Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B-52 Flyby of USS Ranger
Family friend 'N.T.' | Today | Me

Posted on 07/06/2006 7:59:03 PM PDT by GoldCountryRedneck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: JRios1968; Ditto
I ordered the report they did on the accident (the part releasable via the FOIA). I read that and wondered how the hell the guy was even flying. He was an accident waiting to happen.

Someone also got canned for allowing them to do aerobatics below flight minimums or something like that. I'd have to pull out the report.

For a good synopsis on what happened, you can review this:

http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=3405833376942&lang=en-US

The site is not available, but the cache version is still accessible...
61 posted on 07/07/2006 1:43:18 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: spectr17

The Ranger, a BUFF, and the Loch Ness monster.

All we need now is Beerman from New Orleans during Katrina.


62 posted on 07/07/2006 4:21:43 PM PDT by exit82 (If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

I think you must've been at our spring air show.


63 posted on 07/07/2006 7:23:32 PM PDT by condi2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: exit82

With the cards we have here @ FR, it won't take long for LooterGuy to show up in the pic. Question is, where will he be?


64 posted on 07/07/2006 8:18:52 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck; Quix; TankerKC
....that even the harshest of the FReepSkeptics' would stand down.

Have a look at this. It's a 7 frame gif I made just for the occasion:

It doesn't necessarily "prove" anything but the similarities are, well, striking. That is to say, the angles and lighting(such as it is) are virtually identical with one of a landing buff I pulled off the web. Resized and flipped horizontally yields the exact(except for some apparent trimming in a photo editing program off the bottom of the "original" buff. The physical size difference of the original pic and this one could account for some random fuzziness/lighting/detail.

Also note, that overlaying the pic off the web shows the buff in a "landing" attitude(just before flaring one would suspect), just off the deck, er, runway. I left the landing gear(barely visible) on the overlay.

FWIW, comparing the second, smaller pic posted on the thread yields identical results; exact angle and lighting. What are the odds? I say they're fakes ;^)

Also, I spent quite a while(God only knows why!) looking for a pic of USS Ranger that may have been used for the original. The only candidate I found didn't exist any more and all I had to look at was a thumbnail, that when zoomed in lost most of its detail.

Another aside; I probably looked at several hundred pics of buffs in flight and found several that would suggest the fuselage is virtually parallel to the horizon when in straight and level flight. Like when on a bombing run, etc...

FGS

65 posted on 07/07/2006 8:45:04 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

THANKS MUCH.

What an awesome amount of very clever work! Impressive.

Have a blessed weekend.


66 posted on 07/07/2006 9:05:26 PM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Quix

;^)


67 posted on 07/07/2006 9:24:37 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: condi2008; Dashing Dasher

A very good friend of mine provided me the pic...


68 posted on 07/07/2006 9:31:31 PM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

Yes, Looterguy, not Beerman.

Maybe we can get your handle, USS Enterprise of Star Trek reknown, in the picture too?


69 posted on 07/08/2006 5:12:03 AM PDT by exit82 (If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Not a bad idea.


70 posted on 07/08/2006 8:41:27 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck

The picture makes it look like the BUFF was shot of the slanted part of the deck and the catapult didn't have enough umph to fling it aloft. As a result, the BUFF is going into the drink.

Neat picture though. Two fine examples of US power projectors.


71 posted on 07/08/2006 8:44:47 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury; JRios1968; Ditto; Rokke; Red6
There is a lot there to talk about for later more esoteric abstract discussion (or not)

Is that the kind of thing that should petitioned to a private thread?

Wolf
72 posted on 07/08/2006 11:06:56 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
No offense, but it doesn't look real. The BUFF looks way too low and the size doesn't seem proportional.

Agreed. Besides, I didn't think a B52 could fly that low and still remain aloft (except for landings and takeoffs).

The outline of the plane in the above photo is correct, though.

These photos help to give a sense of scale. They are huge aircraft.


73 posted on 07/08/2006 11:35:28 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Where you go with me, heaven will always be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf; Ditto; Rokke; Red6

I'm game. I went to a school during my active duty days (1998) where we spent a few hours discussing Bud Holland.


74 posted on 07/09/2006 7:02:00 AM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
The Buff is huge...for a bomber. Still, though, the B-52 is "only" 159 feet long. Compare that to the USS Ranger's length of 1046 feet.
75 posted on 07/09/2006 7:09:49 AM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

Agreed on your last post...


76 posted on 07/09/2006 7:11:39 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

The Fairchild AFB B-52 incident has been made a case study in poor leadership at Air Force professional military education schools. What a gross embarrassment.


77 posted on 07/09/2006 11:45:08 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

I like it whaen the MSM told us what "BUFF" meant, of course the PC version. :)

The B52 is another marvel of US arms development. As old as it is, it STILL is a viable platform that serves a purpose within the airframe mix the USAF has!


78 posted on 07/09/2006 2:25:48 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Fury; JRios1968

http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1129710400/B52_Crash

You can see the film of that Fairchild AFB/ Bud Holland crash here-- I know next to nothing about planes (except that I love them) and even I can see what a dumb move something like that was. Wow how sad.


79 posted on 07/09/2006 2:34:28 PM PDT by lawgirl (She comes on like thunder and she's more right than rain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
This one was real although many think it isn't. Camera angle and lense mean everything. To confirm search USS AMERICA +F-14 +Snodgrass. The man standing on the flightdeck with hands behind back is an Admiral.

F-14 Fly-By USS AMERICA

80 posted on 07/09/2006 3:02:53 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson