Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California- The Bigotry State
*Oficialy*thirtysomething ^ | November 12, 2008 | Dre

Posted on 11/22/2008 4:27:34 PM PST by dbz77

I've been neglecting my blog, I admit it, but now that I think I finally have a layout that I like, perhaps I will more likely to post.

I have pictures from Halloween, my trip to NYC, and other musings, however, right now, I am still fixated on the fact that my fellow Californians passed Proposition 8, thereby banning gay marraige. California is supposed to be one of the more liberal states in the Union, yet here we are, a bunch of biggots.

That's honestly how I feel. There isn't any acceptable form of bigotry in today's day, unless you hate homosexuals! People with "Yes on 8" signs in their yard might as well have a sign that reads, "Hi - I'm a bigot! Yes on 8!"

In general my view on life is ... if it doesn't affect you or harm anyone else, then WHY DO YOU CARE??? You may not want to marry a member of the same sex, so don't(!), but why does it matter if your neighbor Jim does? It's not harming you, and the signifigance of your marriage isn't "cheapened" in any way. You took vows - so honor them and then the sanctity of marriage will remain so in your home. People spend so much time worrying about what other people are doing and labeling them "sinners" instead of focusing on themselves.

I believe this is an issue of civil rights because I believe that homosexuals don't have a choice - it's in their genetics. And the last time I checked, we don't leave issues of civil rights up to popular vote. It is my true hope that the legal system will overturn the vote and gay people can get married, have babies, throw parties, celebrate holidays ... and the world will be a better, more tolerant, place because of it.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: barf; bigotry; busyb4anoob; california; dre; elections; forsodomites; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; losertarian; pimpmylameblog; prop8; realmarriage; samesexmarriage; wheresthezot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
The following persons must be bigots:

Moses

Jesus Christ

Mohammed

The Buddha

Thomas Paine

Voltaire

Frederick Douglass

Any others who are bigots?

1 posted on 11/22/2008 4:27:34 PM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dbz77

ibtz


2 posted on 11/22/2008 4:29:15 PM PST by BADROTOFINGER (Life sucks. Get a helmet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

Not only are they ‘bigots’, but they are also proving themselves to be intolerant thugs.


3 posted on 11/22/2008 4:30:15 PM PST by realdifferent1 ("If you saw Atlas,...what would you tell him to do?"... "To shrug.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realdifferent1
People with "Yes on 8" signs in their yard might as well have a sign that reads, "Hi - I'm a bigot! Yes on 8!"
Many people in my old neighborhood in the west side of Long Beach had "Yes on 8" sign. This map shows Prop. 8 won in my old neighborhood. No Republican presidential nominee has won there since 1984.
4 posted on 11/22/2008 4:34:25 PM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
...if it doesn't affect you or harm anyone else, then WHY DO YOU CARE???...

Ezekiel 3:17-19 Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me. When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand. Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

Every soul is precious. To not warn the lost, and to lie to someone by telling them that sin is to be 'celebrated' and not repented - is exceedingly cruel.

Matthew 13:41-42 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

5 posted on 11/22/2008 4:35:42 PM PST by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
Just because sodomites can have forms of abnormal perverted
sex, this does not make it a type of marriage.
6 posted on 11/22/2008 4:36:38 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Obama, Change America will die for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
The issue of sodomite "marriage" is not one of "rights" but one of redefining marriage. Marriage has ALWAYS been defined in terms of male and female. Allowing sodomites to "marry" redefines the institution of marriage.

Marriage is the institution by which society reproduces itself. We can see all around us the disaster brought by bearing children out-of-wedlock. That isn't the way to reproduce society.

It won't do to say that letting sodomites "marry" doesn't affect all other marriages. Once marriage is redefined, all marriages are redefined. They are then no longer for continuing society, but solely for sexual gratification. There is then no reason for society to grant special privileges to married couples (tax benefits, can't be forced to testify against each other, and on and on).

7 posted on 11/22/2008 4:53:46 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (My book is out. Read excerpts at http://www.thejusticecooperative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

The people of State of California voted on an initiative that was approved by the Attorney General of the State. The initiative was completely legal, done in compliance with Article 18, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of California. The people have spoken - for a second time on this issue. dbz77, if you want to call that bigotry go for it. I call it democracy.


8 posted on 11/22/2008 5:13:16 PM PST by WacoRemembered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77; wagglebee; DirtyHarryY2K

“I believe that homosexuals don’t have a choice - it’s in their genetics.”


Both genders have a choice when it comes to yielding to temptation or not. Marriage is the way both genders have equal rights to mate and enjoy what outside of marriage is not only condemned in the Bible—it is enormously practical and replicable as an indicator of HIV risk, average household income, emotional stability and general healthy behavior.

You’re being an ideological and moral bully and bigot when you demand special extra rights for behavior that you choose to indulge in. We’re staying out of your bedroom, you or some of your friends at least are trying to thrust your bedroom practices in everyone’s face.

If it were a genetic issue, animals would more commonly act the same way as you advocate—but they don’t, and thus they mate, perpetuate and survive. Your lifestyle is artificial and only with artificial interventions can you get a placebo-like pseudo-offspring as a symbol that you ‘reproduce.’

That is sad.

If you want to know how to resolve whether the issue is indeed genetic, here you go:
http://www.exodus-international.org/

If it’s genetic, nobody would leave the lifestyle but tens of thousands are DOCUMENTED to have been freed from being overwhelmed by that temptation.

