Posted on 10/20/2008 3:59:51 PM PDT by MHGinTN
During a discussion of just how dangerous for America is Barack Obama, someone asked: "I want to know where is Hillary. How come she hasn't derailed this runaway train." Funny they should ask; Hillary was also an admirer of Saul Alinsky methodology, as shown with her thesis uncovered nearly a decade ago and written about in Barbara K. Olsons Hell To Pay. Hillary Clinton is campaigning for the little Marxist squirrel. What one ought to ask is, 'What has the Marxist Obama promised to Hillary so that she is helping him ascend to ultimate power?'
One of the interesting little secrets of this election is that PUMAs have discovered Hillary has evolved in her Alinskyeque perspective, moving from a pure Marxist to pragmatic socialist. [PUMAs are the Hillary voters from the primaries who have rejected the mantra of democrat party unity in order to get Barack Obama elected, instead contemplating a vote for McCain/Palin. Well look at why, momentarily.]
Marxism, relating to Capitalism, is revolution oriented, systematically tear-it-all-down oriented, destructive. Socialism, related to Capitalism, is change oriented--the very faux mantra of the actually Marxist destroyers as they are swept into power by the poor astonished fools who will be slaughtered in the aftermath.
Change is the actual campaign mantra used by Raila Odinga, the Marxist Kenyan assisted by Barack Obama in the 2006-2007 election cycle in Kenya. The deception of using change instead of revolution is meant to hook the inattentive, the hopeful, the useful idiots. Odinga tried revolution in the eighties and was jailed for it. So he switched to the less obvious change mantra, but still Kenyans rejected his deceit. It was violence and murder Odinga was more than willing to use which finally got him a position of power sharing.
Change does not immediately destroy, it gradually redirects, whereas the objective of Marxists like William Ayers and Rev. Cone--mentor to Rev Wright--is to destroy the existing society and install a different society. Barack Obama is closely connected to William Ayers, despite the lies David Axelrod has tried to float to deceive voters.
Barack Obama is pretending to be a socialist but not saying it outright, for obvious reasons. He has foisted change at the heart of his objectives, as his means to deceive his way to empowerment. He used the same deceitful technique while protecting infanticide in Illinois, in order to empower himself with pro-choice voters; the truth on Obama was he worked to protect abortion through protecting the heinous killing method know as induced labor/induced delivery abortion ... and even the radical pro-choice like Boxer, Harkin, and Clinton could not be that extreme and voted to pass the Born Alive Infant Protection Act which Obama repeatedly opposed.
Lets be clear: Barack Obama is associate of Rev. Wright, an acolyte of Rev. Cone and his Black Liberation Theology, and William Ayers, co-founder of the Weather Underground terrorists bombers. Both of these radical men, Baracks chosen associates, desired to destroy the America they saw. Ayers evolved into change oriented socialist only because he could not in the seventies succeed in destroying America.
Should Americans trust that Barack Obama will--as an associate of Rev. Wright and William Ayers--stick to change style socialism if and when he attains ultimate power in America? Does anyone believe Ayers would not resort to his original objectives when his man Barack holds the keys to destroying the America Ayers still hates? Apparently, men like Colin Powell cannot reason that far, making Colin Powell a useful idiot!
The PUMAs have seen the evolution of Hillary from stealth Marxist like Obama, to socialist. It is striking to realize that people like Colin Powell have been fooled to believe Obama is a socialist they can work with, whereas PUMAs have seen the actual Marxist behind the deceit that Obama and his squad of deceivers in media spew. Powell is a useful idiot; PUMAs are pragmatic socialist. In PUMA calculus, McCain still leads to socialism, whereas Barack Obama leads to quick destruction of the Republic. PUMAs may be right about John McCain, but I dont think so. I welcome their votes though, for we have love of this Republic in common.
I have nothing in common with William Ayers or hate spewing Rev. Wright, and these are men Barack Obama has chosen to be his associates. They are but two of the many, many radical associates Obama values. Ever heard of Franklin Raines?
kerping
kerping
Finally got time to post this ... thanks for the lead.
Well, I sure hope they get off their dead a$$ and vote . . . otherwise, this country’s going to me in terrible shape next month . . .
Don’t forget that ACORN (another associate of 0be) was founded
by fellow SDSer Wade Rathke.
As the pumas have mentioned, their party has been hijacked. I have been a republican my whole life. I cast my first vote 28 years ago for, as far as I am concerned, Our Greatest President. But the dem party of today is definately not the dem party my semi-conservative union parents voted for. They would be shocked.
Yup, he is part of that list of chosen associates, carefully chosen associations.
What more can the Clintons do to help us?
Bill was on Gretal telegraphing ‘hit Obama with his 20 years of Wright’. Extend it to include Obama practising his Black Liberation Theology religion for 20 years, which is anti-American and anti-white church, and invented by the nutcase James Cone.
If the campaign hammers on that every day they win, and they win decisively.
Ayers has never given up his goal of destroying America and remaking it into a Communist dictatorship. He has just chosen different means to achieve that end.
Cordially,
Bada Ping!
This is why I’m so protective of the PUMA’s and the comments made about them here on Freerepublic.
I have PUMA’s in my family. They didn’t know they were PUMA’s until I gave them the definition. I gave them a PUMA site to visit so they can feel at home with others like them. I gave them FREEREPUBLIC site so they can see where I’m coming from.
It just pi$$es me off when FREEPERS badmouth them. We shouldn’t be scaring them away. Blood is thicker than politics and when you dis the PUMA’S reading here...it may be my family member that has to read it...and I won’t take kindly.
Even if one regards McCain as a Democrat, one should recognize that the Democratic Party has two distinct factions. One party wants to extract as much gold from the goose as possible, but recognizes the need to keep it alive. The other is more interested in killing the goose than in collecting gold.
I do not like either wing of the Democratic Party, but now is not the time to battle with the PUMA wing. If the PUMA wing wins, there will still be a country in 2010 and 2012. If the "All your base are belong to us" (i.e. the Zero Wing) wins, there will soon be a third-world country in charge of an enormous nuclear arsenal.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Karl Marx
Very good post, Marvin. Thanks for the ping.
BTTT
I have nothing in common with William Ayers or hate spewing Rev. Wright, and these are men Barack Obama has chosen to be his associates. They are but two of the many, many radical associates Obama values.
Rev James Cone, spiritual director for Rev Wright, spiritual mentor for Barack Hussein Obama: http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=JXjiV6UukiQ&feature=related AND a twenty minute conversation with this radical anti-white, anti-American spiritual teacher; focus particularly on the segment from minute 10:20 and onward this person is not a representative for The Savior, Jesus The Christ http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=-1X5sZ6Q4Fw&feature=related
William Ayers, Weather Underground terrorist bomber: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP15wJl9YPo&feature=related AND such nice associates for a president dontchaknow.
Excellent Graphic...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.