Prosecutors seeking to deny the accused of their defenses is the hallmark of justice, don’tcha-know.
To date, the FBI is still not being honest about this. Wait until a jury hears that their were HUNDREDS of government agents involved stirring things up.
If Fed Agents were present, how is it NOT relevant?
Then again... expecting logic from a Leftist is a long wait to no end.
Withheld evidence is cause for appeal. There will be a long list of such reasons.
“ …the defense has attempted to inject into this case partisan political attacks and irrelevant and prejudicial issues …” Jack Smith’s 20-page filing said.”
You cannot make this stuff up. We are living in the Twilight Zone.
Heavens to Betsy that President Trump be allowed to make his case in front of a jury! Jury nullification is only for black defendants.
-PJ
This seems contradictory. Either it is irrelevant, or is a lie. If it is a lie, than I don't think it is irrelevant. It's just untrue. If it is irrelevant, does that not imply that it is true? Nevertheless, an accused man should be given every latitude to defend himself. Smith seems eager to stifle any defense from Trump. Doesn't seem like the actions of a prosecutor who has such 'sprawling evidence' against President Trump.
It’s already gone as it will be found he’s illegally appointed; he’s twisting in the wind.
He has already tried to prevent Trump from defending himself in the public forum. No he was evidence that the government he represents was directly involved in and instigated much of the actions on Jan 6.
If I was the Judge I would JAIL HIM just for making that statement that evidence is irrelevant and prejudicial.
This is what they did to Alex Jones. He was not allowed to present a defense. He was not even allowed to plead innocent.
The “evidence” against a defendant should speak for itself but Heaven forbid a defendant be permitted to defend himself! Yeah, there’s a winning strategy.
If Trump is guilty, then so are the folks that let them in.
When your prosecutorial strategy requires you to hide known facts, just maybe you’re doing wrong
A black DC jury might be sympathetic to a white man who was set up by the FBI. After all, most of the original Black Panthers were assassinated thanks to the FBI.
The old suppression of evidence to the jury ploy.
How many people were videoed breaking windows at the Capitol on Jan. 6?
How many have been arrested? (Answer: ONE!)
All the rest were undercover stooges!
Every undercover federal agent and officer present at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2001, should be prosecuted for unlawful provocation against peaceful protestors. The only reason for these scoundrels to be disguised is they were engaging in criminal conspiracy and overt criminal acts against Americans exercising their First Amendment rights.
These federal officers are no better than members of the Nazi Gestapo in Hitler’s Germany.
They are lawless thugs acting in disregard of American law and the U.S. Constitution.
Gotta protect the covert ops at all costs.
If everyone understands that the FBI and Congressional Democrats staged an invasion of the Congress, the whole thing blows sky high.
How can the presence of provocateurs be “irrelevant disinformation” if it’s true?