I’ve seen several kinds of electric-gravity and expanding Earth theories to explain the larger dinosaurs. One thing I haven’t seen however is any sort of a theory to explain ancients building with stones too heavy for any technology, ancient or modern either one, to move. There are a couple of temple column stones like that in Baalbek Lebanon, and then what they call “geoglyphs” in Peru which amount to walls or something or other made with 200-ton fitted stones. Those things require reduced gravity as well?
If attenuated gravity existed beyond the dinosaurs into human historic times, then yes, reduced gravity might help explain those monolithic stones. Mythology gives us some hints that it may have.
Hi Ted. Back so soon?
>One thing I haven’t seen however is any sort of a theory to explain ancients building with stones too heavy for any technology, ancient or modern either one, to move. There are a couple of temple column stones like that in Baalbek Lebanon, and then what they call “geoglyphs” in Peru which amount to walls or something or other made with 200-ton fitted stones. Those things require reduced gravity as well?<
Uh, fiht heavy stone with heavy stone? That is, one could heap up sand on one side of a block and then drag the other side so it’s effectively leihter. Maybe the landscape was significantly different then, and full of streams or ise or earth. On flat ground without any help, one could dig a ditch on the forward side and heap the dirt behind the block, so the block gradually slides downhill. Then when the block is lastly in spot, dig out all the earth so the ground is flat again.