Posted on 07/14/2008 3:26:56 AM PDT by cdchik123
In a blockbuster New York news conference Monday, July 14th, Andy Martin asks: "Why has Barack Obama been lying for decades about the 'marriage' of his parents when he knew full well he was lying? There was no marriage. How can anyone vote for Obama for president when Obama is so cowardly he can't tell the truth to the American people?" Andy Martin's book and writing begin to impact the presidential campaign.
~snip~
Legendary Chicago Internet columnist and Obama author Andy Martin will hold a New York news conference Monday, July 14th to drop the first of several bombs on the Obama campaign: Obama is illegitimate and his parents were never married.
(Excerpt) Read more at pr-inside.com ...
PING
all things work together for the good of Obama.
Many if us who pursued the various angles on Obama’s birth certificate kept telling the naysayers that it was his CREDIBILITY that was the key point, not the facts. It was the deceit/coverup that would do the damage.
I wonder what impact that would have on a “natural born citizen” discussion?
Most people are reasonable enough to understand that being born out of wedlock is not the fault of the child. Lying about it is another matter. It makes one wonder about other lies.
Us bastards take umbrage at using this against the Sheik of Chicago. Get him on being a communist dupe or a know-nothing know-it-all, instead.
Agree that these kinds of things need to come out in the campaign, and they eventually will. The trick will be to not make it appear as a high tech lynching, which is how the false messiah and his minions will portray it.
would the grown Barack Obama have advised 17 y.o. , unmarried , victim of two-timing sex predator,parent-objecting to the relationship, to ABORT THE FETUS, so she coud get on with her education and life, if that had been legal at the time?
"I criticized Obama for running a bogus campaign ad saying he grew up with a 'strong family and strong values.' The whole commercial was a lie. His father was a rake who never married his mother, and his mother showed abysmally poor judgment in being impregnated by a married man. Hardly a 'strong family' and certainly not 'strong values.' Quite the contrary. Shameful values is more like it.
"His mother was promiscuous and had a child out of wedlock, in 1961, when that was still scandalous behavior. Is this Obama's idea of 'family values?' Obviously, he has been deceiving the American people and hoping his advertising lies could overcome the truth. He has failed. My book is only the first step in our organized effort to deconstruct the mirage Obama created for the Democratic Party, and is now trying to re-create for the American people. Ironically, we're running a better and more focused campaign against Obama than John McCain is.
Obama is the biggest fraud and PR creation ever to have the gall to run for POTUS.
If true, his reply will be that he predicted "they" would run this type of campaign.
I don't know though. That isn't a good thing to get caught in a lie about. It sure doesn't help with all the strong values voters. Plus like the article says, it makes a mockery of his campaign ad.
“We plan two weeks of news conferences and other Obama-related disclosures,”
Oh good!!
This answers the question “is he black enough?”
It’s never inappropriate to wish a shameless hack good luck.
NOT.
Many people would be concerned about electing a president who was born out of wedlock because of widely known prophecies-which I have not yet seen here at FR.
The rhetoric Martin uses about Obama’s mother is going to engender sympathy for Obama- rather than the opposite. In a case like this- just stating the facts in a more low-key way would be enough. Trashing his dead mother is counterproductive.
Martin self-promotes at the expense of the story.
Does that mean, in Obama’s own terminology, that his mother was “punished” with having a baby?
Nor have I. They must not be that well known. Care to elaborate?
The lies need to be exposed- I completely agree. My point is- the WAY Martin exposes them. I don’t like self-promoters- in this case Martin inserts himself into the story unecessarily. The best investigative reports are compelling because the narrative is about the subjects- not the writer.
Legendary Chicago Internet columnist???? That's enough adjectives to whittle down his comparable peers to about one. Of course the line still makes him look brilliant. Legendary in who's mind? I've never heard of him.
“Obama is the biggest fraud and PR creation ever to have the gall to run for POTUS.”
It’s a shame this won’t stop half or more of the people in this country from voting for him.
Obama’s True Believers understand that he has to lie to get elected in this racist country. They will forgive him.
Apparently it’s working.
This is not the mother I once knew.....
It's a shame half the country will not even see or hear this story.... because most newspapers, TV, and even cable will boycott it due to the sensitive subject nature.
Perhaps I will be proved wrong, but I can envision that only talk radio will mention this.
Obama wrote two books to lay a framework of “my success” and no more. They were sheer vanity. I’m still looking for his “successes”.
You mean like....
Obama being linked to the first Beast, JFK, who received a grievous head wound and now Obama is the resurrected Beast (of questionable parentage) given a voice by the False Prophet, the MSM "who can compare to the Beast, who can make war with the Beast?", who has ties to an intolerant, anti-Christian religion?
That kind of prophecy?
Related:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2040486/posts
Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery, subverting Obama claims (Uh-oh)
MARTIN CALLS OBAMA A “GIRLY MAN” FOR USING HIS WIFE TO ADMIT HE’S ILLEGITIMATE; OBAMA’S NO COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF ANDY SAYS
Toot Toot!
Yes-not all interpret it exactly as you say, but the essential detail is well-known.
BHO: “Marriage and honesty are failed policies of the past, illegitimacy and dishonesty is change you can believe in”
Ping!
>>>the WAY Martin exposes them
If the MSM platform was even, I would absolutely agree with you.
Since the MSM platform is not an even playing field, being outrageous may be the only way to be heard.
When my book comes, I will let you know if the writing/content has the same outrageous delivery.
I like the old term, “Bastard Child”. It fits better with him.
I can’t see this having any impact on the people who want to vote for Obama. They don’t care about lies on their side (or marriage at all). The fact that this represents 50% (or more) of the American electorate means this country is in deep doo-doo.
LOL! Ok :) I think it’s great that Martin is taking this on, don’t misunderstand- I just don’t like the “Dick Morris” school of journalism.
I agree. I don’t either. But, the MSM has created a nasty wall.
Obama is such an unknown, it makes me wonder what other info is out there. i find it really hard to fathom this man could become POTUS.
Bingo.
None if he was born in the US.
Ahhhh, the good old days!*sigh* I miss them. But to the libs, if being illegit, or having an illegit child carries no shame-then what, pray tell, is he trying to conceal?
We already know tha the parents were never legally married because the senior O’Bama already had at least one married spouse.
That really is the issue. This raises questions as to how well we really know this man. It would be interesting to learn when Obama started using that name or whether is mother made that choice for him. For example, what name was used when he was in school in Indonesia--his step-father's, his mother's, or his biological father's.
Combined with his associations with Ayers, Wright, and Rezco, more and more doubt is being cast on how well we really know this guy. He is sounding more like a media creation than a real person.
Than what name would be on the birth certificate too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.