It's the furriners....the FURRINERS!!!!
Look, you fools. You're in danger. Can't you see? They're after you. They're after all of us. Our wives, our children, everyone. They're here already. YOU'RE NEXT!
Posted on 07/05/2006 5:21:34 AM PDT by conservativecorner
He's done a fine job in attracting his like kind here. It's been informative.
just sign up for my newsletter ( $2500/year) and you'll receive the locations and also the secret handshake needed to get in.
He doesn't need the swiftvets... He's got Gilchrist!
It was right under our noses. Here are some nuggets from a WND article:
05/01/2006
Founder of Minutemen targets run for president
by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.
WorldNetDaily.com
Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman Project, is considering a run for president in 2008 representing the Constitution Party.
~snip~
Chairman James Clymer told WorldNetDaily the party was excited about the possibility of Gilchrist as its marquis candidate.
~snip~
Gilchrist told WND the only candidate he would support as the Republican Party presidential nominee in 2008 was Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.
"If John McCain enters the race for president," Gilchrist said. "I will definitely run. John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for president on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."
said they are nothing more than "a declaration that we are no longer a nation governed by the rule of law, but that we are being ruled by mob rule."
~snip~
Gilchrist told WND that he thought his third-party candidacy could be viable, noting "the country is ready for a third-party candidate, just like the country was ready for Ross Perot in 1992."
Gilchrist was harshly critical of Bush’s leadership on the immigration issue.
"The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign. President Bush has shown he is incompetent to handle his job. It amounts to dereliction of duty that President Bush has left our border with Mexico wide open while supposedly he is fighting a war on terror."
~snip~
The Constitution Party supported Gilchrist in 2005, when he ran as an independent for Congress after Rep. Chris Cox, R-Calif., resigned to become chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Committee. Gilchrist received 25.5 percent of the vote in the general election, losing to Republican John Campbell. At that time, Clymer put out a strong statement supporting Gilchrist’s candidacy. According to Dec. 15 party press release:
Jim Clymer, chairman of the Constitution Party, believes that a major change is in order. Both the House and the Senate have been thoroughly corrupted by influence-peddling for decades, Clymer said. But the solution is not to run the Democrats to power or to elect a more ethical Republican majority. The solution, according to Clymer, is to jettison the two major parties altogether and to start afresh with principle-based leadership.(end)
1) Marquis candidate? *lol*
2) "John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for president on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."
Does it seem odd that the Constitution Party thinks it would be okay to deny McCain the right to run for President? (end)
3)"The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign. President Bush has shown he is incompetent to handle his job
Their agenda is showing. These people hate Bush with extra passion.
4) Upcoming elections are always great for 3rd party wannabees to get that revenue stream flowing!
Perot was a billionaire who could identify problems but had no solutions except his "electronic town hall", which directly contravened a democratic republic. He proved himself to be mentally unstable and unfit for the presidency.
By the time the media got through with Gilchrist, he'd look like the Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
I love the third party mentality. If the President doesn't do what their agenda is, he should be impeached.
NEVER MIND THAT THEY HAVE NO CONGRESSMEN ELECTED TO VOTE FOR THAT.
Sound and fury signifying nothing, and WAY too prevalent here at FR.
Kansas City is the entry point, or hub, that will allow us to become an even bigger part of your economy.
--Luis Ernesto Dérbez, Mexican Secretary of Foreign Affairs
Ok, so? Please explain how that statement means there is some great evil conspiracy.
P.S. Should you get medication to deal with all of this?
Thanks for the ping!
Human Events was RWR's favorite magazine.
What is truly lazy, it appears to me, is demanding the Cliff Notes version of the facts. But let's try it this way, what worries you so the trucks on the road, the construction of the road, the operation of the road, what is transported on the road, what . . . ?
It's the furriners....the FURRINERS!!!!
Look, you fools. You're in danger. Can't you see? They're after you. They're after all of us. Our wives, our children, everyone. They're here already. YOU'RE NEXT!
And notice how since I've outed them, they have not been here. That my friend is proof positive.
If you had the ability to read the thread, you'd have realized that the quote above was related to my spoof post in #148.
Like I said all you free traders do is generalize. You reckon you could break that down to agricultural commodities and intra-company trade?
I noticed where Ford has plans to invest $9billion in a Mexico plant. That is more money than Cintra has invested in a half million acres in Texas.
That number was very specific.
You reckon you could break that down to agricultural commodities and intra-company trade?
Sorry. But don't let me stop you.
I noticed where Ford has plans to invest $9billion in a Mexico plant. That is more money than Cintra has invested in a half million acres in Texas.
So the Cintra investment in America is bad for America and the Ford investment in Mexico is bad for America?
Yeah, right. LOL
They post in all of these anti-immigration/trade threads to establish their "credentials" as a true patriot, but don't be fooled. It is all a front. Why do you think they signed up here on Dec 4, 2002? That is the secret anniversary date of the signing of the "Give Back 1/2 of Texas to Mexico" (Texas2) agreement. 12/4/2002. 12 is symbolic of 1 Texas going to 2 parts. 4 is symbolic of 2 two's, reinforcing nwo cosmic power, and 2002 is symbolic of transporter super highway with the new divided Texas (2) on both ends. Now of course the Texas2 lackies and will all come along and try to debunk this as nonsense.
Your names reminds me of UnAmericanWe can all change letters around can't we. I'll just leave the "ited "off. You didn't even have the decency to post this to me and I think that is UnAmerican
It is obvious you haven't read the thread or anything that I have said about toll roads.You are just here to call names but I think that is UnAmerican
Yeah, right. LOL
You're right. We only increased exports to Mexico from $41.5 billion in 1993 to $120.3 billion in 2005.
Source for the mathematically challenged (that's you, texastoo)
I just asked for you to be a little bit more specific. Is this in corn or intra-company trade? Too much for you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.