Posted on 12/01/2008 8:45:17 AM PST by ConservativeStatement
A busty blond model who has graced the covers of dozens of romance novels created real-life melodrama at her soon-to-be ex-husband's fraud trial when she got into a catfight with his new girlfriend and allegedly threatened to cause a ruckus in the courtroom.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
As I initially stated prior to the entire exchange going off on a tangent.. I thought that the “past use date” comment was sexist in the least and extremely rude. Not the kind of comment a gentlman should make in the presence of a lady..(and there are a number of them around this forum) but maybe thats just because of where, when and how I was raised
No way...I’m sure a lot of us would hit that
Born on date smorn on date...Id hit it...several times;)
For such a sensitive guy, you sure don’t seem to follow through in your own writings. Check out your own freeper page. What you wrote could be construed as offensive toward another protected class.
I try not to be a hypocrite, but maybe thats just because of where, when, by whom, and how I was raised.
It IS the land of fruits and nuts
Yes, it is, (that's not even up for debate) and the skank who is the subject of discussion IS "past her sell-by date". Sometimes you just have to call a spade a spade, and not be a freakin hypocrite. Capisce?
The verbage was USE by not sell by.. keyword “USE”.. Insinuating that women should be “used” is a little different than refering to mexifornia as the land of fruits and nuts.. IMHO and I see no hipocracy Vehrstehen Sei?
So “selling” a woman is better than “using” one? Uh, OK.
Look, I fully agree I was crude. My intent was to convey disgust for this used-up-pin-up in a pithy way, which I did.
She stormed into a courtroom, threated her replacement (described a “brunette,” as if to draw a contrast) waiving her wedding ring of her pending-divorcee husband -— who was on trial for bribing union officials.
She threatened to prejudice the jury by making a scene.
She was so out-of-control a federal judge sat a federal marshall down next to her.
That’s pretty much the Third Act in the life of a used-up-Hamptons bimbet, if I ever heard one.
WAY past her sell-by date.
The problem with that, is they follow you home.
This chick reeks of “bunny boiler.”
That’s why you hit it at their place...never let them know where yours is.
Psst, it’s ‘hypocrisy’ (as I showed you), and you reek of it. Good attempt at a troll, better luck next time.
BTW, chicks like her use, and expect to get used in return. They basically have sex for money. They treat men like they treat themselves - chattel. What’s that make them? I think you know the answer, too.
See, that never worked for me. Bit too high profile.
Remind me to tell you about getting named as the father of a child whose mother I never met (let alone slept with) -— because the mom saw me in the newspaper.
We apparently will not agree on anything here and I’m gettin off work so ...cya.. the day went by pretty fast for me...you??
Yes, its Rita. She got dumped by Fox News more than a year ago.
I’m sure we likely agree on more than we disagree on.
Holy carp, it’s almost time for the 40-hour crowd to leave me alone so i can get my work done!
I’d hit it like a lab puppy on a new chew toy!
Oh man....(chuckle)
If you were in California (LA county), Gil Garcetti would still have you paying support until the kid got out of college. They hose you on procedurals, and hook you for life, even if you never have been in Cali. Tough crap, somebody’s gotta pay.
No doubt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.