I wish you true happiness.


9 posted on 11/22/2008 5:55:08 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

bttt


10 posted on 11/22/2008 6:04:58 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("It is our choices, far more than our abilities, that show us what we truly are. " -- J.K.Rowling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

The Dalai Lama is also a bigot.


11 posted on 11/22/2008 7:04:23 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
"WHY DO YOU CARE???"

Well, frankly, I have no delusions that my caring will cause you to modify your behavior. So, I guess I don't care what you do in your private life. What I do care about is your unfortunate tendency to aggressively coerce recognition and acceptance of your chosen lifestyle. What I do care about is the fact that you will attempt to force my church to accept behavior that is completely antithetical to the beliefs we hold. What I care about is your obvious desire to subvert my religious beliefs.

If you consider yourself to be of a particular religion except for the fact you are gay, then just go ahead and start your own church where gay relationships are acceptable. Virtually all of the work will already have been done for you.

There are two components to marriage, a legal contract between you and your spouse and the state, and a covenant between the two of you and God. For the first, there isn't anything to stop you. Form a LLC with your spouse including some specifics about property and inheritance and you more or less have it covered. Go to your new church and hold a ceremony according to your "corrected" beliefs. But don't try to coerce my church into recognizing your marriage.

That's why I care.

The state should not be in the marriage business, anyway. The co-mingling of the religious and legal elements of marriage is an artifact from the monolithic church of Rome, which was above even Kings in its earthly power. Let the state enforce the legal contracts, and let the churches handle the religious aspects. And if you are an atheist the religious component of marriage shouldn't matter to you. Try exercising your rights instead of trying to infringe ours.

12 posted on 11/22/2008 7:06:54 PM PST by calenel (The Democratic Party is a Criminal Enterprise. It is the Socialist Mafia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
Marriage isn't a man/man, woman/woman, woman/man/man, man/woman/woman, man/mother, brother/sister, man/dog, three men/three women.

It's simply not.

It's one man, one woman.

You'll notice, of course, that no one is forcing all-female schools to shut down, nor all-female gyms.

No one is looking for equality. They already have that through the court system and various legal documents. What they are looking for is for the world to see NO DIFFERENCE between marriage and gay hookups.

And to that I say stick it in your ***.

13 posted on 11/22/2008 7:11:20 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
Marriage isn't a [...] man/woman/woman,

It isn't? Are you sure? Ooops!

14 posted on 11/22/2008 7:14:17 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Everytime they open their mouth they shoot themselves in the foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

Please listen carefully, Blogger.

You have two sides to this Proposition. One side wants marriage to be between a man and a woman, exclusively. Tradition and religion have been this way for thousands of years.

The other side wants two people of the same sex to be able to get married. This is new, historically, but pop culture has accepted it and many people want this for themselves or their loved ones.

That is the point. There are TWO groups of people who feel differently about this issue. Can you stand that fact?

It was held up to a vote, in a state that favors liberals, during a Presidential election that also favored liberals. The vote was fair and square. The first group won.

The second group is incensed and calling the first group horrible names, like bigots.

You tell me which side is less kind, decent, and mature.


15 posted on 11/22/2008 7:16:18 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

huh?


16 posted on 11/22/2008 7:18:03 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dbz77; scripter; little jeremiah; Clint N. Suhks
Troll alert!

This one needs an education (cannot post links from PDA)

17 posted on 11/22/2008 7:18:54 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (Don't blame Texas.. No more RINO's or Mavericks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

Because the country doesn’t want to legitimize a mental disorder as a normal lifestyle choice. We don’t want predators, whether they be the trusted uncle, little league coach, priest, or boy scout leader to molest children under the guise that it’s “normal”. It’s not normal.

These predators prey on lonely, troubled and confused kids who don’t know anything about sexuality and can be swayed due to pressure. This is the danger of calling their abnormal sexual behavior normal. It legitimizes experimentation in children who know nothing about sex, some are just starved for any adult attention and will go along with being molested.

Homosexuality is a mental disorder triggered in early childhood development, there is no gay gene, there may be a predilection but as of now there is no proof that anyone is “born gay”. Predilection does not mean one is destined to be gay, many of us may have the predilection to be a serial killer, but lack the developmental traumas and triggers that bring out the behavior. “Normalize” homosexuality and you open the door for predators, who can take adolescents with NO predilection towards homosexuality and bring them into the lifestyle with peer pressure, attention and acceptance.

Everything I said will stand up to scrutiny and science, this may be one of the few message boards on the internet where I won’t be banned for saying it.

Suck on the truth homo activists.


18 posted on 11/22/2008 7:19:44 PM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

Will the Homos boycott California? NO.


19 posted on 11/22/2008 7:21:08 PM PST by Clemenza (Red is the Color of Virility, Blue is the Color of Impotence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

Not only that, but Prop 8 actually won buy a slight margin (less than a percent) in LOS ANGELES COUNTY. If you look at a map of the area that voted “yes” is was the eastern part of the county from East La through to the County Line, as well as South Central LA and parts of the San Fernando Valley that were a little, uh, ethnic (IE Van Nuys). It lost in the “white” parts of LA County (Westwood, Beverly Hills, Sherman Oaks, etc.).


20 posted on 11/22/2008 7:23:20 PM PST by Clemenza (Red is the Color of Virility, Blue is the Color of Impotence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson