To: Schwarzeneger
2 posted on
09/12/2008 9:38:04 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: Schwarzeneger
Exactly. If he asked her if Bush advocated preemptively taking the fight to terrorists and states known to support terrorists I’m sure she would have answered correctly. The fact that she didn’t know many call it the “Bush Doctrine” is immaterial. I haven’t heard it called that in a while and I’m not sure I even remembered the term until this “scandal”.
3 posted on
09/12/2008 9:39:48 AM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Schwarzeneger; KayEyeDoubleDee
Credit to KayEyeDoubleDee
4 posted on
09/12/2008 9:40:18 AM PDT by
icwhatudo
(If my brother-n-law threatened to kill my father-I'd tell his boss too (Just like Palin did))
To: silverleaf
6 posted on
09/12/2008 9:52:16 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Schwarzeneger
Well, there IS a document, from 2002, but it’s 31 pages long and talks about all sorts of things. Gibson is the dunce pretending to be the teacher.
9 posted on
09/12/2008 10:29:29 AM PDT by
pogo101
To: Schwarzeneger
The main elements of the Bush Doctrine are normally extracted form a National Security Council document, National Security Strategy of the United States, published on September 20, 2002, and this document is often cited as the definitive statement of the BUSH Doctrine.A nit, if you will. The "Bush Doctrine", in liberalspeak, is a reference to what they also call "Cowboy Diplomacy". The "Bush Doctrine" from the liberal point of view, then, is to declare war on any country that (liberals believe) has never done anything to us.
In Liberaland, this perception of the "Bush Doctrine" is a core principle of Bush Derangement Syndrome.
10 posted on
09/12/2008 10:30:47 AM PDT by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson