Skip to comments.
B-52 Flyby of USS Ranger
Family friend 'N.T.'
| Today
| Me
Posted on 07/06/2006 7:59:03 PM PDT by GoldCountryRedneck
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: JRios1968; Ditto
I ordered the report they did on the accident (the part releasable via the FOIA). I read that and wondered how the hell the guy was even flying. He was an accident waiting to happen.
Someone also got canned for allowing them to do aerobatics below flight minimums or something like that. I'd have to pull out the report.
For a good synopsis on what happened, you can review this:
http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=3405833376942&lang=en-US
The site is not available, but the cache version is still accessible...
61
posted on
07/07/2006 1:43:18 PM PDT
by
Fury
To: spectr17
The Ranger, a BUFF, and the Loch Ness monster.
All we need now is Beerman from New Orleans during Katrina.
62
posted on
07/07/2006 4:21:43 PM PDT
by
exit82
(If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
To: JRios1968
I think you must've been at our spring air show.
To: exit82
With the cards we have here @ FR, it won't take long for LooterGuy to show up in the pic. Question is, where will he be?
64
posted on
07/07/2006 8:18:52 PM PDT
by
NCC-1701
(RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
To: GoldCountryRedneck; Quix; TankerKC
....that even the harshest of the FReepSkeptics' would stand down. Have a look at this. It's a 7 frame gif I made just for the occasion:
It doesn't necessarily "prove" anything but the similarities are, well, striking. That is to say, the angles and lighting(such as it is) are virtually identical with one of a landing buff I pulled off the web. Resized and flipped horizontally yields the exact(except for some apparent trimming in a photo editing program off the bottom of the "original" buff. The physical size difference of the original pic and this one could account for some random fuzziness/lighting/detail.
Also note, that overlaying the pic off the web shows the buff in a "landing" attitude(just before flaring one would suspect), just off the deck, er, runway. I left the landing gear(barely visible) on the overlay.
FWIW, comparing the second, smaller pic posted on the thread yields identical results; exact angle and lighting. What are the odds? I say they're fakes ;^)
Also, I spent quite a while(God only knows why!) looking for a pic of USS Ranger that may have been used for the original. The only candidate I found didn't exist any more and all I had to look at was a thumbnail, that when zoomed in lost most of its detail.
Another aside; I probably looked at several hundred pics of buffs in flight and found several that would suggest the fuselage is virtually parallel to the horizon when in straight and level flight. Like when on a bombing run, etc...
FGS
65
posted on
07/07/2006 8:45:04 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
THANKS MUCH.
What an awesome amount of very clever work! Impressive.
Have a blessed weekend.
66
posted on
07/07/2006 9:05:26 PM PDT
by
Quix
(PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
To: Quix
67
posted on
07/07/2006 9:24:37 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: condi2008; Dashing Dasher
A very good friend of mine provided me the pic...
68
posted on
07/07/2006 9:31:31 PM PDT
by
JRios1968
(There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
To: NCC-1701
Yes, Looterguy, not Beerman.
Maybe we can get your handle, USS Enterprise of Star Trek reknown, in the picture too?
69
posted on
07/08/2006 5:12:03 AM PDT
by
exit82
(If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
To: exit82
70
posted on
07/08/2006 8:41:27 AM PDT
by
NCC-1701
(RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
To: GoldCountryRedneck
The picture makes it look like the BUFF was shot of the slanted part of the deck and the catapult didn't have enough umph to fling it aloft. As a result, the BUFF is going into the drink.
Neat picture though. Two fine examples of US power projectors.
71
posted on
07/08/2006 8:44:47 AM PDT
by
NCC-1701
(RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
To: Fury; JRios1968; Ditto; Rokke; Red6
There is a lot there to talk about for later more esoteric abstract discussion (or not)
Is that the kind of thing that should petitioned to a private thread?
Wolf
72
posted on
07/08/2006 11:06:56 PM PDT
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: TankerKC
No offense, but it doesn't look real. The BUFF looks way too low and the size doesn't seem proportional.Agreed. Besides, I didn't think a B52 could fly that low and still remain aloft (except for landings and takeoffs).
The outline of the plane in the above photo is correct, though.
These photos help to give a sense of scale. They are huge aircraft.
73
posted on
07/08/2006 11:35:28 PM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(Where you go with me, heaven will always be.)
To: RunningWolf; Ditto; Rokke; Red6
I'm game. I went to a school during my active duty days (1998) where we spent a few hours discussing Bud Holland.
74
posted on
07/09/2006 7:02:00 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
(There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
To: Wolfstar
75
posted on
07/09/2006 7:09:49 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
(There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
To: RunningWolf
Agreed on your last post...
76
posted on
07/09/2006 7:11:39 AM PDT
by
Fury
To: RunningWolf
The Fairchild AFB B-52 incident has been made a case study in poor leadership at Air Force professional military education schools. What a gross embarrassment.
77
posted on
07/09/2006 11:45:08 AM PDT
by
Rokke
To: RunningWolf
I like it whaen the MSM told us what "BUFF" meant, of course the PC version. :)
The B52 is another marvel of US arms development. As old as it is, it STILL is a viable platform that serves a purpose within the airframe mix the USAF has!
78
posted on
07/09/2006 2:25:48 PM PDT
by
Red6
To: Fury; JRios1968
http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1129710400/B52_Crash
You can see the film of that Fairchild AFB/ Bud Holland crash here-- I know next to nothing about planes (except that I love them) and even I can see what a dumb move something like that was. Wow how sad.
79
posted on
07/09/2006 2:34:28 PM PDT
by
lawgirl
(She comes on like thunder and she's more right than rain)
To: Wolfstar
This one was real although many think it isn't. Camera angle and lense mean everything. To confirm search USS AMERICA +F-14 +Snodgrass. The man standing on the flightdeck with hands behind back is an Admiral.
F-14 Fly-By USS AMERICA
80
posted on
07/09/2006 3:02:53 PM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson