Skip to comments.
New Magnesium Alloy is 35% lighter than Aluminum and 20-40% stronger!
Stockpirate
| November 24, 2006
| Stockpirate
Posted on 11/24/2006 8:00:41 AM PST by stockpirate
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: stockpirate; Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
41
posted on
11/24/2006 4:39:56 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Thursday, November 16, 2006 https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: stockpirate
How is the alloy heat treated?
Do you have a TTT curve you can publish for the product you are laying claim to produce?
and what is its modulus of Elasticity?
42
posted on
11/24/2006 4:47:45 PM PST
by
Cvengr
To: stockpirate
I would like the hear from others as to what they may consider as uses for this exciting new product. Bicycles!
...oh, and is the company publically traded yet?
Cheers!
43
posted on
11/24/2006 5:01:43 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Dark Skies
Probably have to use a larger tube like alum or titanium (larger than steel) and thicken the tube walls so the frame doesn't produce a mushy ride. I like the stiffness of a steel frame but the lighter weight of alum and titanium is also a nice feature. Agreed!
Dark, are you an engineer or designer of frames? Or a rider?
Cheers!
44
posted on
11/24/2006 5:03:22 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: stockpirate
I think it would be great to use for bike frames. Currently used materials are:
- Steel Alloy (Cheap, heavy)
- Aluminum (Moderate cost, relatively light, stiffness makes for a harsh ride)
- Titanium (strong, very light, very expensive)
- Carbon fiber (very light, somewhat out of favor)
There's probably others, but these are the materials of which I am aware.
45
posted on
11/24/2006 5:11:50 PM PST
by
Scutter
To: Dark Skies
Actually aluminum is a stiffer (more jarring) ride because it does not flex as much as steel.
46
posted on
11/24/2006 5:13:15 PM PST
by
Scutter
To: stockpirate
When you can say, I would love to hear who the bike manufacturer is.
47
posted on
11/24/2006 5:16:47 PM PST
by
Scutter
To: grey_whiskers
Hey "grey_whiskers./"
I am just a daily long-term rider.
I am a successful bipolar "convict" who has used the bike to escape the need for medication.
I am 58 y/o and ride 5-6 hard hours a week.
Love my bike. It has saved my life many times over.
I spent my career on Wall St as an investment banker until my "condition" overtook me. Now I ride and write.
Things are better now than before.
My brother was a hyperactive kid as was I. He is also a committed cyclist.
I recommend it to all who like or need exercise (which IMO is all of us).
Good luck with your cycling.
48
posted on
11/24/2006 5:18:37 PM PST
by
Dark Skies
("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
To: Scutter
I have never owned an alum frame but have been told that the reason the alum frames are bigger tubes is to achieve comparable stiffness with steel.
I have always riden steel frames.
Can't argue the technology since I haven't riden alum or titanium.
49
posted on
11/24/2006 5:26:55 PM PST
by
Dark Skies
("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
To: Dark Skies
I have never owned an alum frame but have been told that the reason the alum frames are bigger tubes is to achieve comparable stiffness with steel.
You are 100% correct, and I am wrong. Apparently I was the victim of a popular myth. Details
here.
50
posted on
11/24/2006 6:04:54 PM PST
by
Scutter
To: Scutter
You may by wrong (I don't know that but you say you are) but wrong or right you are obviously a big man (a man of big heart). It takes a real man to so freely admit his error (if indeed it is).
You have earned my respect. Thank you for your example!!!
How wonderful to be wrong about unimportant details and be right about one's soul.
My greatest thx!
51
posted on
11/24/2006 6:23:11 PM PST
by
Dark Skies
("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
To: Cagey
I'll stick with my carbon bikes.
52
posted on
11/24/2006 6:27:39 PM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(The US Military Services are THE BEST PEOPLE on the planet. God protect them.)
To: Dark Skies
It takes a real man to so freely admit his error (if indeed it is).
Thanks for the kind words. I saw your post about Wall Street. Do you ride in the NYC area? I travel up there every 3 weeks or so for a project I am working on. I love the area, but not being on a bike for a week is tough.
53
posted on
11/24/2006 6:37:32 PM PST
by
Scutter
To: Scutter
I live down South now (in Georgia) where I grew up. Spent many years in NYC and love and miss it much. Used to ride in Central Park on weekends and daily in the summers. Bought one of the first Specialized Stump Jumpers in 1985 on the upper East Side. I gave it to my Dad and it is still out in the shed.
Have ridden Specialized and Trek ever since.
Riding makes the body and the mind strong. Keep riding!
54
posted on
11/24/2006 6:43:55 PM PST
by
Dark Skies
("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
To: Dark Skies
I live down South now (in Georgia) where I grew up.
LOL. That's where I live -- Suwanee, GA -- a suburb north of Atlanta.
55
posted on
11/24/2006 8:20:39 PM PST
by
Scutter
To: SunkenCiv; stockpirate
To: Cvengr
Cvengr I will get thise figures in the next couple of days.
But all of the specs have been increased and the material can be extruded.
57
posted on
11/25/2006 5:46:33 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
To: stockpirate
A kind of "out there" potential use would be for airship frames and fittings----if any ever get much past the drawing board.
58
posted on
11/25/2006 8:04:08 AM PST
by
Rockpile
To: Dark Skies
Have ridden Specialized and Trek ever since. Nice brands :-)
I have a Specialized for commuting and a Cannondale road bike; my wife has a Trek commuter bike and a K2 mountain bike.
Cheers!
59
posted on
11/25/2006 9:13:20 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: stockpirate
We live off of 6061 when building space hardware. A lighter, stronger material would be great as long as it's not too much more expensive.
You wouldn't happen to have tried polishing it to optical quality, would you? Matching materials means the whole system is athermal.
60
posted on
11/27/2006 4:03:14 PM PST
by
MikeD
(We live in a world where babies are like velveteen rabbits that only become real if they are loved.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson