Skip to comments.
'Sexy substitute' gets no jail time
WorldNetDaily ^
| September 19, 2006
Posted on 09/19/2006 10:17:57 AM PDT by Sopater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
"If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration," noted 3rd District Judge Mark Kouris during sentencing yesterday for Cameo Patch.
I can't believe he would actually say that out loud...
1
posted on
09/19/2006 10:17:59 AM PDT
by
Sopater
To: Sopater
To: Sopater
Why don't the courts just come on out and officially declare that there are a different set of laws for women.
Sheesh.
3
posted on
09/19/2006 10:20:09 AM PDT
by
TChris
(Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
To: Sopater
"..."If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration,"..."
But since you're a 29 year old hottie, you get a pass.
4
posted on
09/19/2006 10:21:31 AM PDT
by
NCC-1701
(RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
To: Sopater
"Defense attorney Jon Williams said the boy had "created the environment and invited..."" It's always the man's fault...or "boy's" in this case.
5
posted on
09/19/2006 10:22:53 AM PDT
by
GBA
To: Sopater
"If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration," noted 3rd District Judge Mark Kouris during sentencing yesterday for Cameo Patch.
But this woman gets a pass on an act of pedophilia because she's a woman. Thanks for admitting that you're not qualified to be a judge, your honor.
To: Sopater
She's hot and the guy was 17 for gawd sakes. When I was 17 I was FAR from a virgin. Plus did I mention she is hot?
7
posted on
09/19/2006 10:23:09 AM PDT
by
mlbford2
(I love my Semis, but for me they are for the range. My life is protected by my S&W revolver.)
To: Sopater
What a moron that judge is. The penalty should be the same, regardless of the gender of the teacher.
As for this teacher, she'll have plenty of time with her kids. She's not going to be teaching again. How lucky they are to have such a moral model for a mom. Feh!
To: Sopater
9
posted on
09/19/2006 10:23:27 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: NCC-1701
Don't forget, we had clinton and the entire Drive By Media telling us for three years that oral sex wasn't really sex anyway.
10
posted on
09/19/2006 10:23:41 AM PDT
by
Wil H
To: Sopater
Well, at least she will never teach again in a public school setting. What a whacked out nutjob.
11
posted on
09/19/2006 10:23:42 AM PDT
by
Fury
To: TChris
"Why don't the courts just come on out and officially declare that there are a different set of laws for (attractive) women."
12
posted on
09/19/2006 10:23:43 AM PDT
by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: TChris
I think that what he was really thinking was
If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, or if you weren't so darn cute, I would be inclined to order some incarceration...
13
posted on
09/19/2006 10:23:49 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(Creatio Ex Nihilo)
To: TChris
No, its a different set of laws for ATTRACTIVE women.
If she looked like Hillary Clinton, she would be doing time.
14
posted on
09/19/2006 10:23:51 AM PDT
by
Holicheese
(Beerfest could be the greatest movie ever made!)
To: NCC-1701
"The informant stated Patch "performed oral sex" on the student, but did not engage in sexual intercourse."
When interviewed for the article, the boy declared, "I did not have sex with that woman." Patch, wearing a blue dress to the hearing confirmed that no sexual intercourse took place.
15
posted on
09/19/2006 10:24:06 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
("Freedom by its nature cannot be imposed, it must be chosen")
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Not pedophilia with a 17 year old.
16
posted on
09/19/2006 10:24:18 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: Sopater
"ordered to obtain a psycho-sexual evaluation" Is that a new term? And where can I find some of those in the female varity? ;-)
17
posted on
09/19/2006 10:24:35 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: Sopater
Heh, heh . . . a fill-in at Tool highschool . . .
18
posted on
09/19/2006 10:24:49 AM PDT
by
Caveman Lawyer
("If there is anybody here I have not insulted, I apologize." - Brahms, leaving a party in Vienna.)
To: MineralMan
There is a reason for double standards in society.
19
posted on
09/19/2006 10:24:49 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: mlbford2
"When I was 17 I was FAR from a virgin. Plus did I mention she is hot?
"
I wasn't a virgin at 17, either, but my girlfriends were also high school students, not teachers.
Who cares if she's "hot." Teachers should not be having sex with students. It's that simple.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson