Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/24/2006 11:13:29 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Due to the age of this article (1998), I'm just adding this to the GGG catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

2 posted on 08/24/2006 11:13:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Eberhard Zangger
...when Johann Karl Fuhlrott discovered the bones of a Neanderthal in a cave near Duesseldorf in 1856, the president of the German Society of Anthropology considered it a bow-legged, Mongolian Cossack with rickets, who had been lucky enough to survive multiple head injuries, but who, during a campaign by Russian forces against France in 1814, had been wounded, and (stark naked) had crawled into a cave, where he died.
Skeptical Quiz Results
Dr. Bob
October 2000
John Coffin found these quotes: 'Rudolf Virchow, who was not only a great man of medicine but a highly respected archaeologist, examined the skull and dismissed it as unimportant. According to Virchow, the strange appearance of Neanderthal man was the result of an attack of rickets in his youth, which had twisted his legs and deformed his pelvis. He had triumphed over this handicap, Virchow declared, and had become a doughty fighter. The flat forehead and the massive brow ridges were caused by repeated skull fractures suffered during combat.' -- And -- 'An anthropologist named Pruner-Bey announced that the man of the cave had been "a powerfully organized Celt somewhat resembling the modern Irish with low mental organization." Professor Mayer of Bonn suggested that the skeleton was that of one of the Russian Cossacks who had invaded Germany in 1814. Another authority disagreed: "The skull is so deformed that the man must have been diseased. He had water on the brain, was feeble-minded, and no doubt lived in the woods like a beast."'

3 posted on 08/24/2006 11:17:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Reminds me of Egil's Bones:

http://www.viking.ucla.edu/Scientific_American/Egils_Bones.htm


4 posted on 08/24/2006 11:45:53 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

If Neanderthal, dating from 350,000 years ago, was anatomically a modern human but modified by an iodine deficiency, then modern humans should have appeared a lot earlier than 100,000 years ago where iodine was abundant.


8 posted on 08/25/2006 12:34:40 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Neanderthal, iodine bkmark


13 posted on 08/25/2006 3:08:58 AM PDT by Khurkris (When the levee breaks there'll be no place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Aha! Now everything makes perfect sense. Memo to self: E-mail neanderthal ex-boyfriend that he should ditch the salt-free diet & increase consumption of seafood & broccolli immediately.


14 posted on 08/25/2006 8:32:36 AM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson