Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sifting through the thin MacBook rumors
Apple 20 ^ | DECEMBER 7, 2007, 8:55 AM

Posted on 12/07/2007 12:45:51 PM PST by Swordmaker

The Apple (AAPL) rumor sites have been buzzing for months about the new thin MacBook they expect Steve Jobs to unveil Jan. 15 at Macworld Expo 2008. Now, with the company’s annual showcase for new products less than six weeks away, the talking heads of cable business news have started to pick up the scent.

Yesterday was CNBC’s Jim Goldman’s turn. In a breathless report that aired shortly after noon (video, text), he cited a source “with good connections” to Apple’s manufacturing partners and rattled off what 9to5Mac characterized as “the known knowns”:

Actually, that last “known” is in dispute. AppleInsider, quoting its own manufacturing sources, maintains that the machine will have a 13.3 inch display. And the $1,500 price point, while devoutly to be wished, seems too aggressive by half. As Ars Technica points out, solid-state hard drives come very dear; the 64 GB Samsung drive alone costs about $1,000 (link). There are a bunch of flash-based 64 GB subnotebooks on the market, and they start at $2,000.

CNBC’s Goldman had other Apple news: that the iPod touch is selling well and Apple is ramping up production (a known known), and that a 3G iPhone is coming out next year, as early as May or June (a known rumor, but don’t hold your breath for May/June delivery).

(Excerpt) Read more at apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS:
Thanks to Tubebender for the heads up...
1 posted on 12/07/2007 12:45:52 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1234; 50mm; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; af_vet_rr; afnamvet; Alexander Rubin; Amadeo; ...
Notebooks to go on a Mac Diet? Rumor has it they are getting skinnier... PING!


NOT the possible Mac ThinBook...

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 12/07/2007 12:53:24 PM PST by Swordmaker (Entered and posted entirely with my iPhone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Hope they don’t get any thinner.
I have to lift the side of my Mac Book to plug in an ethernet or usb cable now!


3 posted on 12/07/2007 12:59:16 PM PST by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Why do they think only flash for storage? Apple could easily put the 1.8” 160 GB hard drive from the iPod in there and it’ll cost a lot less. They may not be fast, but sub-notebooks aren’t about speed, and cache alleviate the problem.


4 posted on 12/07/2007 1:29:35 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

I’m looking forward to all solid-state storage. Flash or otherwise.

No moving parts. No bearings to fail. Much lower power draw.

I’ll be all over it.


5 posted on 12/07/2007 1:33:30 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Not to mention the instant start up.


6 posted on 12/07/2007 1:40:21 PM PST by Reaganesque (Charter Member of the Romney FR Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Could anything that thin have an optical drive?


7 posted on 12/07/2007 2:39:22 PM PST by Sunnyflorida (Peace is the aftermath of victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
I’m looking forward to all solid-state storage. Flash or otherwise.

Just give us a FW800 port so we could plug in external HDs for special needs. Owners of a thin, rugged MacBook with 32G flash HD might well buy several external disks for different needs. Say, one for a set of virtual machine images and one for archived media.

8 posted on 12/07/2007 3:16:38 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Re: why Flash ?

I can think of several reasons. First memory usage is interchangable as either RAM or storage. Second battery life. A notebook churns the HD more than an iPod which basically quickly downloads the next item and goes back to sleep. Third, to be first.

Remember, though, this is just a rumor.


9 posted on 12/07/2007 3:50:57 PM PST by Swordmaker (Entered and posted entirely with my iPhone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sunnyflorida

Re: optical drive.

Unlikely. Probably will use USB or Firewire to connect to an external. Or, who knows, maybe WIFI(n) transfers to and from your home computer. You really don’t need every application on your Mac ThinBook (I just coined that name today, catchy, ain’t it?)


10 posted on 12/07/2007 3:57:20 PM PST by Swordmaker (Entered and posted entirely with my iPhone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona

ExpressCard/34 please


11 posted on 12/07/2007 4:40:03 PM PST by whatexit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Not sure WiFi would be fast enough for most optical transfers. Firewire would be good.

I like MacThinBook.


12 posted on 12/07/2007 5:30:10 PM PST by Sunnyflorida (Peace is the aftermath of victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sunnyflorida

I thought flash drives had limited life? That they could be rewritten only so many times? I have been told to use my thumb flash drives for only a year or so because they can corrupt???


13 posted on 12/07/2007 5:36:05 PM PST by kmiller1k (remain calm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I know the whys of flash, just talking about cost. Going flash-only will make this the best ultra-portable ever, but it will be very expensive.


14 posted on 12/07/2007 6:36:04 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kmiller1k
I thought flash drives had limited life? That they could be rewritten only so many times?

It should easily last several years. The regular minimum life is 100,000 cycles (what are you doing that with your thumb drive?), but advanced write management techniques can extend that a lot.

15 posted on 12/07/2007 6:41:32 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

The rumor mill includes the potential price of $1500. I suspect that might be the low end version which would use an iPod like HD. the Flash drive version would likely be much more expensive.


16 posted on 12/07/2007 7:22:42 PM PST by Swordmaker (Entered and posted entirely with my iPhone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I'd rather see a tablet resembling a large-screen iPhone. You could use the very cool Apple wireless keyboard, via Bluetooth, if you really need a physical keyboard.

I'm working with some doctors who would wet their pants if they could use such a computer as a client device for their electronic medical record system.

17 posted on 12/07/2007 8:53:35 PM PST by AZLiberty (President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

just an idea...

What is eSATA?
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-esata.htm

[snip] SATA replaced ATA legacy technology as the next generation internal bus interface for hard drives. The SATA interface is more streamlined than ATA and provides serial architecture for greater speed than the older parallel technology. SATA cables are narrow and can be up to six feet (2 meters) in length, whereas parallel cables are much wider and limited to a length of 18 inches (45.7 cm). With eSATA, the speed of SATA expands to encompass exterior storage solutions.

While eSATA reaches transfer rates triple those of USB 2.0 and FireWire 400, it does have one drawback. eSATA requires its own power connector, unlike the aforementioned interfaces. However, it is an excellent choice for external disk storage. Unlike USB and FireWire interfaces, eSATA does not have to translate data between the interface and the computer. This enhances data transfer speeds, while saving computer processor resources and eliminating the need for an extra off-load chip. [end]


18 posted on 12/07/2007 9:54:39 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Friday, December 7, 2007_____________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

Re: large iPhone like tablet.

I’ve been expecting something like that. I’d like a 12 inch multi-touch screen tablet with a single “home” button and everything else virtualized. I have found that the iPhone’s predictive text is a wonder and wish I could use it in my Mac. A twelve inch screen with a virtual keyboard would be large enough to type with both hands. Like the iPhone’s, the tablet’s keyboard would only appear when necessary - but every screen would need a virtual button to invoke a keyboard when the user desires it regardless what the application wants. However, this keyboard would require the ability to interpret more than just two contact points to accomodate the times when three or more keys may need to be depressed at once.


19 posted on 12/07/2007 11:01:08 PM PST by Swordmaker (Entered and posted entirely with my iPhone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

“I’d like a 12 inch multi-touch screen tablet “

With a wireless chipset that lets it connect to the VerizonWireless network.

I want something smaller than my macbook to take on the road when all I need is to check email and download my Rush 24/7 daily podcasts without finding or paying for a wifi hotspot.


20 posted on 12/08/2007 5:31:10 AM PST by Sunnyflorida (Peace is the aftermath of victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson