Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Brilliant "Strategery" of the White House
Opinion | Sixxiron

Posted on 09/09/2004 9:17:47 PM PDT by sixxiron

In this story, it has been reported that CBS obtained the Air National Guard documents, turned them over to the White House and then the White House released them. Just MHO, but I have to believe that someone in the White House knew that the documents were bogus and allowed them to be released knowing what would happen next. If this is true, then this is a stroke of strategic genius. It puts a black eye on CBS, bloodies the lip of the DNC and should put a blanket on any further “Bush National Guard” questions. All of which make JFKerry look more and more desperate. Again, this theory is just an opinion, but I can’t imagine the White House releasing documents as damning as these without knowing that they were blatant fakes and also knowing that others would spot them too. What do you think? W2004!!!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: airnationalguard; bush; cbs; rather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: SandyInSeattle
our troll radar is on overdrive these days

LOL.....I check EVERYBODY who I haven't know for years......LOL.

21 posted on 09/09/2004 9:41:04 PM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

And look at Cheney!


22 posted on 09/09/2004 9:43:04 PM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
At the risk of being branded a troll,

TROLL!!!!

Sorry, someone had to do it.

:-)

23 posted on 09/09/2004 9:44:00 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I seriously doubt that when CBS submitted these docs to the WH that they said, "yeah, we just want you to review these because we are planning on having Barnes use these to rip you in prime time". I think it started as two separate stories (Barnes and the docs) and then CBS bundled them to make one more sensational story.


24 posted on 09/09/2004 9:46:01 PM PDT by sixxiron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Y'all don't EVER want to play poker with W......Great strategery and he always gets Misunderestimated.......


25 posted on 09/09/2004 9:49:05 PM PDT by bioprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron
What do you think?

I think your medication needs to be looked at, to be honest. They're either giving you too much or not enough... of something. Or are you self-medicating?
26 posted on 09/09/2004 9:49:25 PM PDT by KangarooJacqui (What did John Kerry do on 9/11? He sat there like a stuned beeber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron
This is plausible, IMHO; I've been thinking the same.

Observe how the release of the 2nd (forged) Kerry-Fonda photo immunized Kerry from the discussions of the 1st (real) Kerry-Fonda photo. After CBS is exposed on this, it is unlikely that anyone would follow on any Bush/NG stories. If Rove is behind this, this may be the idea.

Also, observe that this exposes Kerry as someone who is darn easy to dupe. Not a kind of president we need.

27 posted on 09/09/2004 9:50:48 PM PDT by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron
Your an idiot, Bush is above the fold on this. Bush wouldn't permit them to play games of any kind out of the White House.

You don't understand Bush, he respects the office of President and brings honor to the office.

There is nothing here. They may have known these were bogus, but even if they didn't it didn't change what and how they operate.

I think you are a plant because you don't appreciate how not sleazy Bush is.
28 posted on 09/09/2004 9:50:56 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron
Asinine. You attempt to attribute the machinations of your comrades to good people.

sixxiron: 2004-09-01.
29 posted on 09/09/2004 9:54:09 PM PDT by mtntop3 ("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Great photo of the Bush 'look'....Cheney has a good 'look' too!


30 posted on 09/09/2004 9:55:07 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (I trust NOBODY BUT BUSH! Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Before you rip me as a "plant", please read my other posts. Granted, I am new, but jeez, a guy has to start somewhere. As a native Texan, I love W and in the grand scheme of things I don't think that allowing forged documents that you didn't create, to be released, when they were going to be released anyway, is low or underhanded at all. I'm not suggesting that the WH forged these documents themselves, I'm just suggesting that they let these guys hang themselves with their own rope.


31 posted on 09/09/2004 9:58:21 PM PDT by sixxiron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron
That my friend is a much better way to put it. As this is the White House it wouldn't be Presidential for the Office of the President to tell the Press not to run a story for political reasons. :>
32 posted on 09/09/2004 10:01:41 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron
That my friend is a much better way to put it. As this is the White House it wouldn't be Presidential for the Office of the President to tell the Press not to run a story for political reasons. :>
33 posted on 09/09/2004 10:01:42 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron

hmmmmm depends who in the WH saw them. If you were never in the military or no lights came on about the font's you would have no idea if they were legit or not. It is up to CBS to determine authinticy and not the WH if they are going to run with them. These aren't Bush's records but allegedly personal memo's belonging to another.


34 posted on 09/09/2004 10:03:08 PM PDT by The Bandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21; bioprof; Howlin

Yeah, I love that photo. Saved it as soon as I saw it. While I like Cheney's look, the expression on Bush's face is priceless. I wish I could see the look on Clinton's face.


35 posted on 09/09/2004 10:10:26 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men are ready to do violence on our behalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
I wish I could see the look on Clinton's face.

Perhaps he's biting his lower lip....?

BTW have you heard the breaking news from Slick's doctors?

It was reported that doctors are very concerned about Clinton's condition and fear that he may take a turn for the nurse.

LOL

36 posted on 09/09/2004 10:22:26 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (I trust NOBODY BUT BUSH! Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
Richard...I don't disagree with your (or sixxiron's) assessment, but we can't be the source for DU trolls playing the "gotcha" game. They are going to point to comments like this and say, "See even the Bush people think that Bush is behind this".

And, ultimately, I know that the MSM will try to pin this on the President, VP Cheney, Karl Rove, Halliburton or someone else. It's their template. It's what they say about all of this stuff and it's false. But, that has never prevented them from doing or saying these things.

Look, in November, if the electorate rises up and crushes the demoSCUMs and John Kerry, I will feel very assured that there are less and less "sheeple" and more and more people are paying attention to what's going on (i.e, getting their information from more than Danny, Petah', or Tommy Blowchow).

Until that happens, I am going to be hopeful, but I'm going to be skeptical. Sorry, I'm just so jaded on the MSM's bias that I can't help but think that the MSM still "controls" too much of the electorate's opinions. I will happily be wrong. If the MSM doesn't blame (or insinuate blame) Bush for the documents, I will openly, publicly apologize to you (and our young Padawan, sixxiron).

37 posted on 09/09/2004 10:27:01 PM PDT by mattdono ([John Edwards before going on stage 20 minutes after President] Hold muh' senses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron
I think you misunderestimate us.


38 posted on 09/09/2004 10:39:16 PM PDT by wolicy_ponk (Kerry, follow me no closer than 1000 yards, or I'll teach you what a real purple heart is. -T.Peck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono

Fair point, and I agree with your assessment of the old media. I watched Nightline tonight for the first time in probably ten years, and even though they sorta kinda almost accepted the documents as fake, they didn't mention that Ben Barnes was a Kerry contributor. Koppel also got into an extended discussion with some bozo and they agreed that the forged documents couldn't possibly have come from Kerry because it would be too stupid, but were undoubtedly from someone trying to help Kerry that went overboard.


39 posted on 09/09/2004 10:49:45 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men are ready to do violence on our behalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sixxiron
I think that you came up a little short there.... shanked it Mr. six iron.. now put away that tinfoil hat of yours. And get back to reality. What would the white house have to gain by discrediting a bias new org. Nothing. We have know for years that news reporting has been biased, the white house deals with it the same why most Americas do we laugh at it. There is no conspiracy here. Just open partisan politics played by a group that should not be playing like that.
40 posted on 09/09/2004 11:22:29 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Zell Miller for Secretary of Defense against liberals! (jeez spitballs.. now thats funny!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson