Posted on 06/26/2005 6:38:31 AM PDT by franksolich
The first part of the week was dominated by a "discussion" (quotation marks intentional) on the Michael Malloy radio show web-site; as the week went on, it was obvious the Andyites need, very badly, a new spokesman, as the DUmmiette, the dirty one, the cursing one, and the DUmmie "meth" flopped, just absolutely flopped, in the argument-and-logic department.
I suggested the Andyites "hire" the DUmmie "MoPaul" as a new spokesman--surely the DUmmie "MoPaul" could be more articulate, more to-the-subject--but the Andyites of course do not pay any attention to me or my suggestions.
Incidentally, those from the "outside" watching this issue insist this side, the side combating deceit and fraud, has made two major mistakes; major mistakes in that a great deal of time was wasted, accomplishing nothing.
The first mistake was that Sunday evening in the other conservative web-site, in which the DUmmie PUnidiot "William Pitt" and the enigmatic "Disgruntled" answered "questions" and displayed "documents," with the obvious coaching behind the curtains, of the foul-mouthed lad.
As these "outsiders" have pointed out, while the "answers" and the "documents" provided a great deal of diversion and amusement, since they did not answer any one of the three questions, that is all it was; diversion and amusement.
Even if the "answers" were honest and the "documents" authentic, that still would not have answered any of the three questions.
The second of the two major mistakes was all the time and trouble wasted on the Malloy thread--a discussion web-site controlled by the Andyites, which made the whole exercise pointless--and it was not even amusing or entertaining, only name-calling.
One thing of interest was pointed out by one of these "outsiders" examining the "debate": "You know, these people have a very odd perception of the law.
"If they like something, it's 'legal;' if they don't like something, it's 'illegal.'
"That seems to be their definition of the 'law;' whatever they want the 'law' to be, the 'law' is."
Uh-huh.
Another thing of interest to another "outsider" was the perception of the Andyites that those struggling for a better and safer America, are on the "payroll" of someone from somewhere.
Karl Rove, Bev Harris, the Republican National Committee, whatever.
"Doesn't it occur to these [jokers] that there's still some people in America who don't have to be paid to fulfill their civic and moral obligations to society; that there's people in America who actually spend money to fulfill those obligations?"
Uh-huh.
But maybe, just maybe, possibly, there may be a check in the mailbox tomorrow, signed by Karl Rove or Bev Harris or the Republican National Committee; one can always hope.
Then in mid-week, the red round one ended up in a hospital in Seattle; about the same time the DUmmiette ostensibly (one says "ostensibly," because one has to take her at her word) contacted the Secretary of State of Washington (state)--there appears to be dispute about who contacted whom, though--but in either case, it is not likely to be as simple, as easy, as the DUmmiette has led on.
Coincidentally, about this same time, the post-operative biopsy was to be released by the dirty one--another "document" that, while interesting, would still not answer any of the three simple, easy questions--but it was never posted.
Currently, the red round one lounges in the hospital, complaining about "cockroaches" and "silverfish," and the Head Warden "Skinner" has banned all discussion of chicken, and recipes for chicken, in DUmmieland, because the Andyites had ostensibly been using such threads to discuss things in "code."
One feels for the Head Warden "Skinner," who surely must be exasperated at Andyites nearly twice his age, who act as if overgrown children.
Day 60, the beginning of what promises to be a promising and productive week.
"I'll wear funny hats until Franksolich resumes the Norwegian threads!"
--- Princess Mette-Marit
Thread from DUmmieland (last night) featuring both Andy and Ben Burch:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x380614
They just don't let go of Bev Harris, do they?
Bennie is wanting proof of accountability and wanting documents posted. They just merrily yak on and on and the irony never occurs to them! LOL
Okay, so she would have had to file with the SOS out there to fund raise?
Sounds like Ben has gotten an education these past couple of weeks. Suddenly it is important to register fundraisers with the Secretary of State.
I remember something about this 'cat fight' last year after Scamdy got canned. Wish I could search DU for the thread.
She's everywhere !!!!!
She's everywhere !!!!!
"To Ben Burch and Andy Stephenson"
"Guys, I'm extremely disappointed that you've chosen to unleash another round of uninstigated attacks against Bev Harris."
"I am going to demand full accountability here like a Pitbull."
Are his demands for "full accountability" selective?
We will see.
Well he's got the subjective part right, he's certainly proved he's not objective.
"My main involvement in this web fracas has just been to help Andy Stephenson get well, using my argumentative skills because I don't have a hell of a lot of money.
"Now, I'm not saying that anything I perceive about Bev Harris that I've stated here is grounded in fact. I'm just saying that this is my subjective impression..."
What a bonehead.
Anybody know what was on Post #10 before it was deleted?
I think Andy shot off his mouth.
Pretty rich and ironic--a bunch of whiners complaining that their donations may have sunk into a black hole and someone profited obscenely. Pot. Kettle. Black.
I just noticed that. SCALEMAN posted it above. Why would Scamdy want that deleted? Hmmmm....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.