Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

Oooh, the “Thunderbird”:

http://www.lightmission.com/Admin.Web/Images/Teratorn-25ft.jpg

BTW, let me be the first (I guess, I didn’t read any comments yet) to accuse you of being, in reality, Ted Holden / medved. ;’)

I’ve never found this particular argument to be compelling; it is rooted in the idea that the “bronto”saurus had to wade to allow the water to support some of their weight, then eventually got stuck in the mud, died, fell over, and became fossilized. :’)


48 posted on 03/21/2008 10:05:08 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/______________________Profile updated Saturday, March 1, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
Re: poor old bronte in the mud theory.

That was the original thinking of Paleontologists... But Apatosaurus's feet were not adapted for muddy conditions, nor were Ultrasaurus and Seismasaurus or any of the huge Brachiosauri (branch eaters). Their skeletons are those of land walkers. That is the dilemma.

50 posted on 03/21/2008 10:51:00 AM PDT by Swordmaker (There ain't no such thing as a free app...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

This topic was posted 3/21/2008. Thanks Swordmaker.

306 posted on 01/26/2021 7:10:25 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson