, they are the same people who have, for over 100 years, benefited immensely from the destruction done to the same natural environment they now claim to protect.
Apparently they only thing they’re really good at is.....hypocrisy.
If someone came up with artificial vision for the blind (like Jordy in Star Trek) would we prohibit it or embrace it?
If someone came up with a natural looking artificial hand for people who had lost a limb (like Luke in Star Wars) would prohibit it or embrace it?
Obviously we would embrace it.
The question becomes: would we allow the replacement of healthy body parts with artificial ones to "upgrade" them? Sight, hearing, smell. We'll be able to significantly improve them with implants in the future. But should we?
As far as "But should we?"... Yes, we will.
Human cyborgs vs. Boston Dynamics robot dogs...
or with?
We’ve been creating cyborgs for decades, artificial joints,heart valves ,artificial limbs.🤔
____________________________________
Yes, but there is a difference between devices to restore bodily function as it was created, and on the other hand, fundamentally changing the body into a different version of God’s creation - part man and part sentient AI. Ask yourself will the soul remain in such a being or will it depart? Of course, the engineers must be atheists so they could care less. Just look at what they have already accomplished with the vax experiment. What could go wrong with this venture?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-life-expectancy-falls-again-in-historic-decline_4732330.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily
Partly metal,partly real.🤨
There is a difference between restoration and enhancement.
I think it is ok to create ways to restore humans physically, so they can enjoy full lives.
Otherwise, the most we should be doing is creating the best environments for people to be their natural best.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